@Renaldo Dubois,
Renaldo Dubois wrote:
But they are based on facts. You haven't established that they aren't. Let's start there.
Oh, I see. The obstacle here is that you
want to believe Park51 is somehow related to 9/11.
Renaldo Dubois wrote:
Who does your Imam represent and which Sharia nations is he allied with?
He isn't
my Imam. I'm not a Muslim.
The Imam in question is quite a good friend to the USA. He has in the past assisted the FBI and other intelligence agencies with fighting radical Islamic groups. He is aligned with no sharia nations. Many Mullahs would probably be happy to see him dead.
I guess you could learn this on your own if you'd google his biography first before asking a question. I don't mind sharing though, so I don't mind helping you now and then. I suggest you read more.
I guess that clears it up. You have asked about who is building Park51, and now you've been answered. You now know it will serve an already existing community in lower Manhattan, it will be open to non-muslims and have non-muslim activities (much like a YMCA), and that the leader of the project is an American ally who has helped fight against terror groups. Being that you have yet to provide a factual basis for your fear that this is a victory mosque related to 9/11, you can now relax. It must be relieving to have more knowledge.
The only way it wouldn't be is if you simply wanted to hate these people and were insistent on your narrative in spite of the facts presented to you.
Renaldo Dubois wrote:
My metaphor is exactly on target.
"On target?" You keep adding dimensions to this metaphor. Bending over, which is why I'm in a ditch on target. This is very complicated. How about you simply say what you mean instead of using metaphors. It may make it easier for you to communicate your feelings.
Renaldo Dubois wrote:
You are nothing more than a useful idiot for the enemy of freedom.
How is supporting Muslims in lower Manhattan obtain equal protection make me a useful idiot? In protecting their freedoms, I'm protecting my own. If Christians are not allowed to over reach, neither are Muslims. This is a simple ethical standard.
Renaldo Dubois wrote:
Your support for Sharia Law is counter to everything American.
I do not support Sharia law. I'd say it's more likely that you'll find Christians who support:
No homosexuality.
No abortion.
No pornography.
Strict drug laws.
Sex only within the confines of marriage.
Every time Christians find a way to legislate against the above, they make our society more like that of sharia rule. I don't support that.
A
R
T