Are you against Christian Sharia Law?

I really don't care what you think about goal posts. You don't matter. All that matters is our goal. Go cry to your coach and your mommy.

Millions are being made in the Xlam hate industry by Xtian evangelists

This from the Tennessean http://www.tennessean.com/article/20101024/NEWS01/10240374/Anti-Muslim-crusaders-make-millions-spreading-fear

BTW when this happened in Germany it was called kristallnacht.



You making any money off of your Xtian hate boobie? You may be missing an opportunity.

Rap

I see you agree with me. When you don't score you just move the goal posts so you can claim you scored.
Look, you scored again. and again. We'll all pretend you didn't make your original claims. We don't want you to feel bad.

Jealousy is such a weak trait.

Why, of course. I learned it from watching liberals. Thanks for the tip.

Boobie, then you admit that Xtians are jealous of Sharia?

I'll admit that when you admit you're a dirty diaper baby.

A dirty diaper for you, bubbette.

One that appeals to Xtian intolerance.

Rap

It's not stopping. What makes you think the building won't get built?


The only way I "loose" is if Christians successfully gain the right to assert their worldview on me and tell me where I can go, what I can do, who I can talk to. I'm not a Muslim, and I'm not particularly interested in going to Park51. Individual liberty happens to be something I value though, so a overreach on Muslims is a loss for us all.


Or I can simply go to http://park51.org/ and read updates about their progress.

You seem to forget that the Muslim community that this place would serve already exists in lower Manhattan. They already are a part of the community, and none of this, not one iota, has anything to do with sharia law.

A
R
T

You've got it backwards. Looks to those of us with common sense that the muslims are the ones who are trying to make us live according to their world view. The fact that you and your pals around here are haters of Christians is deplorable.

It has to do with victory symbols. We know why the mosque is being built there. That is what muslims do. Every place they conquor they erect a mosque. There are many mosques in NYC. Why do they need one so desparately at that site? You can't ask yourself that because you know the answer. No one cares if they are part of the community. What we care about is the domination that they expect will be theirs by slowly taking ground. They take their time and pretty soon we will look like France and have to pass laws to keep our nation from looking like Pakistan. No thanks. When you come to America, you melt. They don't want to melt. They will eventually want to rul like they always do. Read a history book because in my educated opinion you know absolutely nothing about Islam.

Your mosque is not being built at that site. You lost. Accept it and move on with your next project. Ever hear the term "Useful Idiots"?

Notice how I replied to you. That is how you debate on the internet.

I never would have guessed your goal in life was to act like a liberal.


Congratulations. Perhaps you should do it a bit more.

Thanks for the encouragement. I do plan to do it more.

Are you prepared to broaden your narrow worldview and practice tolerance for other cultures and religions, bubbette?

Or are you going to continue to parrot the machinations of Murdock?

I'll do that when you stop molesting children.

Praising yourself as having "common sense" is about a meaningful as giving yourself a "world's best boss mug." You can't assert your own common sense, it has to be observed by others. I'll point out some of the areas for you in which you are not demonstrating it.


I do not hate Christians. At the same time, Christians are not beyond contempt. Nobody is.


9/11 wasn't a victory for Islam.


People who care to read do know the reason. The reason is plainly that the current mosque is too small for all of it's members and they need a larger space. One floor of the Park51 space was going to be used for this, and other secular outreach activities.


How about a more rational view. Anywhere Christians/Muslims/Buddists are, a church/mosque/temple will most likely exist. Muslims exist in new york, and so the presence of mosques should not be translated as conquest.

You are employing emotionalism, not rationalism.


I have asked, and the answer was not so elusive. They are a new york community in lower Manhattan, the only place that makes sense to find a space is lower Manhattan. Why would they decide to build away from their community? That doesn't make any sense.


Plenty of people do.


What domination comes from Park51? Specifically.


Nonsense.

1) Muslims in the USA adapt a lot of western culture such as dress and manner of speech.

2) What melting have you done? You can't expect others to do what you don't. I suspect that melting is something you expect of others exclusively. You want other people who move here to adopt to your expectations.

We'll add egoism to the list of things you need to work on.


History books won't agree. History books will show more Christan rulers taking lands and building victory churches. I think your projecting Christianity's history onto Muslims.

That's blushing.


It's not my mosque, and Park51 probably will be built in the next few years.


Yes. It is a cliche conservative talking point that leverages emotional rejection of a person. See also: poisoning the well.


I did notice. I notice much in your posts. In reply, I'm not convinced that in terms of debate, there is a special way to do it "on the internet." More likely proper intellectual exchange operates on the same rules under all circumstances. Given how your rhetorical style of emotionalism and ad hominems, I'd say that your post is certainly a good example of how many people express their feelings on the internet. It however is not how facts and data are exchanged in order to reach more informed views.

You've got a long way, but hang in there.

A
R
T

Still beating your wife and kicking your dogs, sheep f**ker?

See, I too can take cues from Murdock, bubbie.

Rap

Only a moron would expect a rational person to accept the premise that Christianity is the problem in the world rather than Islam.

Your limited world view and myopic perspective of Christianity prohibit any rational person from explaining how things work to you.

Still taking your cues from GE and NBC. Pay your taxes.

Do you have the balls to come over to the other thread and admit that you were perfectly wrong - and that nobody had cut any of what you wrote out? That's what an honorable person, interested in upholding standards of conversation, would do.

You've got a giant chip on your shoulder, about how you're better than all the Lefties here. Now, we'll see if you have any sense of personal honor, or are just a useless, loudmouth asshole.

Cycloptichorn

Red Herring. I never said that "Christianity is the problem in the world." I also never said that Islam is without flaw/fault. I also don't endorse the idea of "the" problem. Life is far more dynamic than that. Our problems do not resolve to singular entities. My criticism, in the case of a thread like this, is that Christianity attempts to assert domain over most of the same things as Islam and so it is an ethical conflict to condemn the same things they attempt to do.


Am I to assume that you believe your view to be anything but limited? Am I in the presence of a sage?

A
R
T