blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Dec, 2003 12:55 pm
In the seventies I toured Canada quite a bit...stationed out of Winnipeg....played hotels Mon-Thurs and went out on weekends as far east as Thunder Bay and as far west as Saskatoon. Cold as a witches tit at times...but beautiful...and the Canadian women I encountered, to a person, were hot enough to make up for the cold weather. Good times and good memories......
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Dec, 2003 02:24 pm
Quote:
Thinking drugs laws are stupid is one thing. Thinking it is okay to drive while impaired is another thing completely.


Well, we don't know that he was impaired. Instead of busting kids for smoking a joint, there ought to be guidelines for impairment, just like there is for drunkeness while driving.

I would suspect that if all the baby boomers who smoked dope at one time or another were put in the pokey, no one would be living in the suburbs! Laughing

Seriously though, big deal!
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Dec, 2003 02:26 pm
Busting all the baby boomers who ever smoked dope would also put a big dent in the SUV market. Hmmm....
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Dec, 2003 02:31 pm
I doubt they can devise a test for being impaired by pot.

But in any case, my remarks were occasioned by the comment that the cop smelled pot.


I do agree with all the reservations people have voiced, but bottom line in my book:

It ain't a good idea to toke while driving.
0 Replies
 
Fedral
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Dec, 2003 03:23 pm
While I personally feel that our elected officials have to be held to a higher standard than a 'regular joe', I feel that the media needs to stay 'hands off' the families.

Politicians choose to get involved in their field and thus make themselves public figures and thus subject to media scrutiny. Their children were never consulted and had no choice on the life they were given and thus, in my opinion, should be thrown a little slack in their conduct.

Just my 2 cents, pre tax.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Dec, 2003 03:37 pm
An opinion it would not have occurred to me anyone would express, and, in fact, a notion which had not occurred to me. Point well taken, Boss . . .
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Dec, 2003 05:10 pm
Do you consider dopiness retrogressively inheritable, McGentrix?

I am so with hands off families. And the same goes for drunken Bush daughters.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Dec, 2003 05:48 pm
dlowan wrote:
Do you consider dopiness retrogressively inheritable, McGentrix?

I am so with hands off families. And the same goes for drunken Bush daughters.

I disagree..I volunteer to participate in a "hands on" intervention for the Bush twins! Wink
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Gore's dopey son
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/20/2021 at 04:12:33