0
   

America - the charade versus the realities

 
 
JTT
 
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2011 01:35 am
"There is no such thing in America as an independent press, unless it is in the country towns.

You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to writes (sic) his honest opinions, and if you did you know beforehand that it would never appear in print.

I am paid one hundred and fifty dollars a week for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with--others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things--and any of you who would be so foolish as to write his honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job.

The business of the New York journalist is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell his race and his country for his daily bread.

You know this and I know it, and what folly is this to be toasting an "Independent Press."

We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping-jacks; they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."

John Swinton, former Chief of Staff of New York Times, 1953
 
JTT
 
  2  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2011 01:38 am
"Any dictator would admire the uniformity and obedience of the [U.S.] media."

Noam Chomsky
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jan, 2011 10:02 am
Telling.

I quit my first journalism job.

I was sent as a photographer and reporter to a school board meeting. I was still in college and it was academic '68-'69.

A group of polite and well-spoken students presented a petition to the school board, requesting a relaxed dress code. They asked that girls be allowed to wear pants and that all students be allowed to wear jeans. The spokesman for the group included the names, addresses and phone numbers of their committee members so that the board members had the ability to speak one-on-one with the students.

I wrote a straight news story.

When it appeared in print with my by-line, at the point where I wrote about the passing of the names-and-numbers list, the editor had inserted a few words: "In a gesture of charity . . ."

In other words, he editorialized in the news story, under my name.

I told him that he had the right to express his negative opinion of the kids he called "ridiculous" to me during our confrontation but that he had no right to editorialize in a news story and never under the by-line of another.

That is the sort of chicanery I have come to expect from the right. Watch the usual suspects -- H2O, okie, ican, david -- leap in with their typically baseless comments and their general lack of sophistication and their poor reading skills and ruin this thread by asserting that the press is liberal.
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  2  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2011 10:52 am
Of course everyone knows that the press is liberal, that Obama isent a U.S. citizen and Rony Raygun was the greatest president in the history of the U.S..
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  3  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2011 12:09 pm
"The general public are viewed as no more than ignorant and meddlesome outsiders, a bewildered herd. And it's the responsible men who have to make decisions and to protect society from the trampling and rage of the bewildered herd. Now since it's a democracy they - the herd, that is - are permitted occasionally to lend their weight to one or another member of the responsible class. That's called an election."

Noam Chomsky
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  3  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2011 12:13 pm
A fine description of life in America.

"Most Americans have no idea that what we are fed by the news media is nothing more than a portrayal of what powerful corporations want us to believe, that what happens to pass as education is as often as not mere propaganda, that what we learn in church may have very little or nothing to do with the truth, that what our parents teach us may be nothing more than an accumulation of their own personal biases, no doubt a rather subtle modification of what they were taught by their parents. And through such a process, governments and nations around the world wield control as to what their citizens, believe, value, and do."

Doug Soderstrom
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  2  
Reply Wed 19 Jan, 2011 12:22 pm
See number 18, Cycloptichorn, Tico.

Mirror, Mirror On The Wall,
Who's The Biggest Rogue of All?

by Richard Du Boff

Z magazine, September 2003


What follows is a record of the U. S. rogue role in the world -- its crimes and imperial designs.

1. Comprehensive [Nuclear] Test Ban Treaty, 1996. Signed by 164 nations and ratified by 89 including France, Great Britain, and Russia; signed by President Clinton in 1996, but rejected by the Senate in 1999. The U.S. is one of 13 non-ratifiers among countries that have nuclear weapons or nuclear power programs. In November 2001, the U.S. forced a vote in the UN Committee on Disarmament and Security to demonstrate its opposition to the Treaty and announced plans to resume nuclear testing of new short-range tactical nuclear weapons.

2. Antiballistic Missile Treaty, 1972. In December 2001, the U.S. officially withdrew from the landmark agreement-the first time in the nuclear era that the U.S. renounced a major arms control accord.

3. Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, 1972. Ratified by 144 nations including the U.S. In July 2001 the U.S. walked out of a London conference to discuss a 1994 protocol designed to strengthen the Convention by providing for on-site inspections. At Geneva in November 2001, Undersecretary of State for arms control John Bolton stated, "the protocol is dead," at the same time accusing Iraq, Iran, North Korea, Libya, Sudan, and Syria of violating the Convention, but offering no specific allegations or supporting evidence to substantiate the charges. In May 2002, Bolton accused Cuba of carrying out germ-warfare research, again producing no evidence. The same month, three Pentagon documents revealed proposals, dating from 1994, to develop U.S. offensive bioweapons that destroy materials ("biofouling and biocorrosion"), in violation of the Convention and a 1989 U.S. Iaw that implements the Convention.

4. UN Agreement to Curb the International Flow of Illicit Small Arms, 2001. The U.S. was the only nation in opposition. Undersecretary Bolton said the Agreement was an "important initiative" for the international community, but one that the U.S. "cannot and will not" support, since it could impinge on the constitutional right of Americans to keep and bear arms.

5. International Criminal Court (ICC) Treaty, 1998. Set up in The Hague to try political leaders and military personnel charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity. Concluded in Rome in July 1998, the Treaty was signed by 120 countries. Although President Clinton signed the Treaty in December 2000, he announced that the U.S. would oppose it, along with six others (including China, Russia, and Israel). In May 2002, the Bush administration announced it was "unsigning" the Treaty, something the U.S. had never before done, and that it would neither recognize the Court's jurisdiction nor furnish any information to help the Court bring cases against any individuals. In July 2002, the ICC went into force after being ratified by more than the required number of 60 nations, including Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain-Russia now having signed, but not ratified.

Throughout 2002 and 2003, the U.S. worked to scuttle the Treaty by signing bilateral agreements not to send each other's citizens before the ICC. By mid-2003, the U. S. had signed 37 mutual immunity pacts, mostly with poor, small countries in Africa, Asia, Central America, and Eastern Europe. Threatened with the loss of $73 million in U.S. aid, for example, Bosnia signed such a deal. In July 2003, the Bush administration suspended all military assistance to 35 countries that refused to pledge to give U.S. citizens immunity before the ICC.

6. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969. The U.S. signed but did not ratify. In May 2002, as the U.S. was unsigning the ICC Treaty, it simultaneously announced that it would not be bound by the Vienna Convention, which outlines the obligations of nations to obey other treaties. Article 18 requires signatory nations not to take steps to undermine treaties they sign even if they do not ratify them.

7. The American Servicemen's [sic] Protection Act, 2002. The Bush administration has been working overtime to nullify the ICC. In November 2002, the president signed this Act, which not only bars cooperation with the ICC and threatens sanctions for countries that ratify it, but authorizes the use of "all means necessary" to free any U.S. national who might be held in The Hague for trial before the ICC.

8. Land Mine Treaty, 1997. Banning the use, production, or shipment of anti-personnel bombs and mines, the treaty was signed in Ottawa in December 1997 by 123 nations. President Clinton refused to submit it for ratification, claiming the mines were needed to protect South Korea against North Korea's "overwhelming military advantage," a proposition denied by the heads of North and South Korea in June 2000. In August 2001, President Bush rejected the treaty.

9. Kyoto Protocol of 1997, intended to control greenhouse gas emissions and reduce global warming. Declared "dead" by President Bush in March 2001. No other country has chosen to abandon the treaty completely. In November 2001, the Bush administration shunned negotiations in Marrakech (Morocco) to revise the accord, mainly by watering it down in an attempt to gain U.S. approval. In February 2002, Bush announced a new plan to limit emissions-by measures that are to be strictly voluntary. The U.S. is the largest single producer of these emissions, generating 20 percent of the world's total.

10. International Plan for Cleaner Energy, 2001. The U.S. was the only nation to oppose this Plan, put forth by the G-8 group of industrial nations (U.S., Canada, Japan, Russia, Germany, France, Italy, UK) in Genoa in July 2001. It would phase out fossil fuel subsidies and increase financing for nonpolluting energy sources worldwide.

11. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982 and the 1994 Agreement relating to Implementation of Part IX (Deep Seabed Mining). It establishes a legal framework for management of marine resources and preservation of the marine environment for future generations-including fish stocks, minerals, international navigation, marine scientific research, and marine technologies. President Clinton submitted these treaties to the Senate in 1994, but they have not been ratified, as they have been by 135 and 100 countries respectively. The primary obstacle to applying them remains the absence of U.S. ratification.

12. Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, 2000. An international treaty sponsored by 130 nations, it seeks to protect biological diversity from risks posed by genetically modified organisms resulting from biotechnology. To date, it has been ratified by 13 countries and signed by 95 more, including the United Kingdom, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Ireland, both Koreas, China, India, Indonesia, Argentina, and Mexico. The U.S. has long argued that there is no reason for such a protocol, has not ratified it, and is not expected to.

13. European Union (EU) talks on economic espionage and electronic surveillance of phone calls, e-mail, and faxes, May 2001. The U.S. refused to meet with EU nations to discuss, even at lower levels of government, these activities carried out under its Echelon program. Meanwhile, the U.S. escalated its opposition to the EU's Galileo project, a global satellite navigation system that would rival the U.S. Global Positioning System (GPS), funded and controlled by the Department of Defense and serving thousands of corporate and individual users worldwide, all monitored and recorded by the U.S. In December 2001, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz told the EU that Galileo would have "negative consequences for future NATO operations" and would interfere with GPS. (In fact, it is planned to be compatible.) In March 2002, the EU announced that it would proceed with Galileo, slated to be operational in 2008.

14. Multilateral talks sponsored by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, May 2001. Discussion on ways to end "Harmful Tax Competition"-tax evasion and money-laundering operations carried out through off-shore tax havens. The U.S. refused to participate. In negotiations in Vienna under the auspices of the UN, the U.S., and the EU are also battling over a proposed global Convention Against Corruption. Europe wants the pact to cover businesses and governments; the U.S. wants it restricted to governments.

15. World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, September 2001. Convened by UNESCO (UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) and the UN High Commission for Human Rights. It brought together 163 countries. The U.S. withdrew from the Conference, alleging anti-Israel and anti-Semitic politics on the part of many delegations. The final declaration of the conference expressed "concern about the plight of the Palestinian people under foreign occupation" and "recognized the inalienable right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to the establishment of an independent State and...the right to security for all States in the region, including Israel. "

16. The 39-year-old illegal embargo against Cuba by the U.S. Under Bush II, it has been tightened. In November 2002, the UN General Assembly passed, for the 11th consecutive year, a resolution calling for an end to the boycott by a vote of 173 to 3, the largest majority since the General Assembly first debated the issue in 1992. The U.S., Israel, and the Marshall Islands voted against the resolution.

17. UNESCO. The U.S. quit UNESCO and ceased its payments for UNESCO's budget in 1984. The pretext was the New World Information and Communication Order (NWICO), which was not a UNESCO project, but a proposal, backed by several groups, including UNESCO, for change in global communications designed to lessen dependence of developing countries on Western media, news agencies, and advertising firms. The NWICO proposal was dropped in 1989; the U.S. nonetheless refused to rejoin UNESCO. In 1995, the Clinton administration proposed rejoining; the move was blocked in Congress. In February 2000, the U.S. finally paid some of its arrears to the UN but excluded UNESCO. President Bush stated that the U.S. would rejoin UNESCO in September 2002, when he appeared before the UN to ask for a resolution authorizing him to attack Iraq.

18. State-sponsored terrorism. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague held the U.S. in violation of international law for "unlawful use of force" in Nicaragua, 1986, through its own actions and those of its Contra proxy army. The U.S. refused to recognize the Court's jurisdiction. A 1988 UN resolution that "urgently calls for full and immediate compliance with the Judgment of the International Court of Justice of June 27, 1986 in the case of 'Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua' in conformity with the relevant provisions of the Charter of the United Nations" was approved 94-2 (U.S. and Israel voting no).

19. Optional Protocol, 1989, to the UN's International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966). Aimed at abolition of the death penalty, it contained a specific provision banning the execution of those under 18. The U.S. has neither signed nor ratified and exempts itself from the latter provision, making it one of five countries that still execute juveniles (with Saudi Arabia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Iran, and Nigeria). China abolished the practice in 1997, Pakistan in 2000.

20. UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, 1979. Ratified by 169 nations. President Carter signed CEDAW in 1980, but the Senate blocked it. The only countries that have signed, but not ratified, are the U.S., Afghanistan, Sao Tome and Principe.

21. UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989. It protects the economic and social rights of children. The U.S. has signed, but not ratified. The only other country not to ratify is Somalia.

22. Cairo Action Plan, 1994. Adopted by 179 nations at the Cairo International Conference on Population and Development in 1994. It seeks to establish "reproductive health services and health care" as a means for curbing population growth in developing countries. In July 2002, the U.S. cut off its $34 million annual contribution to the UN family-planning program and, in November, withdrew its support of the Cairo Action Plan. The State Department's population office stated that the Plan implied a right to abortion and undermined the U.S. international campaign for sexual abstinence to avoid pregnancy.

23. UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 1948. The U.S. finally ratified in 1988, adding several "reservations" to the effect that the U.S. Constitution and the "advice and consent" of the Senate are required to judge whether any "acts in the course of armed conflict" constitute genocide. The reservations are rejected by Britain, Italy, Denmark, the Netherlands, Spain, Greece, Mexico, Estonia, and others.

24. Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 1987. Ratified by the U.S. in 1994. In the UN Economic and Social Council in July 2002, the U.S. tried to stop a vote on a protocol to reinforce the Convention. The protocol would establish a system of inspections of prisons and detention centers worldwide to check for abuses. The U.S. claimed that the new plan would allow monitors to gain access to American prisoners and detainees-including, presumably, those held in U.S. detention camps in Guantanamo, Afghanistan, and now Iraq.

25. Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and Optional Protocols, 1963. The U.S. is a long-time violator, by detaining foreign nationals and failing to notify their governments. In 1999, two German citizens, Walter LeGrand and his brother Karl, were put to death in an Arizona gas chamber. When arrested in 1984 for the murder of a bank teller, the LeGrands were not informed of their right to contact the German embassy and German officials were unable to provide legal aid. In 1998, the World Court (the ICJ) ruled that the U.S. had violated international law in the case and asked the U. S. Supreme Court to stay the execution. The Supreme Court dismissed the request. In 2002, Mexico petitioned the ICJ to grant stays of execution for 54 Mexicans held on death row in the U.S., arguing that U.S. municipal and state officials are violating the Vienna Convention. In August 2002, Mexican President Vicente Fox cancelled a meeting with President Bush at his Texas ranch to protest Alabama's execution of Mexican citizen Javier Suarez Medina, who was denied the right to seek help from his government when arrested in 1988.

After September 11, 2001, U.S. violations of the Convention multiplied, with more than 600 "unlawful combatants" detained in Guantanamo and elsewhere without charges, denied all legal rights, and held for possible trial before closed military tribunals.

26. Agreement among all other 143 members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) to help poor nations buy medicines to fight AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, and other diseases, by relaxing patent laws that keep prices of drugs beyond their reach, concluded at the WTO Ministerial Conference in Doha, Qatar in November 2001. In December 2002, the U.S. single-handedly destroyed the agreement. Sources at the WTO in Geneva said that the U.S. decision came directly from the White House, following intense lobbying from U.S. pharmaceutical companies.

Is the status of "we're number one" rogue overcome by generous foreign aid given to less fortunate countries? The three best foreign aid providers in 2002, measured by the aid percentage of their gross domestic products, were Denmark (1.01 percent), Norway (0.91 percent), and the Netherlands (0.79 percent). The worst was the U.S. (0.10 percent) followed by the UK (0.23 percent). A 2003 index, put together by the Center for Global Development and Foreign Policy magazine and ranking the contribution made by 21 developed nations to growth in the developing world, placed the U.S. 20th; only Japan ranked lower.

The foregoing record of the biggest rogue of all excludes the use of armed force against other nations. According to the Congressional Research Service (Report 96-119F, "Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad"), from 1798 through 1995 there were 251 instances (of which only five were declared wars) when the U.S. used its armed forces abroad, in situations of military conflict or potential conflict or for other than normal peacetime purposes. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the level of U. S. military activism abroad has been unprecedented.

"Since the end of the Cold War, the United States has embarked on nearly four dozen military interventions [during 1989-1999] as opposed to only 16 during the entire period of the Cold War. Many of these interventions, such as those in Somalia, Haiti, Bosnia, and Kosovo, were launched into areas traditionally considered marginal to U.S. interests" ("New World Coming: American Security in the 21st Century," September 1999, United States Commission on National Security/21st Century).



Richard DuBoff is professor of economics at Bryn Mawr College. He's the author of Accumulation and Power: An Economic History of the United States (M.E. Sharpe l989).
0 Replies
 
Pamela Rosa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jan, 2011 12:43 pm

Second-order simulacra

Quote:
Second-order simulacra, a term coined by Jean Baudrillard, are symbols without referents, that is, symbols with no real object to represent. Simply put, a symbol is itself taken for reality and further layer of symbolism is added. This occurs when the symbol is taken to be more important or authoritative of the original entity, authenticity has been replaced by copy (thus reality is replaced by a substitute).

The consequence of the propagation of second-order simulacra is that, within the affected context, nothing is "real," though those engaged in the illusion are incapable of seeing it. Instead of having experiences, people observe spectacles, via real or metaphorical control screens. Instead of the real, we have simulation and simulacra, the hyperreal.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-order_simulacra
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » America - the charade versus the realities
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 07:04:21