Whim gets off to a flying start.
(1-(2+(3+4))) * (5 * (6-(7 * 8 ))) = 2000
2-(((3/4) * (5-(6 * 7))) * (8 * 9)) = 2000
Are there any more? Yes of cause there are.
Blame Whim for what? Repeating digits. Oh. and the poor weather. :wink:
2*(22+2)+2 = 50, not 34. Any further advances?
Mark:
"2000 NINE WAYS"
Mark sets the standard to go for. BTW there are at least nine ways using 3's. Any other takers?
Holler if any of the operations I use are illegal.
?'I am sorry to hear that. I once had a sick parrot, but an ill eagle is another matter.'
None could do better.
(1+1)/(.1^(1+1+1)) (6 ones)
2*(2/.2)^(2+2/2) (6 twos)
(3-3/3)*(3/.3)^3 (6 threes)
sqrt(4)*(4/.4)^(4-4/4) (6 fours)
.5*(5!+5)/(.5)^5 (5 fives)
sqrt(((6/.6)^6)*6*.6) (5 sixes)
((7+7)/7)*(7/.7)^sqrt(7/.7) (7 sevens)
(8+8)*8*8/(.8*.8*.8) (7 eights)
(.9+.9)*(9/.9)^sqrt(9) (5 nines)
Perhaps someone would be kind enough to help me out. My problem is, I have a number of calculations to make, and my calculator will only print out ?'9's. Can you think of a way I can only use ?'9's to make copies of the digits 1-20
As the battery is low, can you please do so in the shortest way. Thank you.
It is known that the first 144 digits of Pi equals 666. The first 146 digits of the golden ratio equals 666.
Given a random irrational number, what is the probability that 666 will be hit exactly by taking successive digits
You are presented with 3 envelopes. Each envelope has 2 statements written on it, the statements on one envelope are both true, the statements on another are both false, and the remaining envelope has one statement that is true and one that is false.
Envelope 1:
1. The formula is not in here
2. The formula is in envelope 2
Envelope 2:
1. The formula is not in envelope 1
2. The formula is in envelope 3
Envelope 3.
1. The formula is not here
2. The formula is in envelope 1.
Which envelope contains the formula