0
   

Not seen in nature? Which?

Forums: English, Esl, Grammar
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
oristarA
 
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 09:27 am
artificial proteins? or "genetic sequences"?

Context:

Hecht and his research group set about to create artificial proteins encoded by genetic sequences not seen in nature. They produced about 1 million amino acid sequences that were designed to fold into stable three-dimensional structures.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 569 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 09:56 am
@oristarA,
The sequences, but I can see how it could be construed to be both or either.
--Joe(interesting)Nation
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  2  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 11:56 am

Artificial proteins are not seen in nature, by definition.

Therefore it's the sequences.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Jan, 2011 02:11 am
Thank you both
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Expert help needed: pronoun form following main verb before a gerund - Question by adavis444
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Do you understand what "Transition overground" means? - Question by Alexander7
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
Is this paragraph incomprehensible? Would you suggest an edit? - Question by tamara123454
Does this sentence make any sense in English? - Question by estherara
Could someone review my assignment? - Question by kair0s
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Not seen in nature? Which?
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/06/2025 at 12:30:01
▲ ▼