OCCOM BILL wrote:I got news for you folks; that disaster couldn't have been avoided if we had the blueprints. I've been on dozens of flights since then and there is still no way to prevent such an attack. The new security doors may help, but they sure don't look like much to me. The number of items still slipping past security is staggering. The mail-cargo is still virtually un-scrutinized and the occasional cop against 4 to 5 trained killers remains a mismatch. Personally, I think they should attach a Louisville Slugger to every seat with a warning of serious penalties for disturbing it without cause. Try jacking a plain full of angry people armed with baseball bats.
To answer your question, no, that's not big news. Hindsight is usually pretty close to 20/20 and in retrospect I'm sure both administrations wish they'd have done more to prevent it. The unfortunate truth is; any person willing to die to commit a crime has an excellent chance of succeeding. Ask yourself if you could pull it off today. I'll bet you don't like the answer.
There's a kernel or two of wisdom in there.
"What were we
thinking, letting people on planes with boxcutters?!?" was one of the first questions that came to my mind in the wake of the tragedy.
But you kind of go off the rails after that, Bill, considering that Bush has cut funding to first-responders, that 95% of the container cargo in our ports are still not being inspected, etc.
Let's remember that Condi Rice, prior to the inauguration, got a briefing (that Sandy Berger, her predecessor attended) where she was told that terrorism, and
specifically al Qaeda, would be the most important issue the new administration would face.
Condi first lied about Berger attending, then lied about the importance placed on the intelligence, and is still lying today about it (go back to the first post in this thread and read her quote).
You're right (at least I hope so); it's all gonna come out.