@westwind,
Here they are interchangeable, Westwind.
1.To/For Zhu Xi(a famous Chinese thinker ) , a state permeated by true Confucian practices would be so internally strong.
2.For/To men accustomed to eating seven-course dinners, the change to the Alps must have been very hard indeed.
That wouldn't always be the case. One example, using a named individual in #2 would create an odd situation;
??For/To Westwind/Zhu Xi accustomed to eating seven-course dinners, the change to the Alps must have been very hard indeed. ??
For/To Westwind/Zhu Xi, who is/was accustomed to eating seven-course dinners, the change to the Alps must have been very hard indeed.
At this moment, I can't see through this to any meaningful distinction. Maybe this will trigger something in others.