1
   

Does this comparison work?

 
 
Reply Sat 20 Nov, 2010 07:09 pm
I believe " a person touching his toes" is not like "a protein folds over" at all, unless the person folds over himself. Wink

Context:

Then comes another shape change. After taking hold of the cell membrane, the protein folds over, like a person touching his toes, to fuse the cell to the virus membrane. That final calisthenic to fuse the membranes also creates an opening that allows the viral contents to invade the cell. At this stage, the protein functions as a decoy, serving only to bring on fruitless antibody responses and to distract the immune system, the authors wrote in the paper.

More:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101119120842.htm

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 1 • Views: 405 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Nov, 2010 08:22 pm
@oristarA,
It works in the larger description in the article. It's relating someone standing tall, reaching one's harms high overhead then bending at the waist and touching one's toes with one's fingertips. In other words, it's saying that one end of the viral protein attaches to a host cell, goes through a transformation, and loops around to attach the other end as well. Here's another description that calls it a "hairpin".

Quote:
The first step in fusion involves the high-affinity attachment of the CD4 binding domains of gp120 to CD4. Once gp120 is bound with the CD4 protein, the envelope complex undergoes a structural change, exposing the chemokine binding domains of gp120 and allowing them to interact with the target chemokine receptor.[76][77] This allows for a more stable two-pronged attachment, which allows the N-terminal fusion peptide gp41 to penetrate the cell membrane.[76][77] Repeat sequences in gp41, HR1 and HR2 then interact, causing the collapse of the extracellular portion of gp41 into a hairpin. This loop structure brings the virus and cell membranes close together, allowing fusion of the membranes and subsequent entry of the viral capsid.[76][77] wiki


The results of the research indicates that much of the anti-HIV antibody production is ineffective because it produces non-neutralizing antibodies (antibodies that don't destroy the virus) after the host cells are already infected. They've determined that antibodies produced before the gp41 protein completes it's looping, or hairpinning (or toe touching) are effective in neutralizing the virus before it enters the cell and begins replicating.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Nov, 2010 04:04 am
@JPB,
Cool.

Thank you very much JPB.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Does this comparison work?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/29/2024 at 02:02:55