1
   

When Censorship Goes Monkey-Fighting Bad....

 
 
Reply Wed 3 Nov, 2010 06:08 am
Quote:
The Most Ridiculous Edited-for-TV Movie Lines
Everybody loves movies with colorful language. But what happens when those films filter down to television, where their content is controlled by the FCC? Well, censors have to get really creative! Here's a collection of the most ridiculous "edited-for-TV" moments.


http://tv.gawker.com/5667748/the-most-ridiculous-edited+for+tv-movie-lines?skyline=true&s=i

Do you remember any other examples of made-for-television line redubs?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,180 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
Region Philbis
 
  2  
Reply Wed 3 Nov, 2010 07:25 am
@tsarstepan,

not off hand, but "'bleep' my dad says" irks the **** outta me...
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Nov, 2010 07:57 am
@Region Philbis,
Of all things to make into a network tv show -- profanity is deeply, deeply ingrained into that book and a huge part of what makes it funny. (The book cracked me up, haven't seen the series yet, can't imagine William Shatner making it work.)
0 Replies
 
revelette
 
  2  
Reply Wed 5 Jan, 2011 10:05 am
Normally I would be the first to cry foul at someone using racial words. However, I think censoring 'Huckleberry Finn' to get rid of the "N" words is going "Monkey Fighting bad."

Quote:
“I found myself right out of graduate school at Berkeley not wanting to pronounce that word when I was teaching either ‘Huckleberry Finn’ or ‘Tom Sawyer,’ ” he said. “And I don’t think I’m alone.”

So Gribben has produced a new, expurgated version of the two books, to be released in February. In 219 spots, the text replaces the word "nigger" with the word "slave" and also substitutes the word "Indian" for "injun" wherever that word was used.



The N-word belongs in 'Huckleberry Finn,' " insists Elon James White in Salon. "The book, which deals directly with racism, is not better served by erasing the racial slur." For White, it's all about fear – America's fear of confronting the truth about its racist past. If we allow ourselves to expurgate history (or literature), he argues, "we will find ourselves with a generation that's woefully misinformed and it will be completely our fault."





source

Later in the same source:

Quote:
In fact, Meadows points out, the Brooklyn Public Library considered banning the books due to their "coarseness, deceitfulness and mischievous practices." A librarian there wrote to Twain asking him to defend his books.

Twain responded: "I am greatly troubled by what you say. I wrote 'Tom Sawyer' & 'Huck Finn' for adults exclusively, & it always distressed me when I find that boys and girls have been allowed access to them. The mind that becomes soiled in youth can never again be washed clean. I know this by my own experience, & to this day I cherish an unappeased bitterness against the unfaithful guardians of my young life, who not only permitted but compelled me to read an unexpurgated Bible through before I was 15 years old. None can do that and ever draw a clean sweet breath again on this side of the grave."

When it comes to verbal swordplay, it's hard to best the master


I know this not government censorship, but I found it interesting nevertheless.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

The "N" Word and Classic Literature - Discussion by tsarstepan
A2K censors tags? - Discussion by hingehead
LinkedIn Censorship? - Discussion by hingehead
Muhammad Cartoonist Saga Continues! - Discussion by tsarstepan
Scholastic Book Fairs and You? - Discussion by tsarstepan
Localization in books, movies, and TV - Question by tsarstepan
Not Good Arguments - Discussion by Yalow
Ach Homo Fragilis ... - Question by Odette Sacroug
Pop entertainment and political correctness - Discussion by JGoldman10
 
  1. Forums
  2. » When Censorship Goes Monkey-Fighting Bad....
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 08:46:26