24
   

Why is it that so many A2Kers think that every topic should turn into a debate?

 
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Oct, 2010 07:46 pm
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
I don't think it was avoided...and I bet you can answer your question.
0 Replies
 
IRFRANK
 
  2  
Reply Sun 31 Oct, 2010 08:25 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
"People turn their attention away from the subject-matter in dispute
and focus on their opposing debaters, ad hominem"

That sounds like the current political environment in our country today.

The technique was proven effective by Lee Atwater with Reagan. I'm not blaming either one of them, but that is when it started. It is still effective, that's why it is so common.

In a formal debate with moderators or a civil debate, that type of activity would be stopped, but not in politics.

It's a byproduct of our very fast paced communications media and the skill of it's professionals. It's led to a very negative attitude on the part of many people and I think a very destructive path. It will take an exceptional leader to change things much, if that is even possible. People have very short attention spans and grab onto what they want to hear, and a very small percentage spend any effort at all at fact checking. Also, most people have very poor listening skills. I worked as a manager in business for years and it is very hard to convince people they need to put effort into listening. They spend their time when not talking formulating thoughts to speak when they get the chance.

Humans love to argue. And humans are very competitive. This board and others I visit have the same phenomena. I certainly participate from time to time. It's in our nature. Cooperation is rare. The winner writes the history books, etc.

Like I said, it's part of our nature. I hope we figure out how to control it to some extent before our technology gives us the power to destroy the world.
0 Replies
 
HexHammer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 03:21 am
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:

Why is it that so many A2Kers think that every topic should turn into a debate?

It seems to be the men who want to verbally battle. Is it excess testosterone?

I'm one of those who don't enjoy verbal combat. I loose interest in them once the pissing match begins.
No person in the world can cover a topic 100%, then it's in our human nature to supplement a shortcoming statemen, then some will disagree with the statemen and supplemental statemen, thus it goes on and on.
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 05:48 am
@HexHammer,
No it doesn't.
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 05:56 am
@dlowan,
yes it does Razz
dlowan
 
  0  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 06:05 am
@djjd62,
djjd62 wrote:

yes it does Razz


Not into infinity as was suggested by the language of the Hammer above.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 06:06 am
U r both rong
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 06:08 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
U r both rong
Your fonetic assistance is appreciated, Setanta.





David
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 06:16 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

U r both rong

http://search.it.online.fr/covers/wp-content/homer_the_scream.jpg
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 06:17 am
@dlowan,
Now that was pretty damned high-larious . . .
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Nov, 2010 06:21 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

Now that was pretty damned high-larious . . .


Not bad, eh? she said modestly...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How to use the new able2know - Discussion by Craven de Kere
New A2K feature requests. - Discussion by DrewDad
I'm the developer - Discussion by Nick Ashley
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
A2K censors tags? - Discussion by hingehead
New A2K Bugs - Discussion by sozobe
New A2K annoyances - Discussion by sozobe
The a2k world is changing 3: about voting - Discussion by Craven de Kere
LOST & MISPLACED A2K people. - Discussion by msolga
Welcome to the 'New' My Posts - Discussion by Nick Ashley
The "I get folksonomy" club - Discussion by Robert Gentel
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.93 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 10:36:11