@BumbleBeeBoogie,
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Robert, I think my lack of appreciation in debates is when the debaters stop civil talking about the accuracy of the topic and begin insulting , bullying, vicious name calling. That behavior ends my interest in the debate.
Am I a chicken debater?
BBB
I have a thought, small as it is, to interject here:
The purpose of reasoning is the modification of human behavior--this is by definition of the human mind to effect human behavior. Great Logicians, such as Plato realized that when you know logic, really know it, you are conversant in the use of logic through metaphor to manipulate emotion. I.e. you can use metaphor that the reader, who cannot understand the base concept the metaphor is derived from to manipulate response. One example is in religion.
That is why Plato demonstrated the construction of Mythology--it is part of a complete understanding of logic.
What we call unreasoned emotional response, may actually be, a germination of the same concept---------thus, even the maddest of responses provide one with the opportunity to develope rational defense mechanism's.