@OCCOM BILL,
OCCOM BILL wrote:This was Robert's intent when he framed the question. He certainly didn't want anyone thinking about a brutal verbal assault on a senior citizen for bravely sharing a painful event. (Actual examples are just appeals to pity, you see.)
Bill I don't know if you know this or not but you never reported any such actual examples to me. Nor did anyone else. But you started calling hawkeye a rapist and asking for him to be banned without such a scenario, and purely on the basis of your claim that he "supports rape" so no, my intent is not to reference this specific situation at all. You have been barking up this tree for months and have wanted people banned for merely having positions you find disgusting (e.g. agrote, who you would also argue should kill himself).
If you have an example of a "brutal verbal assault on a senior citizen for bravely sharing a painful event" then that may well represent a qualm with behavior and not just opinion that you can argue for and you should feel free to report or cite these examples you talk about, but what I am discussing is your crusade that started many months prior to this where
you have been nagging me to ban people solely on the basis of their positions, and not how they interact with the community.
You did start pestering me to ban people like "shorteyes" purely on the basis of him being "deranged", in your words, and it is this tired old argument that I want laid to rest here, not the latest manifestation of it with BillRM. You've been demanding we ban people like that for a long time, purely on the basis of the positions they hold.
