@kennethamy,
kennethamy wrote:Isn't Camus' answer to the question about suicide simply that since there is no good reason to do anything, there is no good reason to commit suicide? At least that is how I understand his, The Myth of Sisyphus.
Kind of.
First, i should probably clarify: when i wrote that "i like Camus' answer", i meant that i thought that the opening lines of
The Myth of Sisyphus were a good response to the OP. In hindsight, i didn't phrase it very well to make that distinction clear or signal my intent.
But i do like Camus' work in general, so i have to admit that i find your summary of Camus' essay a little, well, summary. Camus addresses the subject of suicide from a particular, and (i think) rare, vantage point. His purpose is not to address suicide as a social, psychological, or emotional phenomenon. He is trying to examine and ultimately refute the efficacy of the act of suicide as a logical and ethical response to personal nihilism.
Near the beginning of the essay he makes the distinction between meaning and value, and much of the rest of the work is given to illustrating the positive value of life denuded of a comprehensive telos. A large portion of the work is simply a practical guide on how to live within nihilism, and it is one of the few examples i know of demonstrating an invigorating egress from nihilism from within nihilism itself (the few other examples i can think of are all novels).
i don't know how helpful
The Myth of Sisyphus would be to the odd suicidal "man on the street", the likelihood is "not very"-- since nihilism is probably not their problem, and if they
are on the street they may have already jumped. (Oh! suicide humor--i am disgusting.) But i still think that it is a pretty profound piece of writing, and i've come to appreciate it more the longer i've lived with it.
hmmm...i felt like my first post in this thread sounded pretty pompous and pretentious. i'm afraid my follow-up isn't much better. Sorry to derail the thread further.