...no I find it amazing that you don't seam to understand the basic down to earth line of reasoning as the summarized and simplified one I just did regarding what "religions" are and where they are born from.
OK I am cool with your response and I would like to address it accordingly.
I do need to add that I am not able to address it at this moment like I wish I could because I had a power outage and my screen is bright pink and is throwing me off as I have not been able to correct it as yet. I think my monitor is bad but I have not yet had time to correct the problem.
you don't seam to understand the basic down to earth line of reasoning as the summarized and simplified one I just did regarding what "religions" are and where they are born from.
So this is it? The arc of the covenant so to speak?
I can agree but only to a point but keep in mind that I am talking somewhat out of my ass because I have not been able to read and address this issue because I have not had the clarity to do so yet.
. you don't have a clue on what are the origins of symbolic reasoning and mythology as means of explanation for the questions that arise with intelligence in mankind...you see intelligence's emergence doesn't bring clarity wrapped up in a present all at once...at first it is smart enough to wonder but not disciplined enough to organize plausible answers...yet answers are socially immediately NEEDED such that symbolic packed low resolution answers on the origin of power are provided in an understandable manner to group majority's, because philosophy essentially it is a demand to understand "who" and "what" is power, as well as where it comes from..
I am not able to address this issue as of yet "like I would like to but I find no harm in asking this question. Is this empirical data that you are sharing with me? I do apologize but I cant not handle the colors of my page and when I correct the problems that I am having with my computer I will address your comment further.