Can Nobody Exist?

To exist is a positive statement...nobody instead is a negative!

Hi Ken!

Positives and negatives can't co-exist. That is why there is so much anger and conflict at the QM scale.

Kind regards!
Mark...

mark noble wrote:

Hi Ken!

Positives and negatives can't co-exist. That is why there is so much anger and conflict at the QM scale.

Kind regards!
Mark...

And, what would that have to do with it, even if it were true.

The question is whether the statement, that nobody exists is ever true, and of course, it was true before there were people. Therefore, it is sometimes true that nobody exists. QED. Furthermore, it might be true if an asteroid wiped out all human life. Therefore, even if it is not true, it might be true. QED.

kennethamy wrote:

mark noble wrote:

Hi Ken!

Positives and negatives can't co-exist. That is why there is so much anger and conflict at the QM scale.

Kind regards!
Mark...

And, what would that have to do with it, even if it were true.

The question is whether the statement, that nobody exists is ever true, and of course, it was true before there were people. Therefore, it is sometimes true that nobody exists. QED. Furthermore, it might be true if an asteroid wiped out all human life. Therefore, even if it is not true, it might be true. QED.

Hi Ken!

The question is 'Can Nobody Exist?' There is no 'ever' in the equation. There is an absence of 'ever' intentionally.

How can you prove (multi-dimensionally) that there was a time when people didn't exist? You are restricting yourself to scientific boundaries in relation to earth's history.

Everything that has form - And everything does have form, is classified as having 'body'.

When people say, "This wine has no body", what they are saying is nobody exists in this wine, but the statement is clearly false. Don't you agree?

Kind regards!
Mark...

I don't tell fairy tales.

If I did, I would be at fairytales.com.

mark noble wrote:

kennethamy wrote:

mark noble wrote:

Hi Ken!

Positives and negatives can't co-exist. That is why there is so much anger and conflict at the QM scale.

Kind regards!
Mark...

And, what would that have to do with it, even if it were true.

The question is whether the statement, that nobody exists is ever true, and of course, it was true before there were people. Therefore, it is sometimes true that nobody exists. QED. Furthermore, it might be true if an asteroid wiped out all human life. Therefore, even if it is not true, it might be true. QED.

Hi Ken!

The question is 'Can Nobody Exist?' There is no 'ever' in the equation. There is an absence of 'ever' intentionally.

How can you prove (multi-dimensionally) that there was a time when people didn't exist? You are restricting yourself to scientific boundaries in relation to earth's history.

Everything that has form - And everything does have form, is classified as having 'body'.

When people say, "This wine has no body", what they are saying is nobody exists in this wine, but the statement is clearly false. Don't you agree?

Kind regards!
Mark...

When people say, "This wine has no body", what they are saying is nobody exists in this wine, but the statement is clearly false. Don't you agree?

Only if you were joking, and although I would think that anyone who said such a thing was joking (or, at least, trying to make a joke) I have to say that I am not sure about you.

kennethamy wrote:

mark noble wrote:

kennethamy wrote:

mark noble wrote:

Hi Ken!

Positives and negatives can't co-exist. That is why there is so much anger and conflict at the QM scale.

Kind regards!
Mark...

And, what would that have to do with it, even if it were true.

The question is whether the statement, that nobody exists is ever true, and of course, it was true before there were people. Therefore, it is sometimes true that nobody exists. QED. Furthermore, it might be true if an asteroid wiped out all human life. Therefore, even if it is not true, it might be true. QED.

Hi Ken!

The question is 'Can Nobody Exist?' There is no 'ever' in the equation. There is an absence of 'ever' intentionally.

How can you prove (multi-dimensionally) that there was a time when people didn't exist? You are restricting yourself to scientific boundaries in relation to earth's history.

Everything that has form - And everything does have form, is classified as having 'body'.

When people say, "This wine has no body", what they are saying is nobody exists in this wine, but the statement is clearly false. Don't you agree?

Kind regards!
Mark...

When people say, "This wine has no body", what they are saying is nobody exists in this wine, but the statement is clearly false. Don't you agree?

Only if you were joking, and although I would think that anyone who said such a thing was joking (or, at least, trying to make a joke) I have to say that I am not sure about you.

Hi Ken!

I know you are not sure about me - As is everyone, me included.
There are a lot of things you are not sure about, so don't let it bother you.

The wine-thing came into my head and I chose to add it for the sake of humour. It has nothing to do with the fact that nobody cannot exist. For, whatever you, I or Walt disney even, apply the term 'nobody' to, and in English, Mandarin or space-alien lingo (Hexhammer's invention), must be in such a way as to state that no thing = no body (Nothing = Nobody). And, if nothing is nobody and nobody is nothing, nobody cannot exist, because nothing cannot exist.

Ergo, If nobody existed, nothing would exist, instantly denying the existence of nobody. So the only way that nobody can exist is if nothing exists. Nothing cannot exist because it is a non-existant notion (NEN). As soon as it exists it becomes something, for something must always exist. And if something ALWAYS exists, nothing can never exist.

Kind regards!
Mark...

So does every other living thing. You included.