Lest we forget

@izzythepush,

izzythepush wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

(Note that Setanta did not meet me at age 11.)

So you're not accusing him of being one of the 'girls' in drag then? Phew!

Phew! is right!!!

0 Replies

@Setanta,

Setanta wrote:

Don't dare impugn me honor, boy.

Well, I can 't very well challenge him to a duel (other than truthful words).

OK, Setanta:
I inquire of u now:
do u allege that girls of 17 and of 23 CANNOT have erotic interest in boys of 11,

or

do u allege that thay coud not have been attracted to me PERSONALLY,
when I was 11 ????

I 'm pretty sure that the REAL REASON
for Setanta 's denunciation of me is my freedom loving philosophy (filosofy);
i.e., if the exact same post had been forthcoming from someone
of SETANTA's beliefs, then he 'd not have called its author a liar. Its just whose ox is gored and Setanta is insincere.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

do u allege that girls of 17 and of 23 CANNOT have erotic interest in boys of 11,

Im on the road for a few days so I seem to have missed the connection that the above statement apparently has with the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

A girl of 23 would be guilty of statutory rape if she acted on any part of her "erotic" fantasies over an 11 year old boy.
In common parlence, she would be considered "creepy" and a skeevy pervert, punisheable as a felony is most states (probably not West Virginia though).

I think Dave is quite familiar with these terms.

3 Replies

@farmerman,

Well, it is true that he claims to be a lawyer.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

Quote:

A girl of 23 would be guilty of statutory rape if she acted on any part of her "erotic" fantasies over an 11 year old boy.

Just doing some rough math from what I know of Dave and his age, my guess is that would have happened somewhere around 1955, if my reckonin' is good. I suspect that there was such a law around that time, Farmer, but I don't think that such a she would have been considered all that bad by a lot of folks.

Many parents around that time would never have considered making any fuss over such an affair.

1 Reply

@JTT,

Youve just given me waay too much more information about dave than im giving a rats ass about.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

David wrote:

do u allege that girls of 17 and of 23 CANNOT have erotic interest in boys of 11,

farmerman wrote:

Im on the road for a few days so I seem to have missed the connection that the above statement
apparently has with the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Well put, Farmer; I love it. Good sense of humor.

farmerman wrote:

A girl of 23 would be guilty of statutory rape
if she acted on any part of her "erotic" fantasies over an 11 year old boy.

1. That was long b4 the "statutory rape" laws applied toward boys.
"Rape" was defined as a crime by vaginal penetration.
It was not "statutory rape"; it was GETTING LUCKY.

2. For SURE, I 'd have had no respect for that law
if it had existed. If I were a boy NOW, I 'd reject it with contempt, and protect the chick.

farmerman wrote:

In common parlence, she would be considered "creepy" and a skeevy pervert,

I did not see it that way.
I don 't believe that either of them did, either.
We were in control of the situation; that is what mattered.
Note that, in my Golden Years: I am pleased to have had
this hedonic adventure and see no error in it.
No harm came to either of the girls, nor to me.

farmerman wrote:

punisheable as a felony is most states (probably not West Virginia though).

I think Dave is quite familiar with these terms.

See above.

David

2 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

1. That was long b4 the "statutory rape" laws applied toward boys.

As a matter of curiosity, Dave, when did the laws change to include underage males?

1 Reply

@JTT,

David wrote:

1. That was long b4 the "statutory rape" laws applied toward boys.

JTT wrote:

As a matter of curiosity, Dave, when did the laws change to include underage males?

That is unclear in my memory, J.
Of course, it varied among the different States.
I 'm not sure that even now, it applies in all of the States, nor how many.
It used to apply in none of them, for centuries.

The closest that I can come, in a very general way,
is to estimate: about 30 or 40 years ago.

David

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

[No harm came to either of the girls, nor to me.

I don't know about that.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

OmSigDAVID wrote:

[No harm came to either of the girls, nor to me.

izzythepush wrote:

I don't know about that.

Explain ??

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Having read your posts, I think it's fair to say they are the product of a distempered brain. Whether or not that is the result of being given a J Arthur Rank when you were underage, I cannot say.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

izzythepush wrote:

Having read your posts, I think it's fair to say they are the product of a distempered brain.
Whether or not that is the result of being given a J Arthur Rank when you were underage, I cannot say.

Lemme get this straight:
Dr. Izzy has diagnosed that I contracted distemper at a J. Arthur Rank movie ?
I did not take either girl to the movies.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

I never mentioned movies, a J. Arthur is an example of rhyming slang. I even gave you the rhyming bit, Rank, hoping against hope that you may be able to work it out. Such hope is folorn.

2 Replies

@izzythepush,

If you wish to refer to me as a doctor, I would prefer you used the name Benway, which is in keeping with my A2K name.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

izzythepush wrote:

I never mentioned movies, a J. Arthur is an example of rhyming slang. I even gave you the rhyming bit, Rank, hoping against hope that you may be able to work it out. Such hope is folorn.

U thought (thawt) I took them to the Bank??

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

No David, it's a rude word.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

izzythepush wrote:

If you wish to refer to me as a doctor,
I would prefer you used the name Benway, which is in keeping with my A2K name.

This is an anonymous forum.
R u abandoning anonymity??
I did not mean to cause u to do THAT, Dr. Benway.
What is your specialty ?

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Appendectomies during bullfights, I get almost as big a cheer as the matador.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

izzythepush wrote:

No David, it's a rude word.

U thawt thay sank in a tank??
Maybe I know too many POLITE words. I don 't get it.

David

1 Reply

Lest we forget

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know