@izzythepush,
It was a simple scene:
when I was 11, I spent some time in California,
away from my home in Arizona. I used busses in between.
While I was away from home, there were 2 occasions
(that Setanta
implies involved my virginity)
on which I got lucky, 1 with a girl of 17
and another with a girl in her early 20s (23, if I remember).
After I mentioned these adventures,
Setanta called me a liar
(directly or indirectly; I don't remember at the moment).
He implied that
EITHER,
I was so bereft of any attractive quality
at age 11 that
no female coud
POSSIBLY
have approached me with libidinous motives,
OR
that girls and women cannot possibly have erotic interests in boys of 11.
He failed to express his ideas beyond calling me a liar;
i.e., he did not explain his reasoning.
Obviously, his position is logically untenable.
(Note that Setanta did
not meet me at age 11.)
He subsequently
FALSELY accused me of
changing the details
of my descriptions of these events.
David