Lest we forget

@oralloy,

I tag what I think.
You see I know there's NO point in getting into a "debate" with you 5 morons, so I don't waste my time trying.
You are all one dimensional idiots who are incapable of debate, so why bother.
You have you "Oralboy the Israeli sycophantic", then H2zero the retard, then Gungasneak the racist,
Hawkshit the drama queen and of course Omsig the gun obsessed armchair general.
A pathetic pentagon of piss ants.

So I'll keep on tagging in the hope it annoys you.

1 Reply

@eurocelticyankee,

eurocelticyankee wrote:

I tag what I think.

Yes, but your inability to form an intelligent viewpoint means all you do is engage in childish namecalling.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

You see I know there's NO point in getting into a "debate" with you 5 morons, so I don't waste my time trying.

No point mainly because you are incapable joining a civilized debate.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

You are all one dimensional idiots who are incapable of debate

Er, no. That is YOUR role.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

You have you "Oralboy the Israeli sycophantic", then H2zero the retard, then Gungasneak the racist,
Hawkshit the drama queen and of course Omsig the gun obsessed armchair general.
A pathetic pentagon of piss ants.

Like I said, incapable of anything other than childish namecalling.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

So I'll keep on tagging in the hope it annoys you.

Your childish namecalling is not all that annoying.

It was worth stripping your anonymity though, to make it clear just who was putting up the childish tags.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

You know what dickhead, I'm not even bothering to read anything you say
because I know it's the same old tired rhetoric. Blah blah blah.

Let me guess, I'm a nazi, isn't that one of your usual slurs.
You pathetic moron.

2 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

( Are u obsessed with expressing yourself in run-on sentences??? )

Dave, you've really gotta stop discussing things that you know nothing about.

1 Reply

@eurocelticyankee,

eurocelticyankee wrote:

You know what dickhead, I'm not even bothering to read anything you say

Liar.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

Let me guess, I'm a nazi

That's not a guess. You know very well that you are.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

isn't that one of your usual slurs.

Depends on whether I'm replying to a Nazi.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

You pathetic moron.

You trash shouldn't run around falsely accusing your betters of your own pathetic stupidity.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Now now Blow-Job boy don't be getting your panties in a twist, you'll give yourself a heart attack and then who will be around to defend Israel.
Remember they need you "The destroyer of nations" to defend them against them pesky Palestinians or what does your racist buddy gungasneak call them Palasavages.
Crawl back into the gutter where you belong you MORON.

I've noticed as well you're a bit of a last word freak. Rolling Eyes

Idiot.

Anyway I'll have to leave you for a while, a higher form of life than you requires my attention, my dog needs walking. Laughing

1 Reply

@eurocelticyankee,

eurocelticyankee wrote:

Now now Blow-Job boy don't be getting your panties in a twist

Your childish namecalling suffers from your lack of intelligence. You aren't very good at it.

Not that childish namecalling is something anyone would want to strive to be good at (I hope), but you're really really bad at it.

0 Replies

I wonder if it is possible to submit tags for abuse reports?

The childish namecalling was silly and harmless, but now he has so many tags added that the topic is no longer able to be listed in the proper groups.

2 Replies

@oralloy,

Add more tags if you wish. It's a numbers game with tags. More repeats of the same tag, the more likely it is to be listed.

BTW, we here in Moderator Land truly despise the graffitti tags. They do nothing for the site whatsoever. This is not just a statement about this particular topic, but about all topics and all tags.

I am, also, voting this topic down (no offense to the topic creator or any respondents). I just want it cleared from my listings. So, if anyone has a response to me (and I cannot imagine what it would be, beyond, perhaps, someone asking for something that can be supplied via a standard request to the Help Desk), kindly use the Help Desk. Thanks much.

0 Replies

@oralloy,

BJboy, So I don't have to listen to you whinging, I'll remove the tags.

But I tell you this I'd rather be having a bit of fun being childish than come out with the vitriolic and twisted crap you come out with.

1 Reply

@JTT,

David wrote:

( Are u obsessed with expressing yourself in run-on sentences??? )

JTT wrote:

Dave, you've really gotta stop discussing things that you know nothing about.

I know that if 2 sentences r combined into 1,
then it shoud be punctuated to indicate that fact.

David

0 Replies

@eurocelticyankee,

eurocelticyankee wrote:

You know what dickhead, I'm not even bothering to read anything you say
because I know it's the same old tired rhetoric. Blah blah blah.

Let me guess, I'm a nazi, isn't that one of your usual slurs. . . .

In tags, I 've been accused of being a nazi,
REGARDLESS of my being anti-collectivist and anti-authoritarian
and not anti-Jewish. Presumably, those lies came from u.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Dave I've a question for you, you know all these robbers and thief's
whom you delight in hearing of their deaths. I get your point of view, rather
them than an innocent home owner.
Well would you consider the final solution for these scum, after all their
a drain on society and wouldn't we all be better off without these "people"?
I mean I know a lot of them have mental problems, drug problems and of
course a lot of them have endured terrible upbringings, broken homes,
abusive parents, a lot of them have been physically and sexually abused by
those who were meant to protect them, that's the world we live in and of course
lets not forget the poverty and lack of guidance and prospects.
But all that aside, that's not our problem, they mess with us and we shoot
them and that's that, isn't that right Dave and then we celebrate their killing.
So Dave would it that much of a stretch for you to endorse the final solution?,
get a few ovens going Dave, what you reckon?

Oh and just as a matter of interest being anti-Jewish isn't necessary for being
a Nazi.

1 Reply

@eurocelticyankee,

I 'm going to treat this
as if it were a serious question, or series of questions.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

Dave I've a question for you, you know all these robbers and thief's
whom you delight in hearing of their deaths. I get your point of view,
rather them than an innocent home owner.

Yes; I'm pro-victim of violent predator.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

Well would you consider the final solution for these scum, after all their
a drain on society and wouldn't we all be better off without these "people"?

REGARDLESS of whether we 'd all be better off without them, thay have an INDIVIDUAL RIGHT to live
until, by their misconduct, thay forfeit that right by violating,
or attempting to violate, the right of their victim.
The final solution (e.g., 2 rounds of hollowpointed .44 ammo
into the large intestine) becomes justified by their violently predatory aggression.
THAT justifies the defense of self.
To harm them before that 'd be immoral and illegal.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

I mean I know a lot of them have mental problems, drug problems and of
course a lot of them have endured terrible upbringings, broken homes,
abusive parents, a lot of them have been physically and sexually abused by
those who were meant to protect them, that's the world we live in and of course
lets not forget the poverty and lack of guidance and prospects.
But all that aside, that's not our problem,

Good point, its not.
Their active, predatory misconduct IS our problem.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

they mess with us and we shoot
them and that's that,

Your point is well taken
(assuming that "mess" = predatory violence).

eurocelticyankee wrote:

isn't that right Dave

It IS right.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

and then we celebrate their killing.

Ideally, yes.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

So Dave would it that much of a stretch for you to endorse the final solution?

When it is justified by the predator's violent attack upon the victim,
as of that time: yes.
Before then, he has not become a predator.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

Oh and just as a matter of interest being anti-Jewish isn't necessary for being a Nazi.

I believe that u r in error.
That was an integral part of that philosophy.
The Nazis actively USED that as an arguing point, in their efforts to get elected.
Without that element, u 'd have something different, something LESS than it was.
I dunno, but I suspect that if an applicant for Nazi Party membership
mentioned that he was not anti-Jewish, I suspect that he 'd have been rejected.
Note that I do not pretend to any great expertise in that philosophy (filosofy).
That was up to their theoreticians to decide.

Around 1961, I founded a chapter of Young Americans for Freedom.
If an applicant for membership had said that he was not anti-communist,
he 'd have no chance of being admitted to membership.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

You want to have you're cake and eat it too. You contradict yourself,
you use terms like IMMORAL and ILLEGAL and then go on to advocate summary
execution, not only advocate it you celebrate it, wallow in it.
Now I'm pretty sure summary execution isn't LEGAL although I do accept
extenuating circumstances, but where you lose me completely is your quite
disgusting celebration of the killing of another human being.
Does that seem MORAL to you?. This is the Nazi in you talking and I have
no doubt that if it were legal you would love to exterminate all the low
life's you despise.

A basic tenet of Nazi ideology was eugenics, they used the principles of Eugenics to convince others that Jews, Gypsies, Homosexuals, the retarded and mentally unstable were the source of Germany's problems. The Nazis sought to exterminate or impose exclusionary segregation upon "degenerate" and "asocial" groups that included Jews, homosexuals, Romani, blacks, the physically and mentally handicapped, Jehovah's Witnesses and political opponents.

So though I agree the Nazi's had a particular hatred of the Jewish people,
there were a lot more poor unfortunate people that fell under their umbrella
of hatred. I digress,
Dave do you think it MORAL and acceptable to gleefully celebrate the killing
of another human being even if that person was a criminal.

1 Reply

@eurocelticyankee,

eurocelticyankee wrote:

You want to have you're cake and eat it too. You contradict yourself,

I deny that.
Your assertion is FALSE.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

you use terms like IMMORAL and ILLEGAL and then go on to advocate summary
execution, not only advocate it you celebrate it, wallow in it.

Yes. I cheer and celebrate when I read of victims killing their predators.
YIPPEEEEE!!!!!
That is good justice and the world is a safer place for me and the rest of us! HOT DIGGETTY DOG!!!!!

If it were up to me,
EVERY TIME that a violent predator (human or not) inflicts himself
upon his victims, that predator woud fail to survive the event.
The victim shoud get a tax credit (if he kills the predator)
for valuable services rendered to the decent people.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

Now I'm pretty sure summary execution isn't LEGAL

I don 't understand. Are we now discussing death warrants??????
How did we get into that???

eurocelticyankee wrote:

although I do accept
extenuating circumstances, but where you lose me completely

Please understand: losing u (completely or otherwise)
is PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE and that will have NO effect
upon my understanding of morality nor of legality.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

is your quite disgusting celebration of the killing of another human being.
Does that seem MORAL to you?

It DOES. Yes.
Its very good.
Its hedonic, too.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

This is the Nazi in you talking

I vigorously oppose ALL forms of socialism, including the national kind.
I oppose all collectivism (except only in military service)
and I oppose authoritarianism, SUPPORTING Individualism & libertarianism.
I wish that the First Congress, in 1789, in adopting the American Flag,
had put a flatulent mosquito in its low, left corner
whose gaseous extrusions represent the jurisdiction of government.
I am not anti-Jewish. If that be Nazism, then let us make the most of it.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

and I have no doubt
that if it were legal you would love to exterminate
all the low life's you despise.

I 'll take your word for it,
but let us be aware that by informing us of your doubts,
u make a statement about yourself, about YOUR fantasies, not about me.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

A basic tenet of Nazi ideology was eugenics,

We can discuss that,
without reference to Nazism.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

they used the principles of Eugenics to convince others that Jews, Gypsies, Homosexuals, the retarded and mentally unstable were the source of Germany's problems. The Nazis sought to exterminate or impose exclusionary segregation upon "degenerate" and "asocial" groups that included Jews, homosexuals, Romani, blacks, [in Germany, in the 1920s???] the physically and mentally handicapped, Jehovah's Witnesses and political opponents.

So though I agree the Nazi's had a particular hatred of the Jewish people,
there were a lot more poor unfortunate people that fell under their umbrella
of hatred. I digress,

U do.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

Dave do you think it MORAL and acceptable to gleefully celebrate
the killing of another human being even if that person was a criminal.

Yes.
I thought I covered that already,
but lest there be any doubt:
I believe that it is very moral to celebrate
the defensive killing of violent criminals.

3 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

I believe that it is very moral to celebrate
the defensive killing of violent criminals.

Your idea of morality is as warped as your obsession with firearms.
I believe you're a sad being with little or no humanity left in him, you
probably lie in bed at night alone with your finger on the trigger praying
some unfortunate will choose your home to rob giving you the opportunity
to be judge and jury, to let you satisfy your sick sadistic Nazi side.

Don't go on about morals, predators and legality, all your interested in
guns and guns killing people. You sad sad person.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Incidentally what about the predatory lawyer who overcharges his clients
and then lets them spend years in prison because of his incompetence and
what about the predatory banker who destroys the lives of thousands of
innocent people because of his personal greed, shouldn't they also be
summarily shot, according to your code of ethics?.
Then there's the college kid who gets drunk and assaults another kid, well?
should he be summarily executed too?.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

It's funny Dave I've been reading some of your posts and I've
come to the conclusion you are actually quite insane.
This unhealthy obsession with firearms is disturbing. I see your
latest is gunnery classes in schools, what now?, getting a little
Youth movement together. Who else had that idea?, oh yeah, Hitler.
I wonder did you ever serve with the military or are you as I suspect
a toy soldier, an armchair general.
I was a gunner in the navy and that's where I was taught gunnery, not in
school. School is for science, maths, arts, etc, so lay off the kids Dave
and keep your gun obsession to yourself. YOU NUT.

2 Replies

@eurocelticyankee,

David wrote:

I believe that it is very moral to celebrate
the defensive killing of violent criminals.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

Your idea of morality is as warped as your obsession with firearms.
I believe you're a sad being

Coming from U,
that does not matter much.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

with little or no humanity left in him, you
probably lie in bed at night alone with your finger on the trigger praying
some unfortunate will choose your home to rob giving you the opportunity
to be judge and jury, to let you satisfy your sick sadistic Nazi side.

(U are obsessed with Nazism.
Like communism, it has been defeated; hence, it means little to me.)
I don't want that to happen
because gunfire within my house might endanger my property,
e.g., the 7O inch HD TV in my bedroom.
Everything is fine, just the way it IS.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

Don't go on about morals, predators and legality,

I 'll DO whatever I damn well PLEASE.

eurocelticyankee wrote:

all your interested in
guns and guns killing people.

I am "interested" in PERSONAL FREEDOM, in rugged INDIVIDUALISM,
in Fonetic Spelling, in the Mental Survival of somatic death,
in Vertebrate Paleontology, in Astrophysics,
in Cosmology and in the reconciliation of Quantum Mechanics
with Einstein 's Relativity found in Membrane Theory in 11 dimensions.
I am "interested" in my local Mensa Fine Dining SIG,
the Opulent Mensan Special Interest Group,
whose goal is to have as much FUN as possible,
which I founded about 3O years ago.
I am "interested" in immunity from taxation
after the first half million dollars of annual income.
I am interested in surprizing people (especially children)
by thrusting CASH upon them when thay do not expect it (e.g., dropping it from passing hot air balloons).

I LOVE the Space Program.
In addition to collecting guns
I collect gold coins, in which I am "INTERESTED".

eurocelticyankee wrote:

You sad sad person.

I am HAPPY.
I get HAPPIER each time that I hear of a violent predator
(human or not) getting killed by his victim.

David

0 Replies

Lest we forget

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know