@Fil Albuquerque,
Fil Albuquerque wrote:
I simply meant Rex that adaptation and differentiation in design don't oppose symmetry...you have to consider environmental background as a major factor of selection also. Symmetry is considered after and not before major functions are in place...what good is a brown polar bear in the middle of the ice...no matter how symmetric he looks...yeah, its complex but still holds...
To me symmetry is governed by natural attraction. Natural attraction denotes a certain kind of predisposition to magnetism. Even metals have their predisposition to lose electrons where many other elements absorb electrons. You add this magnetism to a vast environment of circumstancialism and things line up in the symmetry they carry within. People become what they are inside, they fulfill their internal struggle with passions, attractions, needs, wants, desires, emotions etc... that through struggle great things are accomplished that distinguish them from those who are still on their journey of self realization...
