1
   

U.S. military ousts gay linguists

 
 
au1929
 
Reply Wed 3 Dec, 2003 11:47 am
U.S. military ousts gay linguists


Dec. 3 — Cathleen Glover was cleaning the pool at the Sri Lankan ambassador’s residence recently when she heard the sound of Arabic drifting through the trees. Glover earned $11 an hour working for a pool-maintenance company, skimming leaves and testing chlorine levels in the backyards of Washington. No one knew about her past. But sometimes the past found her.

GLOVER RECOGNIZED the sound instantly. It was the afternoon call to prayer coming from a mosque on Massachusetts Avenue. She held still, picking out familiar words and translating them in her head.
She learned Arabic at the Defense Language Institute (DLI), the military’s premier language school, in Monterey, Calif. Her timing as a soldier was fortuitous: Around her graduation last year, a Government Accounting Office study reported that the Army faced a critical shortage of linguists needed to translate intercepts and interrogate suspects in the war on terrorism.
“I was what the country needed,” Glover said.
She was, and she wasn't. Glover is gay. She mastered Arabic but couldn't handle living a double life under the military policy known as “don't ask, don't tell.”
After two years in the Army, Glover, 26, voluntarily wrote a statement acknowledging her homosexuality.
Confronted with a shortage of Arabic interpreters and its policy banning openly gay service members, the Pentagon had a choice to make.
Which is how former Spec. Glover came to be cleaning pools instead of sitting in the desert, translating Arabic for the U.S. government.
In the past two years, the Department of Defense has discharged 37 linguists from the Defense Language Institute for being gay. Like Glover, many studied Arabic. At a time of heightened need for intelligence specialists, 37 linguists were rendered useless because of their homosexuality.
Historically, military leaders have argued that allowing gays to serve would hurt unit cohesion and recruiting efforts, and infringe on the privacy rights of heterosexuals. In 1993, at the urging of President Clinton, Congress agreed to soften the outright ban on gays in the military with a policy that came to be known as “don’t ask, don’t tell,” which allowed them to serve as long as they kept their sexual orientation secret.
On its 10th anniversary, “don’t ask, don’t tell” exists in a vastly changed nation. In 1993, there was no “Will & Grace,” no gay Jack on “Dawson’s Creek,” no gay-themed Miller Lite commercials. In 1993, fewer than a dozen U.S. high schools had Gay-Straight Alliance organizations. Today, there are almost 2,000. In 1993, fewer than a dozen Fortune 500 companies offered health benefits to domestic partners.
It would seem that the Army is cutting off their nose to spite their face. On the one hand the decry that fact that they do not have enough Arabic speakers in Iraq. While on the other hand they for what I can only term as an arcaich reason refuse to use the services of people on hand. What do you think of the stand taken by the army? What is your opinion regarding the armed services policy regarding gays in service?


http://www.msnbc.com/news/1000537.asp?0cl=c3
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 877 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
Gromit
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2003 11:29 am
The compromise position of don't ask don't tell is unsound in many ways. It is not good when people have to lie about their very natures. It is not good to treat American citizens who want to serve their country as second class citizens. It is very hypocritical too.

America is a very homophobic country and needs to evolve.

The hysterical reasons I have heard for morale problems and shower embarrassment are ludicrous. These are people who must endure severe physical and emotional hardships in battle conditions... and they can't tolerate someone looking at them? Give me a break! They are the real insecure pansies if that is the reason.

If they say you can be gay but just don't act on it, I say... they can be ignorant homophobes but just don't show it or act upon it and thereby interfere with the liberties of others.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Dec, 2003 02:28 pm
Gay ex-military officers speak out

Thursday, December 11, 2003 Posted: 1:35 PM EST (1835 GMT)
(CNN) -- It's been 10 years since "don't ask, don't tell" became the policy for gay people in the military. Three high-ranking officers, now retired and now revealing that they are gay, are among those against the policy.
CNN's Bill Hemmer talked to the retired officers on Thursday to find out more.
HEMMER: Retired Brigadier General Keith Kerr is in San Francisco, Retired Rear Admiral Alan Steinman is in Dupont, Washington. Retired Brigadier General Virgil Richard is with us today from Austin, Texas.
And gentlemen, good morning to you.
We want to start with General Kerr in San Francisco.
Why now?
KERR: Good morning.
It's the 10th anniversary of "don't ask, don't tell" and the three of us think that "don't ask, don't tell" is not working. It prohibits and discourages loyal Americans who want to serve their country from doing so, because they have to lie and conceal their personal life. And Americans who are interested in serving their country should be given the opportunity to do so.
HEMMER: Let me ask Admiral Steinman .... what do you want changed then?
STEINMAN: Well, we'd like the law to be repealed by Congress. I mean we think the "don't ask, don't tell" law -- and it is a law, not just a military policy -- [should] be repealed. Furthermore, we would like the current policy on anti-harassment against gays and lesbians to immediately be enforced. That can be done without changing the law and we feel that harassment continues in the military now, even though gays and lesbians are permitted by the law to serve honorably. Oftentimes, the workplace is hostile and sometimes violent, and we think that needs to be addressed, and that could be done even without repealing the law.
HEMMER: The military sent us a statement. I'll read it and put it on the screen for our viewers and then we'll get a response from you gentlemen. "The DOD homosexual conduct policy is based in law" -- the Department of Defense -- "Congress has stated that homosexual conduct poses risks to unit cohesion and readiness. The Department continues to work tirelessly to administer that law in a manner that is both fair and consistent."
To General Richard, then, how is the military less of a fighting force with this policy?
RICHARD: Well, I think the real issue is how soldiers do their jobs, not their sexuality. The policy is not working and it's not working because, as an example, in The Washington Post. last week, the GAO [General Accounting Office] found that the Army and the services are short many linguists and we kicked out 37 over the last couple of years that could have helped our Army. And it's just a waste of resources of what we're doing with gay soldiers. They don't enlist, they don't re-enlist and we're just wasting the taxpayers' money.
HEMMER: All three of you gentlemen have told me it's not working, the policy needs to be dropped and the fact of the matter is you believe that right now the military is not well-served by this. It appears to me from a distance all three of you men have had very successful military careers. You're now retired. It seems, General Kerr, that it's worked well for the three of you.
Am I wrong?
KERR: It worked very well for me. The Army made me a much better person. It gave me education, training, contact and the ability to serve with wonderfully talented officers and learn from them. So I'm so proud of my Army service and what the Army has done for me. And that opportunity ought to be available to all Americans.
My personal belief is that one can no more choose their sexual orientation than they can choose the color of their eyes, their hair or their full genetic makeup.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Dec, 2003 01:38 am
Army ousting gay linguists?

That is certainly a silly thing to do.

Now how are they going to translate the lyrics of Judy Garland records into Farsi, Urdu and Mayan?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » U.S. military ousts gay linguists
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 04:24:12