jespah
 
  4  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 09:53 am
@xris,
... or, he could be busy with other things.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  3  
Reply Sun 25 Jul, 2010 04:30 pm
@xris,
xris wrote:

I know the reasoning , I just oppose the action that has been taken. No communication , no argument., do debate..very philosophical.


What is it you oppose, the actions of the few that abused this forum and caused the problem, or the temporary actions that were taken to prevent further abuse and expense to this forum?

Or, is it that you oppose Robert's continuing efforts to respond to complaints and clone the old PhilForum software and archives to establish a private PhilForum group subsidiary of A2k rather than continue to argue about your disagreement with how he chose to protect A2K from those who abuse it?

xris
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 03:13 am
@Butrflynet,
Lets be clear on what the abuse was first ..spell it out so we can all be clear because what I believe to have happened and the response does not appear to be rational?
ossobuco
 
  4  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 03:47 am
@xris,
Listen, xris. If you wanted individual attention, not warranted in my estimation, but still, if you did, you could have clicked on Contact Us on the bottom of the page.

You expect Robert reads all threads? Are you ******* kidding? The man has a life, and reading threads, which he does once in a while, is only a breather for him, and the rest of us enjoy it that way.

And now you are all pissed since he hasn't responded to your very own thread? Your picayune whine? You are a pissant who has started a thread as a taunt. Why on earth would a site owner respond to you if he ran across the thread?

Get over yourself. Or, as suggested earlier, look at the easy answer provided to your question earlier.

Please do not assume that my vitriol is Robert's, only I am responsible for it. Yes, me, it is my vitriol, not his. Shut up, or just click on Contact Us at the bottom of the page.
msolga
 
  4  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 04:01 am
@xris,
Quote:
Lets be clear on what the abuse was first ..spell it out so we can all be clear because what I believe to have happened and the response does not appear to be rational?


xris, it has been explained ... at length ... a few weeks ago. On a couple of threads, as I recall. Did you somehow miss those threads at the time?

I really don't wish to be rude, but you are being rather tedious, going on & on & on, on this thread. Anyone who was paying any attention at the time knows what occurred & why.
ossobuco
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 04:06 am
@msolga,
Well, that's the diff between Msolga and me. I'm the clear bitch.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 04:07 am
@ossobuco,
You are? Surprised
Region Philbis
 
  2  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 04:08 am
@xris,
Quote:
Lets be clear on what the abuse was first ..spell it out so we can all be clear because what I believe to have happened and the response does not appear to be rational?
start reading here...
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 04:11 am
@ossobuco,
Not only is my vitriol my own, but all you asked is available on a2k if you just open your eyes and look.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 04:13 am
@msolga,
Snort, msolga, I don't know what that emoticon means, though I suppose I qualify for it.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 04:32 am
@ossobuco,
It's a sort of surprised <gasp>, osso! Very Happy
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 04:39 am
@msolga,
K, thanks.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 04:44 am
@ossobuco,
My pleasure.
0 Replies
 
xris
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 07:03 am
@Region Philbis,
Ive read them and still need to ask questions. From my recollections I received one or possibly two Emails, asking me if i would like to join a forum that included all the old members of the old philo forum? They appeared to be directed at me personally , not spams as been described. Not being able to converse with the so called guilty parties makes its very hard to obtain a balanced opinion. An opportunity to debate with all concerned might have avoided this us verses them silly exchange.
DrewDad
 
  5  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 07:06 am
@xris,
xris wrote:
They appeared to be directed at me personally , not spams as been described.

How would you know, if you can only see your own personal messages?

It appears to me that you're a narcissistic whiner, not a simple seeker-of-the-truth as you describe yourself.
xris
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 10:31 am
@DrewDad,
Being abusive is not helpful, is it? When you spam that many people as claimed, two thousand..is it reasonable to expect those spammed to be named? Not unless you have confidential information. So whats wrong with questioning those banned, is it too much to ask ? I know this forum is authoritarian but I can still whine as you so charmingly put it.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  0  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 10:43 am
@xris,
For over a month I've been trying to send private messages to two A2K members. They apparently don't receive them. What is the problem?

BBB
Robert Gentel
 
  3  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 11:14 am
@xris,
xris wrote:
I know the reasoning , I just oppose the action that has been taken. No communication , no argument., do debate..very philosophical.


What would you like to argue? So far I just see whining, no arguments. Should you develop one let me know.
Robert Gentel
 
  2  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 11:16 am
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
For over a month I've been trying to send private messages to two A2K members. They apparently don't receive them. What is the problem?


Your PMs are not affected by this. I am not sure what your issue is caused by but my personal suspicion is user error or a very very long PM (are you pasting something huge in there?)
0 Replies
 
xris
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 11:38 am
@Robert Gentel,
Argument , what you want is an argument ? I wondered why you bought Philo , what was your purpose? I wondered why you commentated on another poster in such a crude fashion. I think before long you will have to revoke another of your promises to never ban a member. You have not answered my questions or attempted to give satisfactory reasoning for this authoritarian response. Do you really believe that ownership gives you credibility or makes you right? All your going to end up with is bunch of scared toadies,willing to support your dictatorial views. The very things you admired about philo , you are gradually eroding..the very best of luck..
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Lola at the Coffee House - Question by Lola
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
Adding Tags to Threads - Discussion by Brandon9000
LOST & MISPLACED A2K people. - Discussion by msolga
Merry Andrew - Discussion by edgarblythe
Spot the April Fools gag yet? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Great New Look to A2K- Applause, Robert! - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Head count - Discussion by CalamityJane
New A2K feature requests. - Discussion by DrewDad
The great migration - Discussion by shewolfnm
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Email delay
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 08/04/2020 at 11:47:37