15
   

The thing I miss on A2K the most is SPELL CHECK

 
 
JTT
 
  2  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 04:05 pm
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
Wat brawser do you use, BBB? I thot that every brauser underlined spelling misteaks.

Every one of those errors, above, were underlined in read. [didn't catch the last one tho']
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 04:17 pm
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
Most of the egregious spelling errors that really bug me here won't be fixed that way, eg stuffing up "they're" and "their", "its" and "it's" etc.

Anyway, my browser has a spell check, though I am having to teach it to spell in English rather than American.
djjd62
 
  2  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 04:19 pm
@dlowan,
i've got grammar check as well, spelling underlines in red, grammar in green

helps with the it's and its
Robert Gentel
 
  2  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 04:40 pm
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Is it time to reinstall spell check? How many members would like to see that NOW?


Well it can't just happen now (we have a non-trivial amount of work on the short to do list), and it's probably not going to make it to the top of the priorities anytime soon. The reason is that browsers are increasingly performing this as natively and they can do it much better that way than a website can (the main reason is because the dictionary and much of the UI is local).

Chrome, Firefox and Safari users all have that natively, and there are good options like the Google Toolbar and other plugins for IE. Using those tools you'll have a faster, better spellcheck on all textareas on all sites and if you miss our old horrible spellcheck I recommend trying a browser-wide one, you'll probably like it a hell of a lot more (as an example of why, most of them are as-you-type while our old spellcheck was a popup that you'll run after you were finished).
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 05:12 pm
@djjd62,
djjd62 wrote:

i've got grammar check as well, spelling underlines in red, grammar in green

helps with the it's and its


You have a grammar check that helps with THAT?

What are you running again?
dyslexia
 
  2  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 05:16 pm
if your that werried abut speeling you probably got nothng to say anyho just just cut n paste, nobody reads nutting anyway.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 05:18 pm
@dlowan,
safari on snow leopard (mac)
OmSigDAVID
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 05:25 pm
@Reyn,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
INEVITABLE, especially with modern texting.
Reyn wrote:

Well, if you say so, but I don't believe, myself.
It may happen in "popular culture", but not be accepted in business.
A period of transition is inevitable.
Eventually, it will be universally accepted.
We need new fonetic dictionaries.
Fonetic spelling is effortless n flawless.
MOST of English is already fonetic; almost all of it.

The atavistic non-fonetic aspects of spelling r a defiance of logic
and thay r violence against efficiency. Teaching children the old way
is child abuse.





David wrote:
Change is irritating. I despise the metric system,
since I learned the English system, but I must admit
that most of the metric system is better
(excluding its temperature scale; Fahrenheit is better).
Reyn wrote:
Change may be irritating, but one can learn to adapt.
I thought I would never get used to metric (here in Canada),
but I'm getting better at it.
Adapt and ADOPT fonetic spelling; do it for the children.





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 05:28 pm
@Robert Gentel,
Robert, in my opinion, we don 't need a spelling checker,
but if u insist on it, I hope that u 'll give us a fonetic spelling checker.





David
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 05:30 pm
@djjd62,
Aaah...Mac.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 05:30 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
**** fonetic spelling

English is a dead language. No point in trying to 'fix' it.

Esperanto is the way to go. At least a world language would make sense.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 05:34 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:
**** fonetic spelling
Is that like a specialized sexual fetish ?

ehBeth wrote:
English is a dead language. No point in trying to 'fix' it.
That can be useful; stable, like Latin.





David
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 05:42 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

ehBeth wrote:
**** fonetic spelling
Is that like a specialized sexual fetish ?


actually you're not far off on how I perceive you and your obsessions
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 06:16 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Eventually, it will be universally accepted.

So, when you say universally, you are talking about every language on this planet?

You will find that all people will never agree on anything.
djjd62
 
  2  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 06:18 pm
@Reyn,
Reyn wrote:
You will find that all people will never agree on anything.


well i think we could all agree on that


wait, what Confused
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 06:19 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
actually you're not far off on how I perceive you and your obsessions


So in this case does that mean that a Silly Goose is necessarily a wackaloon or a hooplehead or both?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 06:22 pm
@dlowan,
Quote:
Most of the egregious spelling errors that really bug me here won't be fixed that way, eg stuffing up "they're" and "their", "its" and "it's" etc.


egregious, come on Deb, take a pill.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  -3  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 08:13 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:
**** fonetic spelling
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Is that like a specialized sexual fetish ?
ehBeth wrote:
actually you're not far off on how I perceive you and your obsessions
Well, I was obsessed with a girl named Joyce, descended of the Austrian Aristocracy,
for many decades, but my spelling was paradigmatic thru all those years.

Joyce rejected my attentions; maybe, if I had only tried to lure her with fonetic spelling. . . .





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 08:19 pm
@Reyn,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Eventually, it will be universally accepted.
Reyn wrote:

So, when you say universally, you are talking about every language on this planet?
Yeah, well since u bring it up: yeah.

I had been focusing on America, so far; that has been universal enuf, but since u bring it up. . . .





David
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 18 Jul, 2010 08:23 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
if I had only tried to lure her with fonetic spelling. . . .
Is that a line from "Tropic of Cancer" by Henry Miller?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Lola at the Coffee House - Question by Lola
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
Adding Tags to Threads - Discussion by Brandon9000
LOST & MISPLACED A2K people. - Discussion by msolga
Merry Andrew - Discussion by edgarblythe
Spot the April Fools gag yet? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Great New Look to A2K- Applause, Robert! - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Head count - Discussion by CalamityJane
New A2K feature requests. - Discussion by DrewDad
The great migration - Discussion by shewolfnm
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 04:59:14