@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:
contrex wrote:
If you reading a story in the Salt Lake City Globe, and the reporter is described as "The Globe's special reporter", you would not wonder if he might work for the Toronto Globe.
since the Toronto-based Globe and Mail is not referred to as the Globe, your comment here is meaningless
You appear to have completely missed my point. The newspaper title examples are hypothetical. They need not exist. When I invented them I had absolutely no idea whether either of those titles existed. Maybe if I had expressed myself thus you would have understood:
If you reading a story in the Manchester Bugle, and the reporter is described as "The Bugle's special reporter", you would not wonder if he might work for the Edinburgh Bugle.
Or even better,
Newspaper titles, are often composed of a geographical identifier, such as the name of a city, (Kansas City, Edinburgh, Birmingham) and a title, (Star, Evening News, Post). Very often, for reasons of brevity, the newspaper will refer to itself by the title alone, for example "by the Post's special reporter". Confusion is not anticipated because it is presumed that the reader will remember which newspaper he or she is reading. However, (fansy please note!) when quoting material abstracted from publications it may be necessary to take steps to avoid such confusion.
I might add that the correct full title of the newspaper published in London (UK) is "The Times".