@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:You really think neolithic man went riding on wooly rhinos or aurochs?
Doubt it. More likely mammoths. Point isn't that they definately did though - just that it's presumptive to rule it out.
Quote: That they may have experienced awe at seeing them--right before they plunged as many spears into them as possible, preperatory to butchering the remains--now that was a real gut-buster of an image.
So you esentially agree that it cannot be ruled out that they lost something - awe and hunting opportunities at the very least.
Quote: As for a lack of hunting, you apparently assumed that as the environment changed and the megafauna disappeared, no other creatures moved in to fill those niches.
No - all I assume is that it is presumptive of you to assume that only the megafauna themselves might have regarded their extinction as a destructive thing.
And you agree - because even you cede they may well have been a source of awe and prey for people such as the clovis.
So you agree that 'natural' is not antonymous to 'destructive', and you agree that primitive man may have had reasons to regard the passing of megafauna as destructive - for either subjective or objective reasons.
Good - we're making some progress.