0
   

the fact = ?

 
 
Reply Mon 12 Jul, 2010 07:14 am
'This is an antibody that evolved after the fact. That is part of the problem we have in dealing with HIV ?

I think the author refers "this" to " that one of them neutralised 91 per cent of HIV strains". But this antibody "gets ahead of the virus". No problem here, so why the author says "this is part of the problem"?

Context:
Now researchers have revealed three powerful antibodies have been discovered. Writing in the journal Science today, they said that one of them neutralised 91 per cent of HIV strains.
Study author Dr Gary Nabel of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,said: 'This is an antibody that evolved after the fact. That is part of the problem we have in dealing with HIV - once a person becomes infected, the virus always gets ahead of the immune system.
'What we are trying to do with a vaccine is get ahead of the virus.'
In the UK, there are 73,000 people living with HIV - the virus that progresses into AIDS - and experts believe that 30 per cent of people with HIV do not know they have the condition.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1293338/Super-antibodies-pave-way-effective-AIDS-vaccine.html#ixzz0tTP9cFOd
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 700 • Replies: 9
No top replies

 
PUNKEY
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Jul, 2010 07:17 am
after the fact = after someone has the disease
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Jul, 2010 08:26 pm
@PUNKEY,

Thanks.
Still I didn't get what the "that" meant in "That is part of the problem we have in dealing with HIV ".
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Jul, 2010 06:34 am
@oristarA,
The issue of the antibody having evolved after the fact is part of the problem they have in dealing with HIV.

oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Jul, 2010 07:29 am
@DrewDad,
Thanks.

Is "this antibody" is one of the " three powerful antibodies that have been discovered"? in the context "Now researchers have revealed three powerful antibodies have been discovered"? That is why I've got confused.
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Jul, 2010 07:43 am
@oristarA,
Yes. "Three antibodies"... "one of them neutralized 91 percent"... "This is an antibody that evolved after the fact."
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jul, 2010 10:12 pm
@DrewDad,
But the antibody is the part of the SOLUTION, not the part of the problem they have in dealing with HIV.

That is why I got confused.
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jul, 2010 07:16 am
@oristarA,
I suppose that he could be saying, "this is an antibody that continued to evolve after it was first created."
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jul, 2010 09:25 am
@DrewDad,
But this antibody occurred naturally, not was created by scientists.
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jul, 2010 09:43 am
@oristarA,
Correct.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » the fact = ?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 10:09:47