6
   

philosophy of science

 
 
GoshisDead
 
  0  
Reply Fri 16 Jul, 2010 11:46 pm
@kennethamy,
kennethamy wrote:

GoshisDead wrote:

kennethamy wrote:

GoshisDead wrote:

kennethamy wrote:

GoshisDead wrote:

kennethamy wrote:

GoshisDead wrote:

kennethamy wrote:

GoshisDead wrote:

kennethamy wrote:

GoshisDead wrote:

kennethamy wrote:

GoshisDead wrote:

kennethamy wrote:

wandeljw wrote:


I know what logicians mean by truth value, but what do you mean by it?There would be no value truth or otherwise because there would be no theory at all without interest, at this point I'm just seeing how many quotes within quotes I can goad him into.


I just told you what I meant by "truth-value". I mean what logicians mean by it, namely "the truth or falsity of a proposition, as the case may be". So why do you talk as if you don't have a clue as to what "truth-value" means? Of course, unless the theory exists, it would not have a truth value. Something must exist for it to have any properties and truth is a property. What has that to do with it?


Awesome I did it!


What a sad object you are. Who supports you?


And I did it again!


Yes, you made me pity you, and whoever it is who supports you.

This could go on for a while


Indeed it can, if you think that my pointing out how silly you are is something you goad me into doing. Do you know what the word "goad" means?

Okay I concede, you are much better at using the quote function than I


i don't know what "the quote function" is, but how about I can think better than you?

It is obvious that if you don't know what the quote function is that we have been using to make this fabulous nesting doll quote box, you not only cannot think better than I, you obviously have hard time thinking at all. Aren't insults fun.
0 Replies
 
ughaibu
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jul, 2010 04:21 am
This pair of idiots really need to figure out how to delete portions of quotes.
melonkali
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jul, 2010 05:45 am
@ughaibu,
ughaibu wrote:

This pair of idiots really need to figure out how to delete portions of quotes.


But can anything ever truly be "deleted"??

rebecca
ughaibu
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jul, 2010 05:53 am
@melonkali,
melonkali wrote:
ughaibu wrote:
This pair of idiots really need to figure out how to delete portions of quotes.
But can anything ever truly be "deleted"?
Nothing will "truly be deleted", because the record remains on the thread, and anyone interested in reading the entire story can find it, no problem. They dont need to be presented with it in post after post.
0 Replies
 
kennethamy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jul, 2010 06:25 am
@melonkali,
melonkali wrote:

ughaibu wrote:

This pair of idiots really need to figure out how to delete portions of quotes.


But can anything ever truly be "deleted"??

rebecca


The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.

The Rubaiyat of Omar Kyam

melonkali
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jul, 2010 06:49 am
@kennethamy,
kennethamy wrote:



But can anything ever truly be "deleted"??

rebecca

The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.

The Rubaiyat of Omar Kyam

[/quote]
[/quote]

Aye, Kenny, 'tis true, 'tis true. And it can seriously affect your life.

Did you ever have one of those public moments, in a serious situation, when something triggered a humorous memory and you could not keep from laughing so you had to make a quick emergency exit with tears in your eyes, holding your hand over your mouth, snorting?? Do you have to avoid publicly viewing or hearing certain "deep" movies, drama or music for this reason?? I do.

For example, if watching Zeffirelli's "Romeo and Juliet" around other people, I have to "be absent" during my favorite scene, the hauntingly beautiful song, "What is a youth?" Because of that silly movie, "My Cousin Vinny" -- the part when the attorney from Brooklyn (Joe Pesci) begins his argument (defending his young nephew and friend) with, "Deez two yoots..." and the judge (Fred Gwynne) in the "deep south" courtroom asks the Brooklyn attorney, "Whut is a yoot?" I can't mentally disconnect these two scenes.

I guess everyone has at least a few of "those" mental connections between certain things, which cause them to behave apparently "inappropriately" at times. Damn your eyes, Vinny!

rebecca
SammDickens
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jul, 2010 09:52 am
@melonkali,
It just goes to show you, mel...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=El2l__hRta0

Samm
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/18/2022 at 09:44:01