anti gay marriage ad

As you all say, who cares who marries who. Who cares that creeps who can't figure out how their parts work or that round doesn't work in square.

Actually it's not phobia that drives the anti-queer marrying crowd. Nor is it the love of marriage that drives the queers to want to get married.

It's money. The queers want the benefits that come with marriage. They add nothing to the gene pool nor society except for pornographic marches and a few diseases. But, they want the benefits. That's it and that's all.

You sad narrow minded little man. (Admin ban me if you want).

This is the same damaging homophobic nonsense idiots like you trawl around over and over again. That's right it doesnt matter who marries who. Man to Man women to women, man to women, as long you are happy and harm no-one in the process, what the hell has it got to do with you?

Against the bible is it? Funny how there are now gay people in the clergy.

Red-neck inbreads like yourself need to get out more and experience the richness of this planet. :no:

Sorry, you must've mis-understood. I don't give a hoot either. Let the nasties disease themselves into existence. I just don't see them as worthy of any benefits based on their personal preferences.

I just don't see them as worthy of any benefits based on their personal preferences.

And I view you the exact same way. Gonna settle for a "civil union" or are you saying that certain things are only for the "Right" kind of people?

Right kind of people? No. I don't believe in "benefits" for anybody. Other than what they are able to accumulate on their own through savings, investments, hard work or individual negotiation. Benefits require the government stealing from it's citizens for the sake of re-distribution. An act of evil. Stated as kindly as I can muster.

So you're against all forms of gov-recognized marriage?

My concern is not with marriage of any kind. My issue is the use of any reason to demand a benefit from the coffers that are stolen from the people.
All people should save from their own labors to ensure their own security. The act of getting married should not entitle anyone security provided by government. Especially based on a preference.

Then you'd be fine with gay marriage if there were no benefits as long as straight marriages had no benefits either?

My concern is not with marriage of any kind. My issue is the use of any reason to demand a benefit from the coffers that are stolen from the people.
All people should save from their own labors to ensure their own security. The act of getting married should not entitle anyone security provided by government. Especially based on a preference.

All benefits? even those who are injured working?

If a person at work, regardless of if they accept appendages into their rectum and/or their mouth or not , is hurt at work through no fault of their own, should be cared for by the company they work for or hopefully have prepared themselves for eventualities which can change their world. The government should play no part in these events.

Right kind of people? No. I don't believe in "benefits" for anybody. Other than what they are able to accumulate on their own through savings, investments, hard work or individual negotiation. Benefits require the government stealing from it's citizens for the sake of re-distribution. An act of evil. Stated as kindly as I can muster.

I don't see accepting tax benefits even if he's against tax benefits as being hypocritical. If he didn't accept them, he'd have less money and what would he have gained from it? Nothing. It wouldn't change anything. And I don't expect ppl to sacrifice their own self interests in futility.

I'm not opposing gay marriage or tax benefits or claiming that tax benefits are the reason ppl get married. And the way G-man negatively stereotypes gays to make them into a caricature makes it clear that he's a homophobe. All i'm saying is that if one opposes tax benefits in general, I still think it's ok to take them.

So what about their dependants under 16?