1
   

Lets attack China! (LOL)

 
 
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Dec, 2007 09:04 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;48004 wrote:
Within ten years we'll be at war with China, anyway, over oil. Why not get the jump on them now?:dunno:


oh, so you're phychic now too?

because it's always good to nuke nations based on predictions from a magic 8-ball :thumbup:
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Dec, 2007 09:06 pm
@rugonnacry,
rugonnacry;48012 wrote:
Delete this post and try again... You are asking me to prove things that I one DOnt care about and two NEVER mentioned.


it matters not what you care about, these are important questions when determining china's ability to nuke other nations!
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Dec, 2007 07:41 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;48035 wrote:
oh, so you're phychic now too?

because it's always good to nuke nations based on predictions from a magic 8-ball :thumbup:


We should always be screwing with our enemies and potential enemies. Always. :yup:Laughing:giterdone:Laughing:yup:
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Dec, 2007 07:45 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;48145 wrote:
We should always be screwing with our enemies and potential enemies. Always. :yup:Laughing:giterdone:Laughing:yup:


^
|


Read the above post if you're confused as to why the world hates America!
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Dec, 2007 07:47 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;48148 wrote:
^
|


Read the above post if you're confused as to why the world hates America!


Read the above to understand how Hillary Skagbag/Hocake Clinton for US Prez is possible.:thumbsdown:
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Dec, 2007 07:52 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;48150 wrote:
Read the above to understand how Hillary Skagbag/Hocake Clinton for US Prez is possible.:thumbsdown:


:wtf:

Just to let you know not everybody who disagrees with you likes hillary! So try to stop making generalizations, I know it's hard for you, but you can do it!
0 Replies
 
rugonnacry
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 11:58 am
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;48036 wrote:
it matters not what you care about, these are important questions when determining china's ability to nuke other nations!


You are asking for proof of something I do not believe to be the case...


1.)Prove China Has the Most advanced Nuclear Capabilities

I do not believe they do have such a thing as the most advanced, so where do you suggest I go to prove something I don't believe exists.

Its like asking an Atheist to prove there IS a god.
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 12:00 pm
@Adam Bing,
Wow...a serious post from RU---. Good points.
0 Replies
 
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 12:08 pm
@rugonnacry,
rugonnacry;48180 wrote:
You are asking for proof of something I do not believe to be the case...


1.)Prove China Has the Most advanced Nuclear Capabilities

I do not believe they do have such a thing as the most advanced, so where do you suggest I go to prove something I do believe exists.

Its like asking an Atheist to prove there IS a god.


Well you believe what you want,i certainly think china has the nuclear capabilities,india and pakistan both have them and china had them along time beofre these 2 couintry's,so i think they will have progressed since then.
0 Replies
 
rugonnacry
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 12:11 pm
@Adam Bing,
Our government wants us to be so scared to death of attack from other countries, that the fact we have not been told china has flown over us with nuclear bombs already, is a great persuader in believing they are FAR from being able to launch a nuke past there own borders.
0 Replies
 
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 12:52 pm
@rugonnacry,
rugonnacry;48180 wrote:
You are asking for proof of something I do not believe to be the case...


1.)Prove China Has the Most advanced Nuclear Capabilities

I do not believe they do have such a thing as the most advanced, so where do you suggest I go to prove something I don't believe exists.

Its like asking an Atheist to prove there IS a god.


well, you said with TODAY'S nukes, their planes would've been blown out of the sky....well if you're saying that china doesn't have TODAY'S nukes then it really doesn't matter, now does it?
0 Replies
 
rugonnacry
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 01:21 pm
@Adam Bing,
NO... I said with todays technology... The Enola Gay would have been blown out of the sky.


If I say 1+1 =2 you cannot come back later and say I said 1+1 = 3
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 02:31 pm
@rugonnacry,
rugonnacry;48210 wrote:
NO... I said with todays technology... The Enola Gay would have been blown out of the sky.


If I say 1+1 =2 you cannot come back later and say I said 1+1 = 3


well it doesn't matter what would've happened to the "enola que" because

A) China doesn't have the "enola que"

and

B) According to you China doesn't have Today's technology
0 Replies
 
rugonnacry
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 04:58 pm
@Adam Bing,
You made reference that we dropped a nuke with just a B52 (enola gay) I responded with a plane cannot just haul a nuke across the ocean anymore.
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 09:17 pm
@rugonnacry,
rugonnacry;48223 wrote:
You made reference that we dropped a nuke with just a B52 (enola gay) I responded with a plane cannot just haul a nuke across the ocean anymore.


and why is that?
Drakej
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 10:20 pm
@Adam Bing,
Yeah I am more or less confused as well. What has changed between now and WWII?
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 07:26 am
@Drakej,
Drakej;48272 wrote:
Yeah I am more or less confused as well. What has changed between now and WWII?


62 years
0 Replies
 
rugonnacry
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 10:04 am
@Adam Bing,
Technology.... Infra scanners to register NUCLEAR products...
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 06:27 pm
@rugonnacry,
rugonnacry;48304 wrote:
Technology.... Infra scanners to register NUCLEAR products...


you didn't answer my question!
0 Replies
 
Drakej
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 06:55 pm
@Adam Bing,
Well okay, but why cant they transport a nuke in a B-52? Regardless of them being discovered or not they can still drop a nuke with a B-52 correct?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/12/2025 at 04:22:57