Reply
Thu 28 Jun, 2007 01:11 am
So without giving all my arguments up front I believe that Russia has an equal maybe a slightly more powerful military than the US. A lot goes into this including committments and the ability to conscript or to mobilise industry to fight war. The US has a lot of high tech gadgets (nothing the Russians haven't duplicated or made better) but this high level of technology is expensive and slow to produce and is the primary disadvantage the US has against Russian conventional might.
Furthermore, the Russians have developed great counter measures to US offensive weapons while the US has not focused significantly on defensive weapons. This leaves the US open to counter attacks while Russians can shoot down cruise missiles, stealth aircraft, destroy US Aircraft Carriers and etc.
My favorite example of just how much better the Russian tech is in practicality and use is the Russian's new version of a flame thrower which fires like a bazooka and acts like a fuel air bomb.
The bazooka (smaller than a US anti-tank missile or Stinger Missile) is shoulder launched and can destroy a bunker the size of a 2 car garage (blowing it to pieces).
While this is not beyond the capacties of most developed nations simply most developed nations do not manufacture such weapons. This weapon if distributed to the majority of infantry troops puts the Russians at a great advantage to current US methods of war (which usually consists of elements or squads remaining mobile by being attached to a transport).
Of course dynamics happens in strategy and the mobile forces of today isn't necessarily the method of mobility chosen for more line combat involving fronts.
But anyway...let the debate begin?
@The Last Cathedral,
We both still have the capacity to destroy the world many times over.
@The Last Cathedral,
yup
many many times over
in a conventional war I would have to the the USA would take the cake because
1. We have the money/food to fight it
2. Missle defense
3. F22>the new MIG
@The Last Cathedral,
Just read an extensive article in "The Economist" on the conduct and outcomes of Russia's war in Chechnya. Good read. I've read other sources about Russian military operations in the Transcaucasus region. What a horrible, horrible mess. No, Russia is in a state of semi-anarchy and is just barely surviving as a viable nation. It'll stay well behind for a long, long time. It's a screwed up place, bad.
@The Last Cathedral,
The F22 is run more by a computer than man. The new MiG is not thus I agree F22>MiG
@The Last Cathedral,
The Russians could have all the best stuff right now, and they
still wouldn't be able to match us on the battlefield. Too disorganized and corrupt.
@The Last Cathedral,
russian corruption has us licked in the organization factor. (Military Wise) The only reason we would win in a stand up brawl is we have money, they do not.