Tue 3 Jul, 2007 06:51 pm - [QUOTE=rugonnacry;24520]Right here slick...
Main article: History of the Supreme Court of the United States
The history of the Supreme Court is frequently described in terms of the Chief... (view)
Sun 1 Jul, 2007 03:19 pm - [QUOTE=Pinochet73;24493]Hey, Washington was an [I]incredible[/I] guy -- a great general, patriot and first president. Nah....Washington was awesome. :headbang:[/QUOTE]
You should read... (view)
Sun 1 Jul, 2007 03:17 pm - [QUOTE=Volunteer;24475]I just have one thing to say to promoting one region of the country over another, "United States of America."
What was the line in Jesus Christ Superstar? Why... (view)
Sun 1 Jul, 2007 03:13 pm - [QUOTE=Reagaknight;24485]Well, I like Washington a bit more than Jefferson, he did quite as much for America, and he said this:
"Where is the security for property, for reputation, for... (view)
Sun 1 Jul, 2007 03:11 pm - [QUOTE=rugonnacry;24484]Where is your debate? Cam and I have both given you examples where the SUPREME COURT has defined seperation of church and statee, all you have done is give examples of why... (view)
Sat 30 Jun, 2007 09:47 pm - So you won't intelligently debate the fact the US Constitution has not been amended by the courts have invented a philosophy based on nothing? No one in the entire history of the USA has used... (view)
Sat 30 Jun, 2007 09:23 pm - It's not even up for debate Silverchild I do believe that to everyone it is quite obvious I'm right. The Supreme Court "invented" laws that never existed. Historically the... (view)
Fri 29 Jun, 2007 06:50 pm - [QUOTE=rugonnacry;24353]You have already lost my friend. When your first response to me was an insult you lost all credibility to your argument.
I forsee you lasting long in this... (view)
Fri 29 Jun, 2007 06:50 pm - OK I found in entirety the SCOTUS determination in 1878 and the great irony is in my favor.
The argument in context is that the US has no ability to legislate what a man may or may not do by... (view)
Fri 29 Jun, 2007 06:39 pm - You're a fool. The 1878 case is simply a ruling on marriage. It uses the phrase "Separation of Church and State" but in no way does it dictate that the Church and State are... (view)
