Latest Gay Republican Sex Scandal: Giuliani Aide Arrested for Extortion

Then why are you posting articles of gay repugs and not gay democraps? Or are you gonna claim your not partisan?

Classic case of double standard. You think Craig should be out but it was fine for them to just sensor Frank, i was born at night but not last night. You ridicule two supposedly outed gay repugs but you defend the gay democrat, very telling, LOL.

Ok, let me see if I can come down to your level, and help you to understand....
I am posting articles about gay or alleged gay Republicans, to further illustrate the hypocrisy displayed by Republicans, in general, that they hold the moral 'high ground" , and that they never do anything wrong, and are not guilty of any or all wrong doing.
Are there gay Democrats? Of course. Are some in "high profile positions"? Of course. Have some been caught doing wrong. Of course. Have some been caught doing wrong, recently? Well, not so recently. Remember, we're talking about "high profile cases"....Oh, well, I guess not....
What about the Republicans...oh well, let's see there's Foley, U.S. Representative
The Crime: Sending sexually laced, gramatically challenged instant messages and e-mails to teenaged boys in the Congressional page program for more than 10 years.

The Hypocrisy: Chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children. One of the foremost opponents of child pornography in the Senate.

The Quote: ?get a ruler and measure it for me?

...oh that was so long ago..and forgotten (well, it wasn't so long ago, that it impacted the mid-term elections, which turned the tide in favor of Democrats) Aaron stop! You're not playing fair!

Then there was Ted Haggard, Leader of the National Association of Evangelicals...who seemingly had a mea culpa..

The Crime: Paying male prostitutes for sex and snorting crystal meth.

The Hypocrisy: A powerful force in the evangelical movement, Haggard participated in weekly meetings with President George Bush and top advisors where he gave spiritual advice. He taught that homosexuality was an abomination and actively lobbied against gay rights.

The Quote: ?I did not have a homosexual relationship with a man in Denver.?

Aaron quit! That doesn't even count.

Then there was Bob Allen, member of the Florida House of Representatives
Florida Chairman of John McCain?s Presidential Campaign

The Crime: Offering an undercover cop $20 to allow Allen to blow him in a men?s room in a public park. After being arrested, Allen tried to explain that he only offered to blow the cop because the cop was a ?burly black man? and he ?didn?t want to become a statistic.?

The Hypocrisy: Allen was one of 21 Florida legislators to sign Gov. Jeb Bush?s friend-of-the-court brief supporting the state?s ban on gays adopting children, and he co-sponsored an unsuccessful bill that would have enhanced penalties for ?offenses involving unnatural and lascivious acts? such as indecent exposure.

The Quote: ?I certainly wasn?t there to have sex with anybody and certainly wasn?t there to exchange money for it.?

Then there was Craig, U.S. Senator
Senate Liason for Mitt Romney?s Presidential Campaign

The Crime: Soliciting sex from an undercover cop in an airport bathroom

The Hypocrisy: Craig twice voted against adding the words ?sexual orientation? to the federal hate crimes law. Craig also voted to give states the right to refuse to recognize gay marriage?a right they already had, but the Senator wanted to really, really prove he didn?t like gay people.

The Quote: ?I am not gay, I don?t do these kinds of things.?
.....Aaron stop! You're just taking advantage of a bad situation...Craig was railroaded...and he just may come out of this unscathed.
Bad Aaron!

See links: Republicans Involved in Sex Scandals as Much as Democrats: From Garfield to Harding to Eisenhower to Reagan to Bush to Giuliani to Schwarzenegger

and top five republican gay sex scandals ? Badmouth

So just to recap. How many democraps did you mention by name in your new post? Your bias slip is showing again.

Are you dumb or just playing dumb? It's "censor"!
And there's no double standard...if a gay Democrat were to step in doo doo, I'd be the first one to throw an egg.
For Godssake, Barney Frank was censored...publicly embarassed, but the Senate chose not to oust him...not me, the Senate chose...if you have a problem with that, take it up with the Congress, which at the time, was a Republican majority...but it wasn't serious enough for his ouster...ok???? And he was never convicted of a crime, unlike Craig. Geez. Take a remedial course in English and government....'cuz, every thing seems to go over your head....

But mind you, this still doesn't explain why your picking on homo's?

Even though you're allegedly "straight" (although the jury is still out), can you not be objective and condemn a straight child molester, male, who abused a young girl....or do you have to be gay, to have such sensibilities?
Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it. Double geez.
The fact that you can't comprehend much, is not my problem...ask your more intelligent buddies, like Pino and SoCal, I'm through trying to school the "unschoolable"

That's because the unschoolable schooled you long ago.

Uh, try explaining what you just wrote...you won't, because you're incapable...you don't know what you write...the hallmarks of a fool.
I'm through. Really.

I saw you coming long ago, your the tolerant openminded kind of guy. So i thought, i was wrong. Guess how many times i've seen you post that? Hint, it's over four.

And guess what, everybody? He still didn't explain his post. If I were asked to explain a post of mine, I could offer up some kind of explanation....so, what you do? Divert and deflect. That says it all....the prosecution rest.

You asked me to explain this.
This was my responce:"I saw you coming long ago, your the tolerant openminded kind of guy. So i thought, i was wrong." You said i was unschoolable, that and me seeing you coming allowed me to school yuo, get it? If you don't i guess you'll have to study longer.

ROTFLMAO

You intellects give me goose mumps.

Nonsensical...yet, again.

Yeah, it was ment that way, seems to confuse you intellects, LOL.

The word is "meant"...and you "meant"..."intellectuals".....intellect is synonymous with "smarts"...a dept. in which you seem to be lacking, obviously.

Smarts or smart, boy you intellects are good, LOL. So intellects would make "smarts's"