Latest Gay Republican Sex Scandal: Giuliani Aide Arrested for Extortion

@aaronssongs,

aaronssongs;35047 wrote:

Absolutely not....Sexual orientation doesn't have a thing to do with morality, or one being a criminal or not.

Then why are you posting articles of gay repugs and not gay democraps? Or are you gonna claim your not partisan?

@aaronssongs,

aaronssongs;35051 wrote:

Barney Frank was censored (i.e. paid a price) for his indiscretion. However, his constituency saw fitting to re-elect him as their congressman. Much like Giuliani and Newt Gingrich admitting to their indiscretions...folks f... up, unlike you. LOL

Classic case of double standard. You think Craig should be out but it was fine for them to just sensor Frank, i was born at night but not last night. You ridicule two supposedly outed gay repugs but you defend the gay democrat, very telling, LOL.

1 Reply

@Drnaline,

Drnaline;35192 wrote:

Then why are you posting articles of gay repugs and not gay democraps? Or are you gonna claim your not partisan?

Ok, let me see if I can come down to your level, and help you to understand....
I am posting articles about gay or alleged gay Republicans, to further illustrate the hypocrisy displayed by Republicans, in general, that they hold the moral 'high ground" , and that they never do anything wrong, and are not guilty of any or all wrong doing.
Are there gay Democrats? Of course. Are some in "high profile positions"? Of course. Have some been caught doing wrong. Of course. Have some been caught doing wrong, recently? Well, not so recently. Remember, we're talking about "high profile cases"....Oh, well, I guess not....
What about the Republicans...oh well, let's see there's...oh that was so long ago..and forgotten (well, it wasn't so long ago, that it impacted the mid-term elections, which turned the tide in favor of Democrats) Aaron stop! You're not playing fair!

Then there was Ted Haggard, Leader of the National Association of Evangelicals...who seemingly had a mea culpa..

Aaron quit! That doesn't even count.

Then there wasThen there was....Aaron stop! You're just taking advantage of a bad situation...Craig was railroaded...and he just may come out of this unscathed.
Bad Aaron!

See links: Republicans Involved in Sex Scandals as Much as Democrats: From Garfield to Harding to Eisenhower to Reagan to Bush to Giuliani to Schwarzenegger

and

0 Replies

@aaronssongs,

So just to recap. How many democraps did you mention by name in your new post? Your bias slip is showing again.

0 Replies

@Drnaline,

Drnaline;35194 wrote:

Classic case of double standard. You think Craig should be out but it was fine for them to just sensor Frank, i was born at night but not last night. You ridicule two supposedly outed gay repugs but you defend the gay democrat, very telling, LOL.

Are you dumb or just playing dumb? It's "censor"!
And there's no double standard...if a gay Democrat were to step in doo doo, I'd be the first one to throw an egg.
For Godssake, Barney Frank was censored...publicly embarassed, but the Senate chose not to oust him...not me, the Senate chose...if you have a problem with that, take it up with the Congress, which at the time, was a Republican majority...but it wasn't serious enough for his ouster...ok???? And he was never convicted of a crime, unlike Craig. Geez. Take a remedial course in English and government....'cuz, every thing seems to go over your head....

0 Replies

@aaronssongs,

But mind you, this still doesn't explain why your picking on homo's?

1 Reply

@Drnaline,

Drnaline;35206 wrote:

But mind you, this still doesn't explain why your picking on homo's?

Even though you're allegedly "straight" (although the jury is still out), can you not be objective and condemn a straight child molester, male, who abused a young girl....or do you have to be gay, to have such sensibilities?
Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it. Double geez.
The fact that you can't comprehend much, is not my problem...ask your more intelligent buddies, like Pino and SoCal, I'm through trying to school the "unschoolable"

0 Replies

@aaronssongs,

That's because the unschoolable schooled you long ago.

1 Reply

@Drnaline,

Drnaline;35209 wrote:

That's because the unschoolable schooled you long ago.

Uh, try explaining what you just wrote...you won't, because you're incapable...you don't know what you write...the hallmarks of a fool.
I'm through. Really.

1 Reply

@aaronssongs,

aaronssongs;35210 wrote:

Uh, try explaining what you just wrote...you won't, because you're incapable...you don't know what you write...the hallmarks of a fool.
I'm through. Really.

Quote:

Uh, try explaining what you just wrote...you won't, because you're incapable...

I saw you coming long ago, your the tolerant openminded kind of guy. So i thought, i was wrong.

Quote:

I'm through. Really

Guess how many times i've seen you post that? Hint, it's over four.

1 Reply

@Drnaline,

Drnaline;35213 wrote:

I saw you coming long ago, your the tolerant openminded kind of guy. So i thought, i was wrong. Guess how many times i've seen you post that? Hint, it's over four.

And guess what, everybody? He still didn't explain his post. If I were asked to explain a post of mine, I could offer up some kind of explanation....so, what you do? Divert and deflect. That says it all....the prosecution rest.

0 Replies

@aaronssongs,

Quote:

That's because the unschoolable schooled you long ago.

You asked me to explain this.
This was my responce:"I saw you coming long ago, your the tolerant openminded kind of guy. So i thought, i was wrong." You said i was unschoolable, that and me seeing you coming allowed me to school yuo, get it? If you don't i guess you'll have to study longer.

1 Reply

@Drnaline,

Drnaline;35347 wrote:

You asked me to explain this.
This was my responce:"I saw you coming long ago, your the tolerant openminded kind of guy. So i thought, i was wrong." You said i was unschoolable, that and me seeing you coming allowed me to school yuo, get it? If you don't i guess you'll have to study longer.

ROTFLMAO

0 Replies

@aaronssongs,

You intellects give me goose mumps.

1 Reply

@Drnaline,

Drnaline;36270 wrote:

You intellects give me goose mumps.

Nonsensical...yet, again.

0 Replies

@aaronssongs,

Yeah, it was ment that way, seems to confuse you intellects, LOL.

1 Reply

@Drnaline,

Drnaline;36391 wrote:

Yeah, it was ment that way, seems to confuse you intellects, LOL.

The word is "meant"...and you "meant"..."intellectuals".....intellect is synonymous with "smarts"...a dept. in which you seem to be lacking, obviously.

0 Replies

@aaronssongs,

Smarts or smart, boy you intellects are good, LOL. So intellects would make "smarts's"

0 Replies

Latest Gay Republican Sex Scandal: Giuliani Aide Arrested for Extortion

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know