@One Man Clan,
The problem in accepting the construction Jefferson gives in his
Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank, 1791, is that it would cause a loss in the individual the right to bear arms. The Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union were not revoked, except where specifically over~rided by the Constitution.
'...But every State shall always keep up a well-regulated and disciplined militia, sufficiently armed and accoutered, and shall provide and constantly have ready for use, in public stores, a due number of filed pieces and tents, and a proper quantity of arms, ammunition and camp equipage.'
'A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.'
At the least, one would have to admit to gun control.
However, following the logic of Jefferson, the right to bear arms is dependent on being in the militia.
If one wishes to use the argument to delete other powers, one would have to accept this other loss. As well as the loss of power of the police to arrest people on federal drug charges.
The founders also saw taxes to be placed on wealth, increasing with the amount of wealth. The present exceptions to property tax would be illegal.
The Federal Bank would also be illegal and the control that advantages business men would be lost.
So, one has to decide if one can accept all the variations and cannot be selective.