0
   

Try, try again, by Ann Coulter

 
 
Red cv
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Aug, 2007 06:11 pm
@socalgolfguy,
LOL Socal.
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Aug, 2007 10:55 am
@socalgolfguy,
socalgolfguy;31307 wrote:
For your consideration,

If at First You Don?t Succeed, Lie, Lie Again
by Ann Coulter
Posted: 08/15/2007

Suspiciously, Daniel Pearl's widow is suddenly being lavishly praised by the Treason Lobby. Jane Mayer, co-author of the discredited hit-book on Clarence Thomas, "Strange Justice," published an article in The New Yorker last week recounting that Mariane Pearl was called by Alberto Gonzales in March with the news that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed had admitted to American interrogators that he had personally beheaded her husband and they were going to release the transcript to the press. Mayer wrote: "Gonzales' announcement seemed like a publicity stunt."

Frank Rich followed up with an article in The New York Times saying of Gonzales' call: "Ms. Pearl recognized a publicity ploy when she saw it."

Inasmuch as these are journalists who adjudge George Bush more evil than Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, their perception of reality is to be treated gingerly. But if Ms. Pearl is toying with the idea of becoming the latest liberal cause celebre, she might want to consider the trajectories of the rest of them.


All the Democrats' most dearly beloved anti-war/anti-Bush heroes invariably end up in the Teresa Heinz Kerry wing of the nut-house. Scott Ritter went from being a trusted U.N. weapons inspector valiantly defending poor, misunderstood Saddam Hussein from George Bush's imperialistic war to being just another creep trying to have sex with underage girls.

Cindy Sheehan once had "absolute moral authority." Now she's just a madwoman writing mash notes to Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez.

Max Cleland was a war hero who lost his limbs as a result of Viet Cong grenades, giving him the stature to gleefully taunt George Bush and Dick Cheney. "Where the hell were you in the Vietnam War?" Cleland responded to Cheney. "If you had gone to Vietnam like the rest of us, maybe you would have learned something about war."

Then we learned Cleland was a victim only of his own clumsiness and had dropped the grenade on himself in Vietnam after stopping for a beer.

Bill Burkett was the left's most admired military veteran since Benedict Arnold. He claimed Bush had shirked his National Guard duty and said he had the documents to prove it. According to Dan Rather and CBS News, Burkett was a "solid" and "unimpeachable" source who was being attacked by "partisan political operatives."

And then Burkett turned out to be a foaming-at-the-mouth loon. He was eventually forced to admit on air that he had "misled" CBS on the phony National Guard documents, which is a little like Hugo Chavez "misleading" Sean Penn. Burkett's current medical diagnosis: too crazy to be a homeless person.

The congressional campaign of anti-war Iraq war veteran Paul Hackett was treated in the media as if it were the Second Coming. The New York Times described Hackett adoringly as a "lean 6-foot-4, he is garrulous, profane and quick with a barbed retort or a mischievous joke." The Times even produced the obligatory quote-ready Republican who said that "Mr. Hackett's service had caused him to consider voting Democratic."

Then we found out with a little more specificity what some of those quick-witted barbs were. Hackett called the president a "chickenhawk," referred to Bush's "Bring it on" statement as "the most incredibly stupid comment," and called Bush "the biggest threat in America." Yes, he was a veritable Noel Coward, that Hackett.

Soon, even Rep. Rahm Emanuel and Sen. Chuck Schumer were trying to get Hackett to drop his next political campaign for the U.S. Senate.

Gen. Wesley Clark was once compared to Eisenhower, which, in mediaspeak, means: "He is virulently anti-Bush." Democrats were so tickled to have found an anti-war Southerner and retired general, New York Times columnist Bob Herbert asked, is he "just a mirage?"

Then it turned out the only war Clark wanted to lead was America's War on Fetuses, declaring that abortion should be legal for any reason until the moment of birth. Soon Clark was buddying around with Michael Moore and Madonna. Also, he claimed he had received calls from "the White House" by which he meant "a think tank in Canada."

Last we heard, Gen. Clark was on the alternate list for "Dancing With the Stars."

Joe Wilson went from being billed in the media as a trusted adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney and billed (by himself) as an eyewitness to the president's "lies," to being an apron-wearing househusband who had been sent on an errand by his wife.

Not only did he fail to debunk the Niger yellowcake story, he also forgot to bring home the quart of milk his wife had requested. (Wilson is now demanding a congressional investigation into who leaked the classified information that his wife wears the pants in the family.)

The Joe Wilson celebrity tour officially ended when The Washington Post editorialized: "It's unfortunate that so many people took (Wilson) seriously" -- not the least of whom were reporters at The Washington Post itself.

Most recently, The New Republic's "Baghdad Diarist" has been unveiled as a liar, another illustrious chapter in that magazine's storied history of publishing con men and frauds.

If conservatives are the ones driven by ideological passions, then why are liberals the ones always falling for laughable hoaxes in support of their anti-war ideological agenda? And if liberal beliefs are true, why do they need all the phony stunts to prove them? How about liberals keep hoaxes out of politics and return them to their rightful place: "proving" Darwinian evolution.

Ann Coulter is Legal Affairs Correspondent for HUMAN EVENTS and author of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors," "Slander," ""How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must)," and most recently, "Godless."




Listen at you....you all sound like degenerates lusting after pictures of women in lingerie in a Sears catalogue...running your fingers over the images...sad, and pathetic.

Ms. Coulter's accounting of Jane Mayer, and her accurate assessment of Gonzales only shows how petty and bitter she is to discredit the obvious, Gonzales' grandstanding, with him under a cloud of suspicion and contempt...I'd say anything to take the heat off of me, too. Anything.
She seems, heartless bitch that she is, to go after the grievously injured, if not the widows of 9/11, then Marianne Pearl....who's next?
Scott Ritter? I'm not familiar with him, but I'm sure her tar and feathering of him is just pure spin and propaganda....you know any liberal with her, is a viable target, and fair game.
Cindy Sheehan, who really scares her, is alledgedly seeking Nancy Pelosi's seat , to get done, what she seems reluctant to do....impeachment of both the president and the vice president, and restoration of the Bill of Rights and the efficacy of the Constitution of the United States of America.
More spin and propaganda about war hero Max Cleland.
Clearly this op-ed by Ms. Coulter, is pure right wing propaganda and spin, the only thing she is good at...and being a pin up girl for wing wangs that want to stare at her, while polishing their knobs. She is one ugly bimbo. With only one outfit...a black after 5 cocktail dress that she wears everywhere, and at any time.....looking like she just pulled up from being a sex pinata, the night before, and couldn't make it home to change for the interview....yeah, she's some babe, alright! LOL
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Aug, 2007 12:10 pm
@socalgolfguy,
To bad you can't suppress her huh?
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Aug, 2007 12:59 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;32774 wrote:
To bad you can't suppress her huh?


i dont want her suppressed lol i want her to stand for election,then we will see how well she does,she wont get away with the crap she spouts.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Aug, 2007 03:04 pm
@socalgolfguy,
Quote:
she wont get away with the crap she spouts.
She gets away with it now, who's gunna do anything different then what you've already tried?
0 Replies
 
Red cv
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Aug, 2007 04:01 pm
@socalgolfguy,
I admire anyone who has the guts to speak their minds, I'm so sick of political speakeez. An honest opinion wins hands down to some water down tripe, gag me with a spoon.
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Aug, 2007 04:41 pm
@Red cv,
Red;32799 wrote:
I admire anyone who has the guts to speak their minds, I'm so sick of political speakeez. An honest opinion wins hands down to some water down tripe, gag me with a spoon.


I admire anyone who has the guts to speak their mind....unfortunately, a whole lot of people are running around speaking their minds, except they don't exhibit any remnants of a mind, to begin with....Ann Coulter is one of those....otherwise she wouldn't be the brunt of so many jokes and pundits. Truth doesn't need for you to believe it, to be true...it is, without belief. Ann Coulter doesn't speak truth...she speaks hyperbole, propaganda, spin, and lies "as truth". Big difference. She is a hater, and a backbiter...she , obviously, has self-esteem issues, and she's obviously "frigid", or a closet lesbian.....you have never seen her on the arm of man, or on a date....who would date her, except some pervert, who can't find a child to molest. And that as a last resort. Just look at her. Geez.
0 Replies
 
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Aug, 2007 05:05 pm
@Red cv,
Red;32799 wrote:
I admire anyone who has the guts to speak their minds, I'm so sick of political speakeez. An honest opinion wins hands down to some water down tripe, gag me with a spoon.


you sound a lot like her lol england has sharia law lol hilter was a socialist lol
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Aug, 2007 11:59 pm
@scooby-doo cv,
scooby-doo;32809 wrote:
you sound a lot like her lol england has sharia law lol hilter was a socialist lol


What are you smokin" Scoob? Your post had really nothing to do with Red's comment....? :dunno:
0 Replies
 
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 08:53 am
@scooby-doo cv,
scooby-doo;32809 wrote:
you sound a lot like her lol england has sharia law lol hilter was a socialist lol


it was in referance to her stupid post on another thread !
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 11:32 am
@scooby-doo cv,
scooby-doo;33023 wrote:
it was in referance to her stupid post on another thread !


Oh, I thought you were paying attention - guess I was wrong....
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 11:37 am
@socalgolfguy,
socalgolfguy;33066 wrote:
Oh, I thought you were paying attention - guess I was wrong....


i think red,is the forum's ann coulter :lightbulb: going by some of her post's
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 12:33 pm
@scooby-doo cv,
scooby-doo;33067 wrote:
i think red,is the forum's ann coulter :lightbulb: going by some of her post's


Being that we are both at least part Scot, don't you prefer redheads over blondes like I do?
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 01:03 pm
@socalgolfguy,
socalgolfguy;33080 wrote:
Being that we are both at least part Scot, don't you prefer redheads over blondes like I do?


Typical how a discussion of Ann Coulter deteriorates into a discussion of sex, lust and misogyny. Or is it that you're preoccupied with it, Socalgolfguy?....you talk about sex and getting with various members of the forum, frequently....what's the matter, no prospective dates where you are?
Do you have an addiction you'd like to elaborate on? Or perhaps not.
Contrary to your belief, women are not sexual playthings that you wear like plaid shorts (madras, no doubt)...hence redheads one day, but when pressed will settle for a blond....and as if that had anything to do with being a certain nationality. Telling....very telling.
0 Replies
 
scooby-doo cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 01:48 pm
@socalgolfguy,
socalgolfguy;33080 wrote:
Being that we are both at least part Scot, don't you prefer redheads over blondes like I do?


i actually prefer brunettes lol but then again,i see back,hispanic,asian,redheads/blondes that i also like,so its hard to make a choice Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 04:13 pm
@socalgolfguy,
The family i married into are red heads, damn.
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 04:20 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;33142 wrote:
The family i married into are red heads, damn.


Damn lucky, I say. Right, Red?
0 Replies
 
wvpeach
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 06:53 pm
@Red cv,
Ann Coulter makes money by spewing nasty gibberish.

Kinda like Howard Stern in my book, she's almost as nasty.

She certainly tops Rush for being foul mouthed and idiotic.
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 06:58 pm
@socalgolfguy,
Hey, wvpeach - welcome - you should go to the "Introduce Yourself" forum and announce your arrival.
0 Replies
 
Red cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Aug, 2007 07:07 pm
@socalgolfguy,
LOL what's amatter Scooby haven't got the guts to go over to the Scotland thread and rebuttal me on Scotland. Funny you come into an American forum but lack the guts or the where with all to face up to what your cowardly goverment is doing, oh make that not doing visa vie Muslim Gangs. Bring it on Scooby but I'm not a Con I'm a classical liberal. I like gays, I like social programs and yes get this I shave my legs. Anne is a bitter woman who needs to eat more. Howard Stern is an asshole and Norm is a bloody communist idiot and bitter to boot. I'd rather worship a rat than stand and worship any of the above.

Redheads are admired all over the globe, why do so many women dye their hair my color? Want to piss me off say Multicultural in a sentence, forcing people of different races and religion into gettos or religious enclaves to get the vote like the left does is beyond dispicable it should be illegal. Have the left no shame or a conscience? NO they'd hoe themselves to the devil to get elected. When the poor wake up and realise it's not the cons who kept them down it's the left for the vote watch the rage erupt in the streets. We the cons (well not me) have paid to aide the poor and new immigrants the left just want their vote for as many generations as they can suck out of them. If the poor want change vote Dem, if you want a life time of poverty and a nanny nation and pervs running your country vote Rep. Then again the cons are cons in Canada and the liberals are commies and the NDP are freaks, and geeks.

Peach welcome to the forum.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/07/2026 at 09:10:56