Ron Paul the Liberal?

HR 2605 IH


110th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 2605
To establish a sunset for the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107-243).


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES


June 7, 2007

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. MICHAUD, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. ELLISON, and Mrs. BOYDA of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A BILL
To establish a sunset for the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107-243).

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,


SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Sunset of Public Law 107-243 Act of 2007'.


SEC. 2. SUNSET OF PUBLIC LAW 107-243.

The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107-243) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:


`SEC. 5. SUNSET.

`This joint resolution shall cease to be effective beginning 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Sunset of Public Law 107-243 Act of 2007.'.


SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

Nothing in the amendment made by section 2 of this Act shall be construed to prevent or prohibit Congress in the 180-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act from--

(1) reauthorizing Public Law 107-243, with or without amendment, as appropriate; and

(2) passing a new authorization for the use of military force against Iraq or a declaration of war against Iraq, as appropriate.

Well, thanks for the proof that you have no intention in being honest in your disingenuous critisisms. Anyone reading this can see right through you. Try researching instead of copy pasting, or don't, it's not like you could lose credibility, you didn't have any to start with.

Researching? Check the link at the bottom, everything is either his voting record, how he was rated by an independant company, or direct quotes from Paul himself. Exactly how is that not researched?

Not all of us suck from the teet of Ron Paul 2008 — Hope for America cause we aren't big on...

Because you do not know WHY. Knowing WHY is the key to understanding something. It's called context, you have none.

awwww, when in doubt and without anything else to prove your point fall back on "context", the cure all politcal salve

you fail, and I'm still not voting for that cynical cowardly yokel

not exactly

his voting record and the independent analysis I provided is far more accurate then rebuttal from his cheerleaders