totally out of line, this just provides more proof of the need for the troop surge. We should have went with the suggested number of 300,000 back in 2003.
Funny enough, the most damaging thing they could do to the American cause is let them go unharmed.
0 Replies
Pinochet73
1
Reply
Tue 15 May, 2007 05:02 am
@Silverchild79,
Yeah....I'm sure the savages have tortured them to death and chopped up their bodies by now. After all, they're devout Muslims, following closely the example and teachings of Mohammad. But.....as GW had to say ever since 911, "They're a peace-loving people."
0 Replies
Silverchild79
1
Reply
Tue 15 May, 2007 10:38 am
@Silverchild79,
no calls for genocide please
0 Replies
Pinochet73
1
Reply
Tue 15 May, 2007 05:47 pm
@Silverchild79,
"...no calls for genocide please..."
Don't read too much into things. Nobody's calling for genocide. If that's your interpretation, good for you. That doesn't mean it's right.:headbang:
0 Replies
Azmr
1
Reply
Wed 16 May, 2007 01:06 pm
@Silverchild79,
Behead them! Thats the captured invaders only option. Its not a game were you get caught you can restart and try or avoid it lol. This is war, you get caught....your lifes over.
**** you. I'd like tangle with you, Chump. I'd turn you into a brown, slimey pretzel.
0 Replies
92b16vx
1
Reply
Wed 16 May, 2007 07:34 pm
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;16170 wrote:
Sounds good, when do we start on the guys we captured?
If it makes you feel better, I have seen some wicked ruthless **** done to detainees.
0 Replies
Reagaknight
1
Reply
Thu 17 May, 2007 11:40 am
@Silverchild79,
Yeah, call me out for the sarcastic comment in response to the totally acceptable one about behading U.S. troops, not the guy who made the original comment.
Azmr,
You are correct in assuming that the enemies who have captured the missing soldiers employ that particular philosophy. Which is why the U.S. must seek out and destroy every last one of them. The war against terrorism is a war against Islam, because they are one in the same entity.
Yeah, call me out for the sarcastic comment in response to the totally acceptable one about behading U.S. troops, not the guy who made the original comment.
Is that in response to me?
0 Replies
Reagaknight
1
Reply
Thu 17 May, 2007 12:34 pm
@Silverchild79,
Yes..
0 Replies
92b16vx
1
Reply
Thu 17 May, 2007 12:42 pm
@Silverchild79,
Do you have a persecution complex or something? I was simply saying that while no, I haven't seen anyone beheaded in our charge, I have seen some that wish they had been. Actually, it was our Iraqi counterparts, but still.
0 Replies
Reagaknight
1
Reply
Thu 17 May, 2007 01:04 pm
@Silverchild79,
Persecution complex? No, I really don't care.
0 Replies
rugonnacry
1
Reply
Thu 17 May, 2007 01:16 pm
@92b16vx,
92b16vx;16345 wrote:
That is quite possibly, one of the most ignorant statements ever.
Right up there with "America is a peace loving nation" (Yes I meant to say America)
Right up there with "America is a peace loving nation" (Yes I meant to say America)
That one always cracks me up.
0 Replies
Pinochet73
1
Reply
Thu 17 May, 2007 04:50 pm
@Silverchild79,
Use more napalm.
0 Replies
Volunteer
1
Reply
Thu 17 May, 2007 06:36 pm
@Azmr,
Azmr;16167 wrote:
Behead them! Thats the captured invaders only option. Its not a game were you get caught you can restart and try or avoid it lol. This is war, you get caught....your lifes over.
I guess that is true for unlawful combatants. Maybe we should take the gloves off and start to treat those on your side as the Geneva Convention allows for unlawful combatants. But we won't, our politicians (and the public they serve) don't have the backbone. They will though if your side is successful in one of its battle plans outside the southwest asia area of operations. They'll get real nasty real fast if something overt happens here in the good ol USofA.
Hey, have you seen the new Marine Corps challenge coin?
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace