1
   

Society and it's role?

 
 
missdixy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Jun, 2007 02:31 am
@socalgolfguy,
socalgolfguy;23237 wrote:
Listen clan - what happens long before the age of 12 is far more of a determining factor of how you will evolve as a man. By 12, without a solid foundation, that child has little chance for a good life.


Uh oh.
So, does that mean I'm pretty much screwed for life? :p
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Jun, 2007 09:19 am
@missdixy,
missdixy;23435 wrote:
Uh oh.
So, does that mean I'm pretty much screwed for life? :p


Heck no. You're at the beginning of your glorious adventure through life. And congrats on your achievements, so far.

I somewhat disagree with the business about juvenile molding. We can change, for as long as we live, if we truly want to and try hard to effect deep-seated change. I am what's known as a covert person who stutters. I grew up and lived for FITTY years trying to hide my stuttering, which really hosed me over, psychologically. Since my discovery of my condition, I have changed A LOT, all for the better. It can be done. We are constantly evolving. :headbang:
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Jun, 2007 09:31 am
@missdixy,
missdixy;23435 wrote:
Uh oh.
So, does that mean I'm pretty much screwed for life? :p

No. It means you are at a disadvantage then most others. Key difference to you is knowing that difference.


Amen pino!
0 Replies
 
Red cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Jun, 2007 06:48 pm
@aaronssongs,
aaronssongs;23248 wrote:
Only when the playing field is level, and people are judged by the content of their character, and their talents instead of the color of their skin, or who they know, will that be true...you can talk all you want out the left side of your face...but until you walk in somebody else's shoes, instead of your Kenneth Coles, you need to be quiet.
And truth be told, some get pushed more than others...or do you deny "white privilege" exists?
And "those of us that aren't weak", isn't a question,, and doesn't deserve a question mark...equal opportunity syntax police. Geez.


More socialist tripe, the color of one skins is only a deterent if they deem it to be. With hard work and determination anyone can achieve what ever they want. The sky is the limit, the only limits are those we impose on ourselves.

I remember this poem from High School: It's my motto in life.

You can do what ever you think you can but you will never acomplish more for if your are afraid of yourself young man/woman there is nothing for you in store.

For failure comes from inside first, it's there if you only knew it and you can win though you face the worst if you feel you can do it.

Author Unknown.

Individual accountability needs to be part of our culture in the west again, the socialists have used immigrants and persons of color to further their agenda. It helps them get re-elected if they can find those whom they deem to be the down trodden and pander to them to get votes. They could careless about the down trodden, only getting elected. Jessie Jackson and the ACLU come to mind.
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Jun, 2007 06:59 pm
@Red cv,
"white privilege" exists?"

Yeah, right. White??????? What's that? Hold your breath. When you can't take it any longer, breathe, and see that Whites exist NO MORE. Whom will you complain about once Whitie is GONE?????????????? He is modebly on his way OUT, Dude. His day is just about OVER. But don't gloat. Because almost all societies value light skin, the lighter-skinned folks within the new dark world order will probably emerge as leaders and aristocrats. Sorry.
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2007 01:22 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;23586 wrote:
"white privilege" exists?"

Yeah, right. White??????? What's that? Hold your breath. When you can't take it any longer, breathe, and see that Whites exist NO MORE. Whom will you complain about once Whitie is GONE?????????????? He is modebly on his way OUT, Dude. His day is just about OVER. But don't gloat. Because almost all societies value light skin, the lighter-skinned folks within the new dark world order will probably emerge as leaders and aristocrats. Sorry.


Good to have you back. In my community, all residents are restricted to buying just one home in an effort to keep investors at bay. One investor insisted on purchasing multiple homes and played the race card in order to beat the system. The builder caved - now he owns 3, all rentals, to multiple families, in some cases. Any so called "Minority" individual that is aggressive can work the work the establishment for their own benefit.
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Jun, 2007 02:21 pm
@Red cv,
Yeah.....Whitie is doomed. But, he opted for materialism instead of making babies and building big families. So, he's primarily to blame for his own impending demise. The same thing will happen to lightly complected non-Whites, once they take charge of the emergent dark societies in our mists. They'll make more money, give up procreation, and fall. It's a continuous process, driven exclusively by money. The more a person makes, the less inclined he is to have kids. He wants time to spend his money on himself. It's capitalism at its finest or worst, depending on one's individual perspective.
0 Replies
 
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jun, 2007 09:50 am
@Red cv,
I've said it many times, all personal freedoms without discipline leads to anarchy.
One Man Clan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jun, 2007 10:41 am
@socalgolfguy,
socalgolfguy;23861 wrote:
I've said it many times, all personal freedoms without discipline leads to anarchy.


Tell me, what is "disciplined freedom"?

How can anarchy EVER be freedom?
0 Replies
 
socalgolfguy
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jun, 2007 11:32 am
@Red cv,
Read it, no explanation is necessary. Your inattention is tedious.
One Man Clan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jun, 2007 11:59 am
@socalgolfguy,
socalgolfguy;23877 wrote:
Read it, no explanation is necessary. Your inattention is tedious.


I'm sorry, but it seems in my case explanation is necessary.
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jun, 2007 12:29 pm
@socalgolfguy,
socalgolfguy;23861 wrote:
I've said it many times, all personal freedoms without discipline leads to anarchy.


This is so very true. Yet Liberals cannot or will not recognize that fact. To them, freedom itself is defined as anarchy, and in extreme cases, all-out debauchery and destruction. Liberal extremists actually hate life, and want to kill it in the name of their so-called 'freedom'. In the name of their truncated 'freedom and love', for example, Liberals in the West fought tooth-and-nail for Marxism throughout the later 19th Century and 20th Century -- Marxism, one of the most horrific murder-doctrines ever to be institutionalized. :no:
One Man Clan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jun, 2007 02:20 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;23886 wrote:
This is so very true.


Bullshit in full.

Quote:
To them, freedom itself is defined as anarchy, and in extreme cases, all-out debauchery and destruction.


Absolute bullshit. Freedom has nothing to do with anarchy.

Quote:
Liberal extremists actually hate life, and want to kill it in the name of their so-called 'freedom'. In the name of their truncated 'freedom and love', for example, Liberals in the West fought tooth-and-nail for Marxism throughout the later 19th Century and 20th Century -- Marxism, one of the most horrific murder-doctrines ever to be institutionalized. :no:


Marxism has absolutely nothing to do with freedom.
0 Replies
 
Red cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jun, 2007 03:15 pm
@Red cv,
Marxism teaches sheeple that it's all about "Power to the people" a dangerous and flawed idiology to say the least.

I read this the other day and it's 80% true.

Islam and the left hate individual liberty.

Liberals hate for people to be independant from the state.

Islam hates that people have a choice of religion hence they become united in their dream of utopia.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/28/2024 at 06:57:08