1
   

White House deleting hard drives etc.

 
 
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2008 05:56 pm
@rugonnacry,
rugonnacry;55336 wrote:
You're right, Bush The man You and those conspiracy theorists like you, cant stand, Think is inept and ignorant, to stupid to get out of bed every morning with out help. Only became president because of daddys money, cant speak the english language BLAH BLAH BLAH and every other whiny little bitch dems complaint about a TWO term president (If was as bad as YOU say would not have made a second term... EVEN WITH DADDYS money..... Daddy couldnt buy his OWN 2nd term) I s able to pull of the greatest conspiracy since a 13 year old virgin giving birth to the Messiah, then you really need a nap.

You can not be taken seriously by spouting HE IS DUMB while in the same setence HE HAS FOOLED US ALL
Yeah, they all got duped by the chimp, speaks highly of there intelligence eh? Even the brits swollowed it hook, line and and sinker. And us conservative are the sheep. But who do the real sheep follow, B Hussein Obama, LOL. Now that takes the cake.
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2008 05:58 pm
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;55337 wrote:
And you can't be taken seriously if you break down into a temper tantrum every time someone delivers a question you can't answer. You have no rational response as to how this raw data could just go *poof* in all its forms and in all its locations without someone intentionally wanting it gone.

You KNOW that's the only answer that makes sense. You simply don't want to admit it... whether to yourself or to this particualr board is up for debate.

So, do you have a rational response, or... rugonnacry?

And you as your posts indicate, believe in conspiracy theory's.
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2008 06:00 pm
@rugonnacry,
rugonnacry;55345 wrote:
Im looking for a temper tantrum.... Dont see as where I had one. I can see how talking to yo9u in a way a five year old could understand, could be taken as condescending... and if condescending and temper tantrums are the same to you then google websters dictionary for clarification .


To continue on about temper tantrums, how many times have you been banned from this site for such an occurrence?

(Sits by and awaits the next conspiracy theory.) Perhaps Chocolate milk really comes from brown cows but Bush doesnt want any one to know that so he can keep the Chocolate prices in his favor.

Touche'
0 Replies
 
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2008 06:03 pm
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;55423 wrote:
From TFA:



It's called IMAP! I can set up a server with this software FOR FREE. Solves the problem.

Don't bulls*it.
Well set me up one big shot.
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2008 06:05 pm
@Numpty,
Numpty;55433 wrote:
Well from my limited knowledge of how all that good stuff works I do know that at work when I send or am sent emails thay are 'sense' checked and a back up made for retrieval, the sense check is so there is no malicious code or internal spam emails.

That sound familiar to anyone else's work place?

Seems to me MR Sabz is mearly throwing a question out there for debate, yet his character and reputation are being questioned, something I seem to see more and more on this site I am afraid, bully boy tactics i think one may call them.
Hope those are all work related. You don't cheat your employer do you?
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2008 08:42 pm
@Numpty,
Numpty;55433 wrote:
Well from my limited knowledge of how all that good stuff works I do know that at work when I send or am sent emails thay are 'sense' checked and a back up made for retrieval, the sense check is so there is no malicious code or internal spam emails.

That sound familiar to anyone else's work place?

Seems to me MR Sabz is mearly throwing a question out there for debate, yet his character and reputation are being questioned, something I seem to see more and more on this site I am afraid, bully boy tactics i think one may call them.


Damn. You poor guy. :headbang:
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2008 05:16 am
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;55440 wrote:
And you as your posts indicate, believe in conspiracy theory's.


Evidence of such?

The only thing your posts seem to indicate is an inability to properly use punctuation.
0 Replies
 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2008 05:20 am
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;55442 wrote:
Well set me up one big shot.


Sure thing! I've got an old Athlon under my desk, couple of hard drives and some ram...

Oh, did I mention that all the software for this is free? Yeah, it's this thing called "Linux".


It seems that the more you dig, the closer you get to 'my turf'.



EDIT: HOWTO Secure Mail Server using Dovecot - Gentoo Linux Wiki Hereya go.
0 Replies
 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Apr, 2008 07:07 am
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;55439 wrote:
Yeah, they all got duped by the chimp, speaks highly of there intelligence eh? Even the brits swollowed it hook, line and and sinker. And us conservative are the sheep. But who do the real sheep follow, B Hussein Obama, LOL. Now that takes the cake.


And you so happily use the "B Hussein Obama" line that's been fed to you by the talking heads of the Right.

Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaah.
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2008 09:41 am
@Sabz5150,
I bring this to the top

An elephant never forgets? George W. Bush's lost e-mails: Page 1

So, let me get this straight...

They *HAD* an email system working WITH A FUNCTIONAL BACKUP SYSTEM IN PLACE, which they decided to swap out for one that does NOT have said backup system... instead using humans to sift through millions of emails.

Cool, so these emails are not "lost", merely being sorted... okay, why haven't you presented them. What about backups? Don't tell me you didn't make backups before changing a critical section of a network's structure.

On top of that, once it was in place, human sifting and all... they complained it was too slow. Scrapped again! Another contractor came in to do the work... causing a top level tech to quit in anger.

How do you screw up on this level?! Oh wait, same admin that brought us Iraq and our strong economy. Nevermind...
0 Replies
 
g-man
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 May, 2008 08:24 pm
@rex b,
Is making "all" verbal activity in the oval office available a matter of law?
Should all conversations taking place in the offices of senators and congressmen be recorded as well?
Perhaps a new department should be developed. The office of monitoring elected official's conversations.

I wonder if all verbal exchanges and other guttural sounds produced in Bill Clinton's office when Monica was present were recorded.....?
Numpty
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 May, 2008 02:30 am
@g-man,
g-man;57199 wrote:
Is making "all" verbal activity in the oval office available a matter of law?
Should all conversations taking place in the offices of senators and congressmen be recorded as well?
Perhaps a new department should be developed. The office of monitoring elected official's conversations.

I wonder if all verbal exchanges and other guttural sounds produced in Bill Clinton's office when Monica was present were recorded.....?


Well, all your telephone, cell phone, emails and internet usage can be monitored without your knowledge, and the average Joe is recorded on cctv approximately 300 times a day.

So yeah why not, at the end of the day what have senators and congressmen got to talk about that isn't to do with the 'best interests' of the people who put them in power?
Numpty
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 May, 2008 02:34 am
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;55456 wrote:
Damn. You poor guy. :headbang:


Actually I am quite affluent and own two houses :FU1:

Or were you refeing to my post and the only thing you could come up with was a cheap shot, like ALWAYS :beat:
0 Replies
 
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 May, 2008 10:01 am
@g-man,
g-man;57199 wrote:
Is making "all" verbal activity in the oval office available a matter of law?
Should all conversations taking place in the offices of senators and congressmen be recorded as well?
Perhaps a new department should be developed. The office of monitoring elected official's conversations.

I wonder if all verbal exchanges and other guttural sounds produced in Bill Clinton's office when Monica was present were recorded.....?


i would have state officials monitored before i'd have the American people monitored. :thumbup:
g-man
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 May, 2008 11:52 am
@Numpty,
Numpty;57203 wrote:
Well, all your telephone, cell phone, emails and internet usage can be monitored without your knowledge, and the average Joe is recorded on cctv approximately 300 times a day.

So yeah why not, at the end of the day what have senators and congressmen got to talk about that isn't to do with the 'best interests' of the people who put them in power?


I have no problem with phone calls being monitored. If some agent wants to sit and listen to me talk love talk to my wife, he may learn the value of respect and true love. He may also get to know some electrical terminology if he listens long enough. I suspect when he hears no reference to bio-weaponry or bombs or drugs, he'll lose interest quickly.
I suspect that if congress is ignorant enough to legislate laws forcing themselves to install listening devices in their offices, they are not stupid enough to carry on incriminating conversations within that office. So, we'll be paying for installation of worthless devices and a lot of dinners where unscrupulous conversations will actually occur.
g-man
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 May, 2008 11:54 am
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;57211 wrote:
i would have state officials monitored before i'd have the American people monitored. :thumbup:


I would have suspects of crime and terror monitored. Unfortunately, the science of determining who "is" suspect is not exact. Causing me to give latitude to agents.
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 May, 2008 12:55 pm
@g-man,
g-man;57213 wrote:
I would have suspects of crime and terror monitored. Unfortunately, the science of determining who "is" suspect is not exact. Causing me to give latitude to agents.


curious.

Thats precisely the reason i wouldn't give them 'latitude'.
g-man
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 May, 2008 01:17 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;57217 wrote:
curious.

Thats precisely the reason i wouldn't give them 'latitude'.


I believe you. I also believe that immediately after a terrorist attack, you may well be one of those with the accusation of "incompetence and neglect".
Numpty
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 May, 2008 05:33 pm
@g-man,
g-man;57213 wrote:
I would have suspects of crime and terror monitored. Unfortunately, the science of determining who "is" suspect is not exact. Causing me to give latitude to agents.


When one is given latitude then begins the erosion of all you hold dear. The rights your founding fathers fought for are are lost in the persuit of them.

Anti-terror laws used to spy on family - Home News, UK - The Independent

this is plymouth - news, entertainment, jobs, homes and cars

Terror law is used to spy on youngsters | Metro.co.uk

AND SO IT BEGINS

No government has the right to spy on it's citizens unless the those citezens give up and allow insidious people the opportunity to dictate to the citezens under the provisiery they have your best interests at heart.


Wake up and smell the proverbial roses
g-man
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 May, 2008 07:24 pm
@Numpty,
Numpty;57225 wrote:
When one is given latitude then begins the erosion of all you hold dear. The rights your founding fathers fought for are are lost in the persuit of them.

Anti-terror laws used to spy on family - Home News, UK - The Independent

this is plymouth - news, entertainment, jobs, homes and cars

Terror law is used to spy on youngsters | Metro.co.uk

AND SO IT BEGINS

No government has the right to spy on it's citizens unless the those citezens give up and allow insidious people the opportunity to dictate to the citezens under the provisiery they have your best interests at heart.

Wake up and smell the proverbial roses


The founding fathers. You think that terrorist such as Timothy McViegh gave a damn about the founding fathers? Do you think that other malcontents who may muster the courage to act on the idea that they "have a better idea" give thought to the ideas of the founding fathers?
Government has the honor to have the duty to protect the people from foreign and domestic threats. Tying their hands and holding them responsible, then accusing them of incompetence when they fail simply makes no sense.
Investigative organizations, including media are the watchdogs who can insure righteous behavior by agencies with the task of finding threats to the nation.

The proverbial roses wilted and died on 9-11-01.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.35 seconds on 01/11/2025 at 11:28:02