Reply Tue 23 Sep, 2008 11:36 am
Another hard hitter from Mike Adams, it's amazing he's still alive knowing what these femaNazi's will stoop too. They must take into account his arsenal.

Mike S. Adams :: Townhall.com :: Put Lipstick on a Feminist and She?s Still a Prig

Just a few Fridays ago I got the good news about the addition of Sarah Palin to the 2008 Republican ticket. I was so excited I fired off a few rounds from my assault rifle and then hopped in the car and drove back to my office at UNC-Wilmington. I wanted to talk to some of the feminists in my department about this great breakthrough in the struggle for gender equality.

Of course, none of the feminists were in the office in the hours after Sarah Palin’s introduction as John McCain’s running mate. Maybe they were off celebrating the great moment in women’s history. I think it’s more likely they were field dressing a moose. Regardless, I was just glad to spend an afternoon at the office without having to look at a feminist.

I guess in some ways the lack of feminist enthusiasm for Palin was to be expected. But I never could have expected the cumulative hostility feminists have already shown towards Palin. One of my students recently told me that his feminist professor – in the midst of a classroom lecture, no less – deemed Palin to be unqualified to serve as Vice President because she could not control her 17-year old daughter.

It is certainly interesting to hear feminists talking about the need to control other women’s bodies. But an even more interesting question arises in the context of the call for parental control over the body of Bristol Palin: How can parents possibly control the bodies of their teenaged daughters in light of feminist opposition to parental notification laws?

This situation with Bristol Palin and with Sarah Palin’s youngest son really seems to be a large part of the feminist hostility towards the Palin candidacy. The Palins are adamantly pro-life and they live lives in accordance with their pro-life views. Indeed, Bill O’Reilly suggested recently – to a nodding Laura Ingraham – that the feminist hatred of Sarah Palin was solely about the issue of abortion.

I disagree that this hostility is all about abortion. I think it also has a lot to do with Palin’s personality – specifically with her personal courage and ability to think and act independently.

__________________________________

click for the rest.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 839 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 03:47 am
@Drnaline,
Again your wonderful right slant blogs get it wrong.

Besides... why is she pro-life? Because a book and a person in a pulpit tells her? Yeah, independent thinking right there.

Try again Sanchez. :rollinglaugh:
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 11:09 am
@Drnaline,
Why was your mother prolife? Maybe because she figured you were worth something? When you were in her womb, did she call you a baby or a parasite? You disagree with her decision to keep you? How many kids were you apart of aborting? You have kids, why did you keep them?
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 08:24 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;60155 wrote:
Why was your mother prolife? Maybe because she figured you were worth something? When you were in her womb, did she call you a baby or a parasite? You disagree with her decision to keep you? How many kids were you apart of aborting? You have kids, why did you keep them?


Perhaps she wanted a child. Ever think of that?

Why did I keep my kid? I wanted a child. It's that easy. I don't need any moral justifications for my need to keep a child and I sure as hell don't need to answer to you.

But this really isn't about choice, now is it? Bristol doesn't have any. She's doing whatever makes mommy happy and keeps the evangelicals rallying. Why else would they say that Sarah is making the right choice... instead of Bristol.

Didn't Levi say he didn't want kids? I thought so.


Abstinence. It works! Oh, wait... :rollinglaugh: Didn't have a choice there, either.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 09:52 pm
@Drnaline,
Quote:
I don't need any moral justifications for my need to keep a child and I sure as hell don't need to answer to you.
For your need to keep a kid? Sounds like you didn't have a choice.
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 10:01 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;60181 wrote:
For your need to keep a kid? Sounds like you didn't have a choice.


I was given the choice. I made the choice to keep the child. And yes, I need a child or two... gotta pass down my knowledge, heritage and all of my goodies to somebody. Do my part to forward humanity as a whole.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 10:05 pm
@Drnaline,
You made the choice or your girlfriend did? So what of the womens sole authority over her body and whats in it? You can adopt and do the same thing.
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 10:08 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;60193 wrote:
You made the choice or your girlfriend did? So what of the womens sole authority over her body and whats in it? You can adopt and do the same thing.


She said "You can make the decision". She didn't want to shoulder the weight, so I manned up and did it for her.

Notably, I am no longer with her... not being able to "man up" seemed to be a recurring theme after a while.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 10:20 pm
@Drnaline,
Sorry to hear that, relations are hard to maintain even without children. You never married either?
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 10:21 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;60206 wrote:
Sorry to hear that, relations are hard to maintain even without children. You never married either?


Not her.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Sep, 2008 10:23 pm
@Drnaline,
So you believe in the sanctity of married?
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Sep, 2008 10:43 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;60209 wrote:
So you believe in the sanctity of married?


Marriage to me is a declaration that I will stand beside my partner until they box me up and put me in the ground. It is an oath of loyalty and fidelity that I make as a person which places my utmost trust in another.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Sep, 2008 07:45 am
@Drnaline,
Did you marry by a JP?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/12/2025 at 09:42:28