1
   

Affirmative Actions days are numbered

 
 
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Nov, 2006 06:56 pm
@Curmudgeon,
if it was 60/40 it might, but I won't see it in my lifetime.Our culture doesn't seem to appeal to minorities.
0 Replies
 
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Nov, 2006 01:08 pm
@Curmudgeon,
I agree with Bill O'Reilly on one thing:

Affirmative action is needed, but should be based on financial background
and need only!
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Nov, 2006 01:21 pm
@oleo,
oleo, is that really you?Very Happy Very Happy

If conditions are as bad as some areas suggest, I agree that it is needed. The biggest problem I see are the school systems. There is a huge difference between white schools and the schools with a large segment of minorities.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Nov, 2006 07:49 am
@Drnaline,
Disrimination is just that, no matter how you justify it.
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Nov, 2006 03:56 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;7616 wrote:
Disrimination is just that, no matter how you justify it.


So, affirmative action is discrimination? Please tell me how, especially if it is applied to all races based solely on economic need?

At the time it was put into action affirmative action programs were needed.

That was 30+ years ago, and they definitely should be evaluated to see if they work, are still needed or are serving the general interests of the nation.

People hire or admit people they're comfortable with, and people are comfortable with people like themselves, and that causes a lack of diversity in most cases.

The obvious answer is to just let computers blindly pick the best qualified and highest scoring candidates for anything,

So, are you as qualified for whatever you do as someone who went to an Ivy League school?
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Nov, 2006 05:44 pm
@Drnaline,
Quote:
So, affirmative action is discrimination? Please tell me how, especially if it is applied to all races based solely on economic need?


In that case it isn't affirmative action... it's just aide period Wink
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Nov, 2006 07:31 pm
@Brent cv,
Brent;7625 wrote:
In that case it isn't affirmative action... it's just aide period Wink


I guess, if affirmative action has to mean only one thing instead of being
two words put together to suggest a positive action to correct and unfair
situation.

It (like most things) isn't a black and white issue. In each area the concerns
are different and the actions are different. Actually, outside of government
agencies, institutions and the military it isn't compulsive, so most people's
arguements are uninformed, anyway.

I'm familiar with the civil service job grading scale, and it's not that big of a
deal (nor does it really stop people from just hiring people they or their
friends know, ultimately, which is how the world really works). As far as
"quotas," they are needed from my experience here in the south, because
people just hire people they know or their friends know if you don't make
them seek out an african-american or a hispanic or an asian, or a woman in
some cases. That only applies to government stuff. Private companies do
whatever they want.

African-americans and hispanics, on the average (which means "average,"
there are exceptions and this isn't claiming nothing can be done about it),
don't measure up to the educational achievement level of white americans starting in
kindergarten. You can definitely point to environmental and cultural reasons
why this would be the case, but how do you address it?

Lowering the standards hurts everybody across the board.

Making exceptions hurts the minorities that are exceptions.

Saying "tough, you've got to work harder to catch and measure up" isn't
going to get everybody up to the same level... some will be left behind.

So, do we just have an underclass that's left behind in this country, the
first of first world nations? Will they take that quietly and passively?

By the way, it isn't as immediate of a problem but lower (economic) class
whites are suffereing the same widening gap, particularly males, and it's
starting to spread up the class ladder: middle-class white males aren't doing
as well as they used to academically. You can't exactly blame minorities for
displacing them since they're doing much, much worse, so females and
women teachers seem to be the scapegoats. There's a slight bit of truth
in that, males need a certain bit of room to be aggressive in expressing
themselves in academic settings and that has been stifled over the last
20 years in classrooms. I think it comes down to a "culture war" problem:
it's not considered "manly" to be intelligent in a lot of American society
these days (and that certainly is the case in african-american and hispanic
lower and some middle-class society). The phenomenon can certainly be
split between red and blue states, and religious lines (being taught all
science is a fraud and the world is only 6,000 years old does get you
high S.A.T. scores). There's a big problem with white males in England, too.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Nov, 2006 10:03 pm
@oleo,
oleo;7623 wrote:
So, affirmative action is discrimination? Please tell me how, especially if it is applied to all races based solely on economic need?

At the time it was put into action affirmative action programs were needed.

That was 30+ years ago, and they definitely should be evaluated to see if they work, are still needed or are serving the general interests of the nation.

People hire or admit people they're comfortable with, and people are comfortable with people like themselves, and that causes a lack of diversity in most cases.

The obvious answer is to just let computers blindly pick the best qualified and highest scoring candidates for anything,

So, are you as qualified for whatever you do as someone who went to an Ivy League school?
Quote:
So, affirmative action is discrimination? Please tell me how, especially if it is applied to all races based solely on economic need?

What do you call it when you apply for a job, you are the most qualified yet they give it to a less qualified minority? It does not apply to all races. If you are white it counts against you.That in my book is discrimination.
Since when was it just for economic? It is used for promotions, salary increases, career advancement, school admissions, scholarships, and financial aid.
Quote:
People hire or admit people they're comfortable with, and people are comfortable with people like themselves, and that causes a lack of diversity in most cases.

So to you that is grounds to discriminate against them or force them to be diverse?
Quote:
So, are you as qualified for whatever you do as someone who went to an Ivy League school?
I've never seen any one from an Ivy league school frame a house. Or make Adobe walls. Is there a school for that? I would have to say i am more qualified for what i do. I think it's fun when we get a set of plans from an architect. They may know how to design a house but they sure don't know how to build one. They are two destinct things. They don't particularly like it when we have to tell them how to do there job.
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Dec, 2006 05:29 pm
@Drnaline,
What do you call it when you apply for a job, you are the most qualified yet they give it to a less qualified minority? It does not apply to all races. If you are white it counts against you.That in my book is discrimination.
Since when was it just for economic? It is used for promotions, salary increases, career advancement, school admissions, scholarships, and financial aid.


The most qualified people aren't always the ones hired in the first place. Hardly. The ones who know somebody will get it over them. Or the ones who are more physically attractive. Or the ones who don't intimidate the one doing the hiring who's insecure about their position. Or the one who has a more charming personality. Raises, promotions, etc. all work the exact
same way. If you have any real life experience you know this. It's reality.

So to you that is grounds to discriminate against them or force them to
be diverse?


When Uncle Sam is writing the paycheck, yes! the government is the servant of the people, and as such should reflect the make-up of society.
11% african-american and 11% hispanic, if qualified applicants are available.

I've never seen any one from an Ivy league school frame a house. Or make Adobe walls. Is there a school for that? I would have to say i am more qualified for what i do. I think it's fun when we get a set of plans from an architect. They may know how to design a house but they sure don't know how to build one. They are two destinct things. They don't particularly like it when we have to tell them how to do there job.

Okay, but would a blind computer selecting applications think an Architech
from Yale would have a better grasp of that stuff than you? Probably...

and that's the point. "Better qualified" is subjective. So there is no arguement against affirmative action based on that.

A common arguement used in all of this is that in hiring policemen and
fire fighters in big cities, they have to fill qoutas and take blacks and
hispanics that score lower on I.Q. tests and entrance exams than whites.
Okay, will the "smartest" applicant necessarily be the bravest or have the
quickest reflexes? If you can do the job well isn't that good enough. Do
you need an Ivy League diploma to be hard-working and dedicated?
Isn't it a lot like your statement about an architech framing a house?

The affirmative action programs regarding higher education seem to be the
ones getting the heat these days.
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Dec, 2006 06:20 pm
@oleo,
Here's a good, short, factual account of Affirmative Action in America that
doesn't take a side, just presents the information from a legal point of view.

http://www.infoplease.com/spot/affirmative1.html
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Dec, 2006 06:48 pm
@Drnaline,
Quote:
The most qualified people aren't always the ones hired in the first place. Hardly. The ones who know somebody will get it over them. Or the ones who are more physically attractive. Or the ones who don't intimidate the one doing the hiring who's insecure about their position. Or the one who has a more charming personality. Raises, promotions, etc. all work the exact
same way. If you have any real life experience you know this. It's reality.

I know that but were you discriminated against?
Quote:
When Uncle Sam is writing the paycheck, yes! the government is the servant of the people, and as such should reflect the make-up of society.
11% african-american and 11% hispanic, if qualified applicants are available.

Uncle same isn't writing the paycheck in most situations. What if there is now qualified applicant, should they hire a person who is not qualified just to meet your 11%, because that is what's happening.
Quote:
Okay, but would a blind computer selecting applications think an Architech
from Yale would have a better grasp of that stuff than you? Probably...

and that's the point. "Better qualified" is subjective. So there is no arguement against affirmative action based on that.

The blind computer will think what the programmer taught it to think. If race is asked for it consideration, it will be considered. Maybe even awarded extra points based on that info. If you applied for a job, site unseen and on that app you put that you were black, your qualifications being the same. Do you think you'd have a better chance of getting that job?
Quote:
Okay, will the "smartest" applicant necessarily be the bravest or have the
quickest reflexes?

No, but they were not tested for that either.
Quote:
If you can do the job well isn't that good enough.

So why take applications? Just ask them if there brave and have good reflexes.
Quote:
Do
you need an Ivy League diploma to be hard-working and dedicated?

Nope, i'm a good example of that.
Quote:
Isn't it a lot like your statement about an architech framing a house?

Yes it is almost exactly like my statement. The difference is, i didn't, nor have i ever used Affirmative Action to get any job i have ever had. I received it by my merit. Nothing else. I've owned and sold business's that were built on dedication and hard work. I don't need the government for anything. That is the reality in this world, get of your ass and earn what you want. Don't expect me to fund it for someone else because you think they were deprived. I've been there and done that and now i know the difference. Plenty of people have offered me handouts in my life, i could of taken them and been a ward of the state just like many of my friends. I chose different. They can step up and do the same thing. I'll expect nothing less of them.
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Dec, 2006 06:50 pm
@oleo,
oleo;7692 wrote:
Here's a good, short, factual account of Affirmative Action in America that
doesn't take a side, just presents the information from a legal point of view.

Affirmative Action History
I've got the same link. I like the part about it being temporary.
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Dec, 2006 06:59 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;7701 wrote:
I've got the same link. I like the part about it being temporary.


Every government program should be temporary. The world changes and
some things don't work to begin with... they have to be constantly evaluated.
0 Replies
 
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Dec, 2006 07:40 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;7699 wrote:
I know that but were you discriminated against?
Quote:


No, I've never been discriminated against, that I know of...

I am also a Louisiana Creole, as much native american, spanish and black
as french caucasion. I think legally, if someone used the old laws that
are still on the books here, I could be classified as "black," because after
the civil war that's what creoles were assigned to be, even though for
all intents and purposes we're our own race in a lot of ways, specifically
culturally (a european-based Louisiana culture that's pretty unique) and have
been that way longer than the U.S. has existed. We built this state, when
there was no one else around, then the U.S. purchased the territory from
France and slowly pushed us down the social ladder... or at least the
creoles who weren't so wealthy that they couldn't be pushed down (basically,
the old money types in New Orleans, now).

I've never used that to "get ahead" as far as a quota system, because I
had a pretty priviledged upbringing, and I don't need the help.

Then again, I get to choose, based on my appearance, whether I care to be
a minority or not. That's a big difference from someone who doesn't look
"white" like I do.

Drnaline;7699 wrote:
Uncle same isn't writing the paycheck in most situations. What if there is now qualified applicant, should they hire a person who is not qualified just to meet your 11%, because that is what's happening.


No, it isn't. Show me a documented case. It's only government sector, and
educational institutions, who get assistance from the government, and have
to meet those standards as a condition.

Drnaline;7699 wrote:
The blind computer will think what the programmer taught it to think. If race is asked for it consideration, it will be considered. Maybe even awarded extra points based on that info. If you applied for a job, site unseen and on that app you put that you were black, your qualifications being the same. Do you think you'd have a better chance of getting that job?


No, I don't. I work around this everyday.

Are you saying that programmers are inclined to be prejudiced a bit one
way or the other? They are human.

Yes, you get extra points on a civil service grade for being a minority,
and a woman, and a veteran, and handicapped, and having a college degree, and having so much experience.

Drnaline;7699 wrote:
Nope, i'm a good example of that.


Then you should understand.

Drnaline;7699 wrote:
Yes it is almost exactly like my statement. The difference is, i didn't, nor have i ever used Affirmative Action to get any job i have ever had. I received it by my merit. Nothing else. I've owned and sold business's that were built on dedication and hard work. I don't need the government for anything. That is the reality in this world, get of your ass and earn what you want.


Neither have I. I got a degree, and that and the work I do has done the rest. I got selected for the program i attended based on my grades and the
work I submitted, blind. I have a brain, I have a certain amount of social
charm handed down from my parents and that has allowed me to navigate
through life pretty well. I read a lot of sociology and philosophy and there's
a guy named Pierre Bourdieu who has a theory about something called
"habitus." Your behavior, movements, speech, everything constantly points
out your "class," and influences the way the world reacts to you. He's
pretty right about that, think about it. He correctly points out that minorities
are only discriminated against these days if they don't give off the right
habitus, indicating that they are mainstream and share the predominant
culture. From my experiences he's absolutely right about that, too. I know
people who profess to be outright racists but make exceptions for a few
people who "are different... they're just like me."

Drnaline;7699 wrote:
Don't expect me to fund it for someone else because you think they were deprived. I've been there and done that and now i know the difference. Plenty of people have offered me handouts in my life, i could of taken them and been a ward of the state just like many of my friends. I chose different. They can step up and do the same thing. I'll expect nothing less of them.



Whoa, who's asking you to fund anything? We're not talking about Wellfare,
this has to do with people who work for a living and are trying to get jobs.

Look, the real point is that if you have kids or have them someday you're
going to teach them to be self-reliant and not idiots and work for what they
want. Me too. We know that you can get what you want if you work for it,
and neither one of us would consider living on welfare preferable to what
we have, or even acceptable in any instance.

The real problem we face in this country is the people who don't have the
idea that they CAN get anything in a reasonable way like working for it.
They're not all minorities. So, when Bill O'Reilly says "Affirmative Action
should be based on economic need and not race," and he has to be referring
to education because that's the only place that would make sense, I agree
with him, because underpriviledged people need to be shown there's a
way for them to work at things and succeed.
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Dec, 2006 07:43 pm
@oleo,


Habitus in action.
0 Replies
 
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Dec, 2006 07:49 pm
@oleo,
Good post oleo.
0 Replies
 
Curmudgeon
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Dec, 2006 09:24 pm
@Drnaline,
Yes , a good post . I assumed that sort of result , but had not researched it much .
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Dec, 2006 08:18 am
@Drnaline,
Quote:
No, I've never been discriminated against, that I know of...

I ment the hipothetical question we are talking about, not if you really have.

Quote:
I've never used that to "get ahead" as far as a quota system, because I
had a pretty priviledged upbringing, and I don't need the help.

Then again, I get to choose, based on my appearance, whether I care to be
a minority or not. That's a big difference from someone who doesn't look
"white" like I do.
never used it for quota's, have you used it for something other then? I guess i can assume that since you look white some doors open for you just on that premise. But whether you know it or not it was also probably used against you in the same token. In which case you could of let them know, by definition you are a minority.
Quote:
No, it isn't. Show me a documented case. It's only government sector, and
educational institutions, who get assistance from the government, and have
to meet those standards as a condition.

As we all know the government has a long reach and can require even private contractors (a proivate business) to adhear to there biased policy.
Quote:
"Contractor Files Anti-Affirmative Action Suit Against San Francisco Air

Among other things, the ordinance requires contractors to either hire a
certain number of minority- and women-owned subcontractors or make a "good
faith effort" to do so. It also treats bids by minority- and woman-owned
businesses as if they are 5 percent to 10 percent lower than the actual bid.

I have alos heard of many a corporation being sued for discrimination by an applicant because they were not diverse enough. I've seen it with banks as well. Any body liberal minded and of a high enough position can and does use the premise of AA. You cannot say it just Government and higher learning.

Quote:
No, I don't. I work around this everyday.

Are you saying that programmers are inclined to be prejudiced a bit one
way or the other? They are human.

I believe otherwise. I am also saying they are prejudiced in some form or another and it is due to there humanity.
Quote:

Yes, you get extra points on a civil service grade for being a minority,
and a woman, and a veteran, and handicapped, and having a college degree, and having so much experience.
IMO i find that discriminatory.


Quote:
Then you should understand.

I do understand, i am not in agreement with it.
Quote:
Neither have I. I got a degree, and that and the work I do has done the rest. I got selected for the program i attended based on my grades and the
work I submitted, blind. I have a brain, I have a certain amount of social
charm handed down from my parents and that has allowed me to navigate
through life pretty well. I read a lot of sociology and philosophy and there's
a guy named Pierre Bourdieu who has a theory about something called
"habitus." Your behavior, movements, speech, everything constantly points
out your "class," and influences the way the world reacts to you. He's
pretty right about that, think about it. He correctly points out that minorities
are only discriminated against these days if they don't give off the right
habitus, indicating that they are mainstream and share the predominant
culture. From my experiences he's absolutely right about that, too. I know
people who profess to be outright racists but make exceptions for a few
people who "are different... they're just like me."

Agreed.
Quote:
Whoa, who's asking you to fund anything? We're not talking about Wellfare,
this has to do with people who work for a living and are trying to get jobs.
The government uses my taxes to enforce what is not my policy.
Quote:
The real problem we face in this country is the people who don't have the
idea that they CAN get anything in a reasonable way like working for it.

I think the problem is with the people that taught them what they believe. If it was there parents, who taught them? There is a responcible party here and i'd like to out them. They created a class of victims who think things are owed to them.
Quote:
They're not all minorities.

No there not, but they are the easyly exploited one's.
Quote:
So, when Bill O'Reilly says "Affirmative Action
should be based on economic need and not race," and he has to be referring
to education because that's the only place that would make sense, I agree
with him, because underpriviledged people need to be shown there's a
way for them to work at things and succeed.

I can agree with that. I also agree with tumble and curmy.
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Dec, 2006 01:30 am
@Drnaline,
Quote:
I guess i can assume that since you look white some doors open for you just on that premise.


Why would you assume that? Would it be that since I would "fit in" or seem to
with the group that is in the overwhelming majority population-wise and power-wise
in this country that would be an advantage?

It undeniably is, and that's the reason for Affirmative Action programs.

I'm proud of my heritage, and anyone who knows me even casually knows about
it. I could use my percentage of african-american, native american and maybe even hispanic to get some "special consideration" or bonus points, but I don't.
My parents both got Master's Degrees, I didn't have a deprived childhood. I'm
not one of the people those considerations were meant for, because my
background put me on an even playing field with the average American, or
actually maybe a little higher than that according to statistics I've read about
education and stuff on average. Great, so now I sound like a snob...

As for the example you sited, it's a contractor working for the airport in SF,
which is a government facility which makes them a government contractor
which makes them subject to the quotas.

Anti-Affirmative Action movements kind of crack me up, because they have to rest on the arguement that White Americans are being victimized, so the
people using this arguement have to be exactly what they're claiming to
be fighting. The majority group being mistreated by the establishment that
is elected by the majority group.

Anyway, it's not a black and white issue... I won't say nothing should be changed
but I haven't seen enough stuff pointing to a better way.

I do find black conservatives like Shelby Steele to have interesting views on
the whole thing:
Online NewsHour: A Dream Deferred-- November 30, 1998

I also would be "conservative" in my belief in assimilating into American
society for minorities. Especially for African-Americans... the Dutch didn't
go on slave raiding expeditions in Africa, they purchased subjugated tribes
from the tribes that conquered and enslaved them (for glass beads), so that
would, to me, cut out any wish to claim allegiance to that land.
oleo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Dec, 2006 02:25 am
@oleo,
Actually, Drnaline, here's another Shelby Steele-written article that makes
your arguement pretty effectively, from a black perspective, and concludes with
what I was saying about finding a way to help disadvantaged people regardless of race.

Debate Topics: Affirmative Action

So, I will agree that Affirmative Action can be harmful to minorities.
I don't agree that it is that harmful to white Americans, because they are
so many options and opportunities available to them.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 07:12:28