1
   

This is definately Bush's fault.

 
 
Reply Wed 11 Oct, 2006 06:00 pm
Budget Deficit Drops to $250 Billion

The federal budget deficit estimate for the fiscal year just completed has dropped to $250 billion, congressional estimators said Friday, as the economy continued to fuel impressive tax revenues.

The Congressional Budget Office's latest estimate is $10 billion below CBO predictions issued in August and well below a July White House prediction of $296 billion.

The improving deficit picture - Bush predicted a $423 billion deficit in his February budget - has been driven by better-than-expected tax receipts, especially from corporate profits, CBO said.

The 2005 deficit registered $318 billion; the record $413 billion deficit was posted in 2004.

At $250 billion, it would be the lowest since the $158 billion figure in 2002, the first deficit following four years of surpluses.

The CBO estimate continues a positive trend on the deficit after a grim deficit performance during President Bush's first term, and comes despite soaring war costs and $50 billion in emergency spending for hurricane relief.

House Budget Committee Chairman Jim Nussle, R-Iowa, credited the improving deficit numbers to "a responsible budget blueprint and pro-growth policies," even as Democrats pointed out that at $250 billion, the deficit is still one of the largest in history.

"Though today's estimates for 2006 are not as pessimistic as some earlier estimates, it is clear that the budget remains on the wrong track," said top budget panel Democrat John Spratt Jr. of South Carolina. "The Congressional Budget Office and even the Bush administration are estimating that deficits will be even larger next year."

White House budget chief Rob Portman said the economy's current performance, with the unemployment dropping to 4.6 percent in September and the Dow Jones industrial average hitting record highs this week, provided more evidence that the president's economic policies are working.

"This economy is strong and growing," Portman told reporters at a briefing. "This is a very strong indication that the president's tax relief program is working."

But when measured against the size of the economy, which is the comparison economists think is most important, the deficit picture looks even better.

At 1.9 percent of gross domestic product, the 2006 deficit registers far below those seen in the 1980s and early 1990s. The modern record of 6 percent of GDP came in 1983 and deficits greater than 4 percent in 1991 and 1992 drove Congress to embark on a 1993 deficit-cutting drive.

Still, the long-term deficit picture remains bleak due to the looming retirement of the Baby Boom generation, which threatens to swamp Social Security and the Medicare health care program for the elderly.

The CBO estimates reflect actual government revenues and expenditures through August and estimates for September. The Treasury and the White House budget office are expected to release official deficit numbers next week.

Tax receipts are up $253 billion, a whopping 12 percent over last year. That's the thirds consecutive year of strong revenue growth after a dismal performance in the early part of the decade. Revenues dropped three years in a row after fiscal 2000 but picked up again in 2004.

Taxes paid quarterly on corporate profits and by wealthier people and small businessmen were especially strong in 2006. Corporate income taxes rose 27 percent over 2005 while nonwithheld receipts increased 19 percent.

In contrast, income taxes and payroll taxes for Social Security, Medicare and unemployment insurance grew by only 7 percent. Critics of GOP economic policies say that's a sign that lower- and middle-income people aren't getting as much of a lift from the current recovery.

"The benefits of the economic expansion have not been equally distributed," said Jim Horney, a budget analysts for the liberal-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

? 2006 The Associated Press.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,470 • Replies: 29
No top replies

 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Oct, 2006 06:04 pm
@Drnaline,
Sorry Democrats, read it and wheep. From AP no less, LOL.
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Oct, 2006 08:14 pm
@Drnaline,
Considering Bush and company are the ones who created the deficit shouldn't they be the ones to reduce it?Very Happy
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Oct, 2006 10:31 pm
@Drnaline,
Bush and co. or congress?
0 Replies
 
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Oct, 2006 07:03 pm
@tumbleweed cv,
tumbleweed;5345 wrote:
Considering Bush and company are the ones who created the deficit shouldn't they be the ones to reduce it?Very Happy

of course! Good news and you just can't take it Smile

It must pain yourself to see good things happening
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Oct, 2006 07:10 pm
@Brent cv,
I think it's great the economy is doing well.

Speaking about the economy, is Bush taking credit for the trade deficit also?Very Happy
0 Replies
 
htmlmaster
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Oct, 2006 07:08 pm
@Drnaline,
Heh. Sweet. We're getting our cash back and fighting a war at the same time. Gotta love Conservatives. Anyway, to be honest, I don't see why a Democrat should complain about deficit spending. Weren't they all for it a few years back?
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Oct, 2006 07:14 pm
@htmlmaster,
Changing the subject are we.Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Oct, 2006 07:33 am
@Drnaline,
For the most part i allow off topic antics. I take it as having a some times heated conversation. Much like a family would have over a football came, wedding video, or any place where a close family would gather.
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Oct, 2006 07:36 am
@Drnaline,
I don't have any problem with smokescreens.Very Happy
0 Replies
 
GoodBoy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Oct, 2006 07:38 am
@Drnaline,
Obviously..what kinda weed you tumble?lol
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Oct, 2006 07:45 am
@GoodBoy,
Well........ the weed comes from my ancestors name. Tumble was the only thing I could think of that goes with weed, other than papers.Very Happy

I prefer to see both sides of the coin when referring to Bushs accomplishments.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Oct, 2006 05:16 pm
@Drnaline,
Dow closed at 11,997.? today. Damn are economy sucks. We should of hit 12 grand along time ago, like clint-oh wait. Clinton's economy never did that, LOL.
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Oct, 2006 05:52 pm
@Drnaline,
As good as the economy is it doesn't seem to be helping the Republicans much.

Voters seem to be more concerned about the performance of elected officials.

Not all aspects of the economy are doing as well as Wall Street. Just ask someone trying to sell a house.Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Oct, 2006 09:24 pm
@Drnaline,
I hear Sen Harry Reid's performance in unreported land deals is going great. Netted 1.1 cool million. He prabably would of got more if a house would of been on it. I also hear he is paying bonus's to his staff out of election funds? Think either of those may be illegal?
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Oct, 2006 02:55 am
@Drnaline,
If it wasn't illegal, he wouldn't be giving the money back.Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Oct, 2006 06:34 pm
@Drnaline,
I wonder if he reported his net gain on the land deal?
BonaParte cv
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Oct, 2006 05:38 pm
@Drnaline,
I love land deals, I do them all the time. Long live free enterprise!
You win some, you loose some.
Fifty years from now we'll all be dead and no one cares!
It's all a game....we'r just passing through. We'r pilgrims!
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Oct, 2006 09:33 pm
@Drnaline,
What if We Threw an Economic Boom and Nobody Noticed? by Mike Franc



Let's imagine a conversation between two political experts that might have taken place three months ago. One is a strong conservative, the other an equally strong liberal. All of the statistics and other facts mentioned below are, in fact, real.
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Oct, 2006 04:18 am
@Drnaline,
It seems even a good economy can't help a president who is going through a reality check.

The country is tired of him and his policies.:thumbup:

Even his scare tactics aren't working.He's a lame duck, even if his party remaines a majority.:headbang:
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » This is definately Bush's fault.
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/05/2026 at 02:52:55