What kind of signal are democrats sending now that Joe Lieberman has been defeated?

In my opinion, Joe Lieberman is one of the most honest, consistent politicians there is at this moment. While I know that those words combined together do not mean much I did like the guy for his consistency on issues. It's tough having to go against your own party but he has done it many times.

So what does the defeat mean to you? To me it means the Democrats are even more out of touch with the majority of Americans or that possible the majority of Americans have lost their damn minds by electing into office some of the most liberals politicians you can get. Somehow every time Ted Kennedy gets re-elected. I don't know how but I guess being senator of the only state that allows Gay Marriages has something to do with it. :dunno:

The guy that defeated him wants to pull out of Iraq. What is the purpose? We have lost to many good man in Iraq to accept defeat, which we would be doing, should we pull out of Iraq like he wants too. All he is doing is echoing the thoughts of the far left radicals like Michael Moore and George Soros.

I feel bad for Lieberman. I wouldn't have minded seeing him in the White House. While his social issues didn't go along well with mine, his foriegn policy was right on target.

It is a sad day.

Actually, on every poll, over 50% of Americans say Bush sucks. So, I guess the democrats are right on target. Lieberman was NOT a democrat...he was a closet republican who played kissy face with the president...don't believe me?

Here:

Actually, on every poll, over 50% of Americans say Bush sucks. So, I guess the democrats are right on target.

On the pick, you got one that's not editted? Why is Bush's shoulder in Lieb's armpit? You could of done a better job unless you pilft the pic from some where?

Please keep saying that to yourself over and over. The look on libs faces when they hit bottom is priceless. Then for december and january you mope around wondering how the rest of us can be so blind?
I'd like to see one pole that says "Bush sucks" one that at least two tousand people were polled or are you talking online blog poles because there even less reliable the the one you see in papers?
On the pick, you got one that's not editted? Why is Bush's shoulder in Lieb's armpit? You could of done a better job unless you pilft the pic from some where?

I aim to please....

Are you thinking about what you are doing? You are accussing Foxnews of being biased by linking us to an obviously bias media site.

That makes a whole lot of sense.

From what i've heard so far, he don't make much sense at all?

I think it fallows the party line rather nicely. I think we have nothing to worry about him ever proving any of it. They never usually plan that far ahead. My guess is he's just here to do laps around the liberal track. You know see how fast they can go know where. But that's just my opnion.