1
   

Biggest attack on free speech ever

 
 
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 01:27 am
This is HORRIBLE. I am extremely pissed off right now that the Bush administration is going to these levels. GTFO with your damn religion! It is not everyone's religion! Stop forcing your crap on everyone.

http://fotm.rotten.com/fotm/

Here is the law: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002257----000-.html

Quote:
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,182 • Replies: 23
No top replies

 
ndjs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 01:33 am
@Brent cv,
wow, i definitely agree here.

GTFO.
tumbleweed cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 04:05 am
@ndjs,
Isn't this a law that deals with child pornography? It seems to be aimed at websites or material that shows models portrayed in sexually explicit acts or photos.
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 08:47 am
@tumbleweed cv,
tumbleweed wrote:
Isn't this a law that deals with child pornography? It seems to be aimed at websites or material that shows models portrayed in sexually explicit acts or photos.


That is what they are trying to pass it off ass. However they know damn well that passing this law would not just affect Child porn sites but the porn industry all together as they knew that there was NO WAY they could do the things that they asked them too.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 06:19 pm
@Brent cv,
We'll the government had been asking them nicely to reform the way they practice there art. They chose not to and this is what came of it. I fail to see how it is an attack on freespeech? The link that is there they sure are still able to speak there peace.
Curmudgeon
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 07:42 pm
@Drnaline,
This law dates to at least 1978 , and was updated in 1990 and 2003 , and possibly other years as well , are you just now aware of it ?

The changes were necessary so as to include "computer generated images , digital image or picture " .

I see only regulation of pornograhy in this law , not denial of freedom of speech .
0 Replies
 
STEVE cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Feb, 2006 11:06 pm
@Brent cv,
Sexually frustrated brent?
I agree its ridiculous how the Bush administration is attacking all civil rights.
Curmudgeon
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 12:17 am
@STEVE cv,
STEVE wrote:

I agree its ridiculous how the Bush administration is attacking all civil rights.

Please educate me about the Administration attacking all civil rights .
STEVE cv
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 12:22 am
@Curmudgeon,
Curmudgeon wrote:
Please educate me about the Administration attacking all civil rights .

Patriot act and now this. Let me rephrase, alot of civil rights.
I understand we need to keep tabs of the terrorist, but its begining to seem like if george orwell could predict the future.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 07:08 am
@Brent cv,
How come the dems didn't consider George a prophet when Sklinton was in office? He was, literally spying on the public with no terrorist ties. Exactly what they are accusing W with?
0 Replies
 
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 04:04 pm
@Brent cv,
This is nothing more than Bush attacking the Porn industry which is a legal business in America by asking someone to do something near impossible. There were other ways to approach this but no, they took the most severe route.

Bush has a special division of the FBI just for the porn industry.

All the things wrong in this country and he attacks porn. Pathetic imo
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 04:06 pm
@Curmudgeon,
Curmudgeon wrote:
Please educate me about the Administration attacking all civil rights .


A lot of the Patriot act

I love my sig. Funny how the Republicans are for less Government yet since 2000 government has become more and more in our everyday lives.

The National ID card for instance is a joke
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Feb, 2006 07:18 pm
@Brent cv,
Brent wrote:
This is nothing more than Bush attacking the Porn industry which is a legal business in America by asking someone to do something near impossible. There were other ways to approach this but no, they took the most severe route.

Bush has a special division of the FBI just for the porn industry.

All the things wrong in this country and he attacks porn. Pathetic imo
It may be a legal business but showing kiddies and making money at it is very illegal. Like i said before, they were asked by congress to reform, of which they gave the big finger. Now our government gave it right back. That is the game we play.
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Feb, 2006 07:21 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline wrote:
It may be a legal business but showing kiddies and making money at it is very illegal. Like i said before, they were asked by congress to reform, of which they gave the big finger. Now our government gave it right back. That is the game we play.


Sorry but this did not stop "kiddie porn" by any extent.
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Feb, 2006 07:21 pm
@Brent cv,
Brent wrote:
A lot of the Patriot act

I love my sig. Funny how the Republicans are for less Government yet since 2000 government has become more and more in our everyday lives.

The National ID card for instance is a joke
We are for less government. But that does not include all that was made by the democraps. We have not made neer as much government as they have so we have a long way to go. I would prefer to delete all of there stuff and start over but i don't think that would go over well, LOL.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Feb, 2006 07:23 pm
@Brent cv,
Brent wrote:
Sorry but this did not stop "kiddie porn" by any extent.

It did not stop regular porn either. I ran through of few of my favorite porn haunts and every thing seems the same?
Brent cv
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Feb, 2006 07:29 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline wrote:
It did not stop regular porn either. I ran through of few of my favorite porn haunts and every thing seems the same?


because most of those websites have servers overseas Smile

rotten.com servers are located in America
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Feb, 2006 07:31 pm
@Brent cv,
Brent wrote:
because most of those websites have servers overseas Smile

rotten.com servers are located in America

sounds like it's time for an off shore!
0 Replies
 
ndjs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Feb, 2006 07:38 pm
@Brent cv,
Besides, rotten never had kiddie porn.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Feb, 2006 07:44 pm
@Brent cv,
There disadvantage was being american based. Kiddie porn or not the government can't discriminate with just the kiddie's. If they do it to one they must do it to all american based sites. I still do not see how it is an infringement to free speech?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Biggest attack on free speech ever
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/14/2024 at 06:47:53