I generally don't hold grudges . . . in your case, i make an exception, because you've been doing this for years, and, as i've pointed out, you recently said that you intend to attack me every time i post something you don't like.
I'm glad to hear that you've gone after Ionus, that would be a good thing. I don't notice that it's done any good, but he certainly deserves it. I probably didn't notice because i have ignored him for quite a while now.
You claim about a tu quoque
fallacy is nonsense, though. As i have pointed out, you have launched your personal attacks against me literally for years. There was the incident where the creep told Brooke that she shouldn't be allowed to reproduce, at which time you went after me for my remarks to him, rather than after him for his remarks to her. There was the incident in which Scrat said socialism was a failed system, to which i observed that the Chinese might not agree. Thomas and Habibi then both tried to claim that i was therefore an apologist for Chinese communism, so i called them a pair of planks. You came after me for that.
It's not that you comment on what i post, it's how you comment, and the consistency with which you comment. I just don't like your ******* attitude toward me, with a history of hostility over years, and the relentless nature of your attacks. So, if i can bait you, i will. This thread is a wonderful example of how easy it is to bait someone eaten up with their own vanity. You told that little creep Mark Noble to ignore me, that i was just baiting him. That is largely true, and it worked because he is so eaten up with vanity.
Works a treat with you, too.