Some of us r willing to be cordial n polite.
This, of course, is nonsense.
I shoud have said "sometimes." Accordingly, I amend my assertion to that effect.
I am perfectly willing to defend myself, when provoked.
With this joker, it is very much a case of whose ox has been gored.
When the subject is his obsessional condemnation of gun control,
all of his cordiality goes out the window.
That 's a lie
The last time that I discussed victim disarmament with Setanta,
I was perfectly cordial.
One of his favorite figures is that of gun control advocates dieing on their knees, begging for their lives.
; this is presumably their defensive strategy of choice;
if that is incorrect, Setanta is free to reveal how bravely thay defend themselves.
Maybe thay use pillows, or threaten to hit them with shoes, like Khrushchev.
(Was he your hero, Setanta?)
I have most recently seen him trot this out in a response to Parados.
That is another lie
; this prevarication is getting to be a habit.
I have not mentioned this in a long time
, probably not within a year.
In any case, it was not most recent
, as Setanta falsely alleges.
This appears to have resonated
with Setanta. ( a flash of tacit familiarity ?)
Perhaps he has frequent drills
with it, to see how fast he can get down there,
and how evocative
he can be in his begging,
in case of invasion of his home. I bet he 's good
If thay had an event in defensive grovelling
in the Olympics, I 'd bet on Setanta to bring home a medal for Canada.
can u GO
? While u are down there, Setanta,
do u approve of the defensive foot smooching
get on the burglar 's good side?
Show him how sweet
u can be, when threatened.
Setanta: a study in pathos
of the nether strata of life,
who coud surely bring a tear to the eye of any ol' burglar.
True Originalist Americans
take a different vu, tho.
We 'd rather die on our feet than live on our knees
and we believe that the best defense of our homes
is a good, disabling counterattack.
Parados can use an acid sarcasm, but i've never known him to use personal reflections unless repeatedly attacked himself.
Certainly i've never known him to address David in terms such as David was using in his response
to what Parados had posted.
"terms" are these??
This must be a joke.
Setanta is the foulest
, most abhorent, aberrant abuser of unprovoked
unjustified, maliciously aspersive invective on this forum; relative to him, everyone else is a saint.
Quite apart from that, mere cordiality is no measure of either virtue or morality.
Hitler was said to have been very fond of his dog.
That is an irrelevant non-sequitur
, of no probative value.
for dogs has no correspondence to cordiality.
Yet another lie from the mendacious mouth of Setanta
is that: " THIS PLACE SUCKS ! ! ! "