Reply
Mon 14 Jun, 2010 08:29 pm
Quote:The American political scientist Andrew Moravcsik makes the similar argument that European nations, singly and collectively, are the only states other than the US that are able to “exert global influence across the full spectrum from ‘hard’ to ‘soft’ power. Insofar as the term retains any meaning, the world is bipolar, and is likely to remain so over the foreseeable future.”
Is "full spectrum" just a very vague term? What it may possibly include or cover?
@fansy,
The full spectrum covers the whole gamut and then some.