Cyracuz
 
  1  
Tue 19 Apr, 2011 07:03 am
@guigus,
I simply realized that it does not matter what I say, because you will just ignore or misunderstand everything on an arbitrary basis.

There simply are not more ways to tell you that you are speaking empty words. I am curious to see how many people you will have to talk to on this forum now that I am done wasting my time on your bullshit.
JLNobody
 
  1  
Tue 19 Apr, 2011 10:21 am
@Cyracuz,
Good!
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Tue 19 Apr, 2011 05:11 pm
@JLNobody,
I actually thought I was missing something, but in the end I realized that this discussion was just making me miserable and foul mouthed.
guigus
 
  1  
Tue 19 Apr, 2011 08:29 pm
@Cyracuz,
Cyracuz wrote:

I simply realized that it does not matter what I say, because you will just ignore or misunderstand everything on an arbitrary basis.


It is you that are ignoring my arguments, for instance, this one:

Code:Nothing is not each being.
Not each being is not each being.
Any being is any other being.


It is written above, can you read it? If so, can you falsify it?

Cyracuz wrote:
There simply are not more ways to tell you that you are speaking empty words. I am curious to see how many people you will have to talk to on this forum now that I am done wasting my time on your bullshit.


You didn't tell me anything worthy so far, and you insulted me a lot. So it is you the champion of empty words.

Now talking about curiosity: which ones you consider "empty words" in my reasoning above? Do you disagree that nothing is not each being? If so, then which being do you think nothing is? And if you agree that nothing is not each being, then how can you escape the fact that "not each being" (nothing) is "not each being" (nothing)? And how can you avoid this meaning that "any being is any other being"?

Just curious.

0 Replies
 
guigus
 
  1  
Tue 19 Apr, 2011 08:34 pm
@Cyracuz,
Cyracuz wrote:

I actually thought I was missing something, but in the end I realized that this discussion was just making me miserable and foul mouthed.


Pay attention to your feelings...

Come on, react! Try falsifying this:

Code:Nothing is not each being.
Not each being is not each being.
Any being is any other being.


Soon you'll be dreaming of it...
0 Replies
 
guigus
 
  1  
Tue 19 Apr, 2011 08:37 pm
@JLNobody,
JLNobody wrote:

Good!


Interesting point!
0 Replies
 
guigus
 
  1  
Tue 19 Apr, 2011 08:41 pm
@Cyracuz,
Cyracuz wrote:

I actually thought I was missing something, but in the end I realized that this discussion was just making me miserable and foul mouthed.


What is making you miserable is your fight against your own reason. To begin with, do you disagree that nothing is not each being?
0 Replies
 
TheEnlightenedOne
 
  1  
Sat 30 Apr, 2011 12:19 pm
@mark noble,
That which can not be described with words exists. The "Awareness" word is a sign post pointing to that which cannot be described and the only thing that exists. All else is a part of this "Awareness" including the concept of "Nothing."
JLNobody
 
  1  
Sat 30 Apr, 2011 02:39 pm
@TheEnlightenedOne,
If I wanted koans I know of better places to get them.
TheEnlightenedOne
 
  1  
Sat 30 Apr, 2011 04:24 pm
@JLNobody,
Thank you for sharing you thoughts, they are enlightening.
0 Replies
 
guigus
 
  1  
Sun 1 May, 2011 07:09 pm
@TheEnlightenedOne,
TheEnlightenedOne wrote:

That which can not be described with words exists. The "Awareness" word is a sign post pointing to that which cannot be described and the only thing that exists. All else is a part of this "Awareness" including the concept of "Nothing."


This is better than many things I have heard (read) here, but it still misses the point: whatever exists is not something that can be or not be described, simply because it is not something "out there." Your very words betray the reason you must give up reason to address what exists: existence is not a static object, although static objects exist.
TheEnlightenedOne
 
  1  
Sun 1 May, 2011 07:45 pm
@guigus,
Paper, rock, scissors. Paper, rock, scissors. Paper, rock, scissors. Paper wins! Paper is that which can not be described but is the fabric of the universe that everything is painted on, including rock, scissors and the concept of nothing. We are a speck of dust on the big picture of the paper of the universe. No words, no concepts, concept of nothing, thoughts, electrons, neutrons, emotions, time, etc. exist without being interconnected. No-Thing exits, but it is not the nothing you are thinking about. No-Thing is Awareness. Space. Emptiness. The One. Presence. Big Mind. Ohmmm.
JLNobody
 
  1  
Sun 1 May, 2011 11:07 pm
@TheEnlightenedOne,
One can think of Nothing as really Everything. I do feel that when I die I will become both Nothing and Everything at the same time. But actually I (and you) are that now.
guigus
 
  1  
Mon 2 May, 2011 04:31 am
@TheEnlightenedOne,
TheEnlightenedOne wrote:

Paper, rock, scissors. Paper, rock, scissors. Paper, rock, scissors. Paper wins! Paper is that which can not be described but is the fabric of the universe that everything is painted on, including rock, scissors and the concept of nothing. We are a speck of dust on the big picture of the paper of the universe. No words, no concepts, concept of nothing, thoughts, electrons, neutrons, emotions, time, etc. exist without being interconnected. No-Thing exits, but it is not the nothing you are thinking about. No-Thing is Awareness. Space. Emptiness. The One. Presence. Big Mind. Ohmmm.


The nothing I am thinking about is the one that means nothing: there is no other. You are assuming just another unilateral view of nothing as only something: nothing is both something and nothing -- it is inherently ambiguous. Otherwise, it just ceases to be nothing and becomes a deity -- or many -- as the capitalized, proper name "No-Thing."
0 Replies
 
guigus
 
  1  
Mon 2 May, 2011 04:41 am
@JLNobody,
JLNobody wrote:

One can think of Nothing as really Everything. I do feel that when I die I will become both Nothing and Everything at the same time. But actually I (and you) are that now.


That's quite correct, it only misses a proper theoretical expression.
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Mon 2 May, 2011 06:39 am
@guigus,
I think the level of perception in which JL's statement has value is far beyond theoretical expression, which is why (I think) he said he feels, not thinks or knows...

Feel free to correct me if I misunderstand you JL.
TheoryJester
 
  1  
Mon 2 May, 2011 09:08 am
@mark noble,
I think It very possible that nothing exists.
Why not?
If something has the potential to exist then it must also have a potential not to exist.
north
 
  1  
Mon 2 May, 2011 12:25 pm
@TheoryJester,
TheoryJester wrote:

I think It very possible that nothing exists.
Why not?
If something has the potential to exist then it must also have a potential not to exist.


IT DOESN'T that the thing

what properties do existence have that non-existence haven't ?

the exact opposite to each other

so if non-existence came first , HOW would existence come from non-existence ?
guigus
 
  1  
Mon 2 May, 2011 08:13 pm
@Cyracuz,
Cyracuz wrote:

I think the level of perception in which JL's statement has value is far beyond theoretical expression, which is why (I think) he said he feels, not thinks or knows...

Feel free to correct me if I misunderstand you JL.


And I am saying precisely the opposite.
0 Replies
 
guigus
 
  1  
Mon 2 May, 2011 08:19 pm
@TheoryJester,
TheoryJester wrote:

I think It very possible that nothing exists.
Why not?
If something has the potential to exist then it must also have a potential not to exist.


If you say that nothing exists, then you are saying that no being exists. However, if you say that nothing does not exist, then you are saying that everything exists, including square circles. Nothing is a contradictory concept: searching for an unambiguous concept of nothing is futile.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/19/2025 at 05:18:18