@Night Ripper,
Night Ripper wrote:
guigus wrote:Even though, if nothing is not zero, then everything is -- including all numbers, which are hence false, along with anything else.
If someone says that "nothing is not zero" they mean that the
concept of nothing is not the same
concept as zero. They aren't saying "everything is zero", which would be absurd.
Take care: the
logical way of invalidating a conclusion is invalidating the
reasoning behind it, rather than protesting against the absurdity of the conclusion itself.
That said, at least you agree that the concepts of "nothing" and "zero" are different, which is not a small victory. So back to our contention:
Unfortunately to you, all any concept has is its meaning, which, in the case of nothing, is
not a damn thing. Or can you see any difference between the
concept of zero and
zero itself?
Of course "nothing" can mean
something -- called "nothing" -- but that is not the "concept" of nothing: it is rather its "reification," which you so vehemently condemned not so long ago.
Or could you point to something that the concept of nothing means, other the absence of anything? (What does that concept mean to you, precisely?)
Night Ripper wrote:In more technical terms, "nothing is not zero" isn't using "nothing" as a quantifier.
In more technical terms, if nothing were a quantifier, then it would be zero, which is precisely what we agree that it is not, in addition to being, as much precisely, what "nothing is not zero" means.
Night Ripper wrote:Try again.
I'm trying, believe me...