Any philosophers that think time is completely subjective?

Time exists not by itself but as part of a system of concepts. All concept exists within a system of concepts. All human concepts are imposed. So even though there are qualia that concepts refer to, the concept is how we experience the qualia as unified, therefore a separation of the concept and what it refers to is not exactly logical, however justified in practical terms.

I suppose that what is a part of a system of concepts is, itself, a concept. So, either time is not part of a system of concepts (since it is not a concept itself) or it is a part of a system of concepts, and is only a concept, and therefore time does not exist, but only the concept of time exists.

... there is nothing, nothing in heaven, or in nature or in mind or anywhere else which does not equally contain both immediacy and mediation, so that these two determinations reveal themselves to be unseparated and inseparable and the opposition between them to be a nullity.

6.432 How things are in the world is a matter of complete indifference
for what is higher. God does not reveal himself in the world.


6.4321 The facts all contribute only to setting the problem, not to its
solution.


6.44 It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it
exists.

I believe that time is the logical coordination of events. Is it not true that I wrote that last sentence before I wrote the one that I'm typing right now?

I believe that time is the logical coordination of events. Is it not true that I wrote that last sentence before I wrote the one that I'm typing right now?

Yes time consists of sequential moments or droplets of experience (hence of process). Time has no independent reality outside the ordering of events.

Yes, indeed. Time is an extremely useful way to organize experience conceptually. We could hardly live without such an invention. But I would still argue that time is utterly dependent upon human conceptualization. Concept first; time after.

All things qua things exist as concept. t

Yes time consists of sequential moments or droplets of experience (hence of process). Time has no independent reality outside the ordering of events.

Should I take this as meaning that you think that everything in space is happening simultaneously?

Should I take this as meaning that you think that everything in space is happening simultaneously?

No, because "simultaneous" only makes sense within the time-concept. All experience is mediated, conceptual. I know it's a strange thought, but I think that Hegel is right. Imagine a consciousness devoid of memory. I mean zero memory. They could not even posit/detect "change."

Imagine a universe where there are no minds whatsoever. In that universe there would be nothing to experience or detect anything. Should that lead us to believe that all phenomena are conceptual?

Imagine a universe where there are no minds whatsoever. In that universe there would be nothing to experience or detect anything. Should that lead us to believe that all phenomena are conceptual?

Yes and no. To imagine requires of course the same mind that we are trying to abstract (yank out) from the mental-model (a universe devoid of mind).

I do think that all phenomena are conceptual, to the degree that we think of them. But our experience is obviously more than thought, although always bound up in thought. Quantification-relation (to separate the "whole" into pieces, or individual objects) and quality (in the sense of qualia.)
Qualia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't think qualia can be reduced...nor that time is independent of concept.

And why don't you think that qualia can be reduced to the functional properties of perception?

I don't mind you thinking differently, but that doesn't mean that I approve of or respect your views. Idealism and conceptualism just don't hold enough water.

I feel that we organize qualia by means of concept, but this concept can only refer to qualia. For instance: "a rose is a rose is a rose." That sentence isn't red.

Qualia can be explained by the functional properties of perception, though. I really don't see an issue here.