@Pangloss,
Pangloss;156481 wrote:In the context of Philosophy, this post, to me, reeks of nationalist ideology, with your continuing differentiation between "us" and "them" (check out the pink floyd song!), "ours" and theirs", "immigrant" and "American", "they" and "the rest of us"...etc.
I understand where you're coming from, but I thought that in the last couple of decades, since the fall of the Berlin wall, that we humans had considered better methods for living together on this earth, than from one meaningless side of yet another wall amidst a never ending grid of borders and walls. Besides, we have already seen that "border security" and walls are easily circumvented by "the illegals".
Hopefully someone does have a reasonable solution here; one that is realistic, humanistic, and not based on nationalism, ethnic group, or social class. As with the war on drugs, it seems the war on illegal immigration is not winnable; it's going to keep happening no matter what we do. Does this mean we throw in the towel and let it happen? Or do we change policy to manage the inevitable in some constructive, more logical fashion?
I personally don't blame the people, I blame the system. If I were living in Mexico, I'd probably come here too. I've also worked with immigrants who were at one time illegal, and who are now LEGAL, (and continue to be) hard-working, productive members of society. I'm not sure if their legal status makes any difference whatsoever in the long run, except that it has a slight negative effect on tax revenue. They are here and working, regardless.
The Mexicans are basically just coming back to their native lands. 150 years ago, the border was a couple of states farther north and east, and slowly but surely, they have returned.
You are reading into words like "us" and "them" a little too much . They're just pronouns, to prevent jumbling up my thoughts by trying to use the appropraite proper noun every time . This wouldve been an extremely long, hard-to-read post, otherwise. . In fact, I am not "nationalistic " at all. I want nothing more than be able to move to the land my family is from (england/germany/scotland). I was just watching that episode of the show, and realizing how (on topics like this) people seem to be on one extreme or the other. I'm trying to see if we can come up with something that's more balanced and "fair"
It's all about balance, and middle ground, for me.
Also, there is hardly a good comparison for two completely different countries having a controlled border between them (as almost every single "developed" country has, without being "discriminative") and something like the Berlin wall, within a then turbulent country, seperating their own people . (there seems to be more citizens "guarding" the border, than government or military officials. If they got too militant,
then a comparison could be made). . Sure, it'd be nice to live in a land, where there were no countries, or walls, or anything (or govt, if you ask me, but thats a different topic). . and be just people on land, living together . . . . . but that ship has long since sailed. . . and now we must work with what is securely in place (and frankly has a slim chance of ever changing, unless something awesome happens!) . . .and try to find a reasonable way to go from there. We are dealing with "now" issues.
Judging by what you said though . . . . do you think anyone should be able to go to any country (with the world in it's present state) at any time, for any reason, with no restrictions? No borders, no walls or fences? . . . sounds to me like
thats more "idealistic" than anything i said.
Besides, I also said that I dont blame them (and that theyre more like refugees, with some of their home conditions). and most people know that theyre generally very hard working. I said that their situation was being taken advantage of by employers.. . When it comes to the economic situation though, it seems that having such an enormous amount of people working, but paying no taxes, yet using tax sponsored systems, is quite a strain on the "system" (those employers carry most of the blame for this one). . . and that giving them a chance for them to be "legal" . . . would help fix a lot of related problems . . . but this is only one contributing factor to our economic "predicament" . . . . if i could get away with not paying taxes . . i would . . .but then i would be held accountable for that back tax, and be considered for legal action, and i would be straining the system as well.
I just think that if someone is so adamant about
being "american" . . and not just living in america . . .then why wouldnt they (oh no, more pronouns) want to legalize their status.? . . .then theyd even be able to help their family (in their homeland) even more, and even have the option to bring them here, even if just to visit. They'd be able to at least make minimum wage (like the rest of the common working force, since you dont seem to like pronouns like "us" even when its nothing more than a language tool, used to prevent the annoying over use of proper nouns).
Im not trying to defend anything "american" . . .just looking for a balanced solution to a current "hot" issue . . no one's gonna convince the senate of anything "philosophical" . . .they dont think that way . . . . so the people (as a whole, since this is
supposed to be a democracy) must come up with, and speak up for a fair "american"
(referring to things like the the statue of liberty and, yes, american ideals,
in this instance. I think that
if a country promotes themselves a certain way (the land of oppurtunity and whatnot) then they should live up to that image .
)
Maybe I posted this on the wrong forum, on the wrong site. I think this subject requires more "logic" than "philosophy" (
not saying there's no logic in philosophy, so dont even bother arguing this) because it deals with a more political issue (and politicians are not philosophers, these days). . it requires action (countrywide) not just thought and reflection. Most of the nation is not philosophical and has no interest in philosophy, it's very unlikey to be handled in such a way. my apologies. :surrender: